Skip Navigation


European Heart Journal Advance Access originally published online on January 5, 2007
European Heart Journal 2007 28(3):376-379; doi:10.1093/eurheartj/ehl457
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
28/3/376    most recent
ehl457v1
Right arrow E-letters: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when E-letters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (3)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Aburawi, E. H.
Right arrow Articles by O'Sullivan, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Aburawi, E. H.
Right arrow Articles by O'Sullivan, J.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The European Society of Cardiology 2007. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

Relation of aortic root dilatation and age in Marfan's syndrome

Elhadi H. Aburawi*,{dagger} and John O'Sullivan

Department of Paediatric Cardiology, Freeman Hospital, Newcastle upon Tyne, NE7 7DN, UK

Received 15 April 2006; revised 29 September 2006; accepted 7 December 2006; online publish-ahead-of-print 5 January 2007.

* Corresponding author. Tel: +46 46 17 82 61; fax: +46 46 17 81 50. E-mail address: elhadi.aburawi{at}med.lu.se


    Abstract
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 Limitations of study
 Conclusion
 Acknowledgement
 References
 
Aims The main aim of this study was to describe the age at which pathological aortic root dilation occurs in patients with Marfan's syndrome (MFS).

Methods and results A total of 160 patients with MFS attending a regional cardiac centre were reviewed retrospectively. Dilation of the ascending aorta was diagnosed by comparing the maximum aortic sinus measurement with control data from the literature. We employed a Kaplan–Meier survival curve to estimate the age at which dilatation occurs. The mean age of the total group at presentation was 15.5 years (range 1.5–40 years). Skeletal abnormalities were present in 95%. Eye involvement was found in 18%. In the 115/160 patients with an abnormal aortic root, 78/115 (68%) developed aortic root dilatation before 19 years of age. From the Kaplan–Meier curve, it can be estimated that about 35% of the patients have aortic root dilatation already at the age of 5 years and 70% before the age of 20 years, and at least 80% by 40 years. There were 31 patients with normal aortic root when first seen but 24/31 (77%) developed aortic root dilatation before the age of 19 years and 7/31 (22.6%) after 19 years of age. Of those (seven patients) who developed new pathological aortic root dilatation after age 19 years, the age range was between 21 and 40 years with a mean of 27 years. Overall, 13 patients (8%) had surgery for aortic root replacement.

Conclusion Aortic root dilatation develops early in MFS and was present in 35% by the age of 5 years and 68% by 19 years. Even though new aortic root dilation is relatively rare, it is not possible to safely discharge patients with MFS as about one-third of the patients in our series who developed new pathological aortic root dilation did so after the age of 19 years.

Key Words: Marfan's syndrome • Aorta root • Puberty • Cohort study


    Introduction
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 Limitations of study
 Conclusion
 Acknowledgement
 References
 
Marfan's syndrome (MFS) is an inherited (autosomal dominant) disorder of connective tissue, in which the most pronounced abnormalities occur in the musculoskeletal, cardiovascular, and ocular systems. It is caused by mutations in the fibrillin gene locus on chromosome 15 (fibrillin-1).1,2 The difficulty with precise diagnosis makes it difficult to give an accurate population prevalence figure, but it is estimated at approximately one in 10 000 individuals.3 Aortic dilatation and dissection are the major causes of morbidity and mortality and for this reason all these patients are routinely followed-up and assessed. If aortic root dilatation develops, more frequent follow-up is necessary. It is not clear whether continuing follow-up is required on children and adults whose initial scan/assessment shows normal aortic root. The following study was undertaken to describe the age at which aortic root dilