Skip Navigation


European Heart Journal Advance Access originally published online on October 17, 2007
European Heart Journal 2007 28(22):2695-2696; doi:10.1093/eurheartj/ehm452
This Article
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
28/22/2695    most recent
ehm452v1
Right arrow E-letters: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when E-letters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Related articles in EHJ
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hofstra, L.
Right arrow Articles by Heymans, S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Hofstra, L.
Right arrow Articles by Heymans, S.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Published on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology. All rights reserved. © The Author 2007. For permissions please email: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

Annexin A5 and the failing heart; lost or found in translation?

Leonard Hofstra and Stephane Heymans*

Cardiovascular Research Institute Maastricht, Department of Cardiology, P Debeyelaan 25, 6202 AZ, Maastricht, The Netherlands

* Corresponding author. Tel: +31 43 3882949; fax: +31 43 3871055. E-mail address: s.heymans{at}cardio.unimaas.nl

This editorial refers to ‘Upregulation of myocardial Annexin A5 in hypertensive heart disease: association with systolic dysfunction’ by S. Ravassa et al., on page 2785


Footnotes

The opinions expressed in this article are not necessarily those of the Editors of the European Heart Journal or of the European Society of Cardiology.

Heart failure is the number one reason for hospital admission in patients above 65 years of age. It is predicted that the number of heart failure patients will almost double in the next 20 years. Ischaemic and hypertensive heart disease are the major causes of this disabling disease. Approximately 22% of women and 46% of men who have had a myocardial infarction will develop heart failure within 6 years.1 Still, hypertension is a chief cause of cardiac failure: diastolic dysfunction accounts for >50% of all heart failure patients.2 In the world we live in, an increasing number of people become at risk of developing hypertension heart disease due to the epidemic proportions of obesity and the concomitant development of diabetes. The obesity epidemic is not restricted to countries in the developed world, but is also starting to conquer some developing countries such as India and China.2

Efficient and rapid identification of patients who are susceptible to develop chronic heart failure (CHF) is going to be of imminent importance. In clinical practice, a combination of clinical exam, serum biomarkers, and imaging technology will provide the tools to establish the diagnosis of heart failure. Advances in serum biomarker diagnostics include the use of N-terminal pro-B type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) as a marker of the failing left ventricle.3 The release of NT-proBNP is triggered by stretch of myocardial cells and, therefore, is a direct reflection of myocardial cell stress. Novel studies on serum biomarkers in CHF comprise the detection of galectin-3, which reflects the activation of macrophages in the failing heart.4 This could provide incremental value over the use of NT-proBNP as a marker for heart failure, since it is an indicator of a different mechanism for the development of CHF.

The study presented by Ravassa and co-workers5 provides data obtained from a unique set of myocardial biopsies, ranging from healthy individuals, hypertensive patients without left ventricular hypertrophy (type A), hypertensive patients with left ventricular hypertrophy (type B), to patients with hypertension-related overt heart failure (type C). The authors used these samples to look for the presence of Annexin A5 in the myocardium in relation to cardiomyocyte apoptosis, left ventricular systolic function, and serum levels of Annexin A5. The main findings of their study are the increased cardiac and plasma levels of Annexin A5 in hypertensive patients with left ventricular hypertrophy or heart failure compared with controls. They observed an inverse relationship between the myocardial presence of Annexin A5 and systolic function of the left ventricle in all hypertensive individuals. Moreover, they showed that the myocardial presence of Annexin A5 was not related to any of the markers tested for apoptosis, including DNA laddering or the presence of activated caspase-3.

What can we learn from the data retrieved from this one-of-a-kind collection of myocardial biopsies? Does Annexin A5 have any diagnostic or prognostic significance in hypertensive heart disease or heart failure in general?

Annexin A5 is a 35 kDa plasma protein, with a high affinity for phosphatidylserine (PS) in the nanomolar range. PS, a plasma cell membrane phospholipid, is only present on the inner leaflet of the plasma cell membrane in viable cells, but is rapidly exposed during the activation of the apoptotic machinery. In addition, PS externalization has been observed in non-apoptotic circumstances, such as the activation of macrophages and ageing of red blood cells. PS exposure serves as an ‘eat-me-flag’, and is required for the phagocytosis of apoptotic cells by professional phagocytes.68 Due to its strong PS-binding properties, Annexin A5 is used in thousands of laboratories worldwide to detect apoptotic cells. In addition, labelling of Annexin with contrast agents has provided researchers with a non-invasive imaging tool to detect apoptosis in vivo, including in patients.9,10

One of the intriguing questions arising from the work of Ravassa et al.5 is the origin of the cardiac Annexin A5. The authors argue, based on a higher concentration of Annexin levels obtained from coronary sinus samples compared with plasma samples, that the heart is the likely source of the elevated plasma concentration of Annexin A5. Nevertheless, their explanation was not substantiated by elevated levels of mRNA. The authors state that transcriptional modification is likely to be the source of increased expression of myocardial Annexin A5. However, an alternative explanation for the presence of Annexin A5 inside cardiomyocytes could be the distinct property of Annexin A5 to internalize upon binding to PS. The internalization of exogenously administered Annexin A5 in cardiomyocytes has been clearly demonstrated in animal experiments of cardiac ischaemia.11 The required PS exposure in the failing heart, necessary for the binding to cardiomyocytes, was demonstrated in a fairly recent study, showing that in half of the patients with idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy, substantial uptake of radiolabelled Annexin A5 is present.10 Based on these findings, it could very well be that Annexin A5 produced by sources other than cardiomyocytes is responsible for the presence of Annexin inside the cardiomyocytes. For instance, it is known that endothelial cells are a major source for the production of Annexin A5 found in plasma samples.8

Another fascinating issue is the potential role of Annexin A5 in the failing heart. Although the authors speculate that Annexin A5 may be involved in calcium handling by cardiomyocytes,6 this function is still highly speculative. Previous studies indicate that substantial parts of failing hearts have increased PS exposure and related Annexin A5 binding.7,8 This probably reflects a rather diffuse activation caspase-3, one of the key executioner caspases. In contrast to many other cell types, cardiomyocytes fail to activate DNase upon activation of caspase-3, leaving the cell with an intact nucleus, but a destroyed contractile apparatus and a cell membrane exposing PS. A hypothetical function of Annexin A5 could be to shield and internalize PS exposure by the cardiomyocytes, thereby preventing exposure of cardiomyoctes to phagocytes. More definitive conclusions on the role of Annexin A5 in heart failure require detailed studies in Annexin A5 knockout and transgenic mice. Annexin A5 knockout mice are available, but do not show a spontaneous cardiovascular phenotype.12 Therefore, their response to cardiac stress, such as myocardial infarction or pressure overload, requires further investigation. The outcome of these studies might also be that Annexin is just an innocent bystander, rather than a cause of diseases.

Finally, since the elevated plasma concentration of Annexin A5 is significantly related to systolic dysfunction, it might be tempting to try and use plasma Annexin A5 levels as serum biomarkers for the detection of CHF in high risk cohort patients. However, as stated by the authors, they presented a cross-sectional study, and did not provide data with respect to the predictive value of this potential biomarker. In addition, it remains uncertain to what extent plasma Annexin A5 will give incremental value over the clinically used NT-proBNP. In order to provide incremental value over existing markers, novel markers need either to detect the disease in an earlier stadium or to be better indicators of the disease in specific patient subsets. Before reaching conclusions on the predictive value of Annexin A5 as a serum biomarker, robust clinical trials need to be conducted. Both the scientific and the clinical community would eagerly await the outcome of such trials.

In conclusion, Ravassa et al.5 provide us with an intriguing new aspect of heart failure development in hypertensive patients, which is the increased presence of myocardial Annexin A5 in cardiac biopsies of patients with hypertensive heart disease. These data may open novel avenues for diagnosis, and provide new insights into the development of CHF. However, rigorous studies on the exact function of Annexin A5 and its use as a novel biomarker for CHF are required.

Acknowledgements

This work has been supported by a grant of the Netherlands Heart Foundation (NHS 2005-B082) to S.H.

Conflict of interest: none declared.

Footnotes

The opinions expressed in this article are not necessarily those of the Editors of the European Heart Journal or of the European Society of Cardiology.

{dagger} doi:10.1093/eurheartj/ehm370 Back

References

  1. Weir RA, McMurray JJ, Velazquez EJ. Epidemiology of heart failure and left ventricular systolic dysfunction after acute myocardial infarction: prevalence, clinical characteristics, and prognostic importance. Am J Cardiol (2006) 97.
  2. Paulus WJ, Tschope C, Sanderson JE, Rusconi C, Flachskampf FA, Rademakers FE, Marino P, Smiseth OA, De Keulenaer G, Leite-Moreira AF, Borbely A, Edes I, Handoko ML, Heymans S, Pezzali N, Pieske B, Dickstein K, Fraser AG, Brutsaert DL. How to diagnose diastolic heart failure: a consensus statement on the diagnosis of heart failure with normal left ventricular ejection fraction by the Heart Failure and Echocardiography Associations of the European Society of Cardiology. Eur Heart J (2007) in press.
  3. Wu AH. Serial testing of B-type natriuretic peptide and NTpro-BNP for monitoring therapy of heart failure: the role of biologic variation in the interpretation of results. Am Heart J (2006) 152:828–834.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
  4. van Kimmenade RR, Januzzi JL Jr, Ellinor PT, Sharma UC, Bakker JA, Low AF, Martinez A, Crijns HJ, MacRae CA, Menheere PP, Pinto YM. Utility of amino-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide, galectin-3, and apelin for the evaluation of patients with acute heart failure. J Am Coll Cardiol (2006) 48:1217–1224.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  5. Ravassa S, González A, López B, Beaumont J, Querejeta R, Larman M, Díez J. Upregulation of myocardial Annexin A5 in hypertensive heart disease: association with systolic dysfunction. Eur Heart J (2007) 28:2785–2791. doi:10.1093/eurheartj/ehm370.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  6. Camors E, Monceau V, Charlemagne D. Annexins and Ca2+ handling in the heart. Cardiovasc Res (2005) 65:793–802.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  7. Gaipl US, Munoz LE, Rodel F, Pausch F, Frey B, Brachvogel B, von der Mark K, Poschl E. Modulation of the immune system by dying cells and the phosphatidylserine-ligand annexin A5. Autoimmunity (2007) 40:254–259.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
  8. Cederholm A, Frostegard J. Annexin A5 in cardiovascular disease and systemic lupus erythematosus. Immunobiology (2005) 210:761–768.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
  9. Boersma HH, Kietselaer BL, Stolk LM, Bennaghmouch A, Hofstra L, Narula J, Heidendal GA, Reutelingsperger CP. Past, present, and future of annexin A5: from protein discovery to clinical applications. J Nucl Med (2005) 46:2035–2050.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  10. Kietselaer BL, Reutelingsperger CP, Boersma HH, Heidendal GA, Liem IH, Crijns HJ, Narula J, Hofstra L. Noninvasive detection of programmed cell loss with 99mTc-labeled annexin A5 in heart failure. J Nucl Med (2007) 48:562–567.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  11. Dumont EA, Hofstra L, van Heerde WL, van den Eijnde S, Doevendans PA, DeMuinck E, Daemen MA, Smits JF, Frederik P, Wellens HJ, Daemen MJ, Reutelingsperger CP. Cardiomyocyte death induced by myocardial ischemia and reperfusion: measurement with recombinant human annexin-V in a mouse model. Circulation (2000) 102:1564–1568.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  12. Brachvogel B, Dikschas J, Moch H, Welzel H, von der Mark K, Hofmann C, Poschl E. Annexin A5 is not essential for skeletal development. Mol Cell Biol (2003) ;23:2907–2913.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?

Related articles in EHJ:

Upregulation of myocardial Annexin A5 in hypertensive heart disease: association with systolic dysfunction
Susana Ravassa, Arantxa González, Begoña López, Javier Beaumont, Ramón Querejeta, Mariano Larman, and Javier Díez
EHJ 2007 28: 2785-2791. [Abstract] [FREE Full Text]  




This Article
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
28/22/2695    most recent
ehm452v1
Right arrow E-letters: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when E-letters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Related articles in EHJ
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hofstra, L.
Right arrow Articles by Heymans, S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Hofstra, L.
Right arrow Articles by Heymans, S.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?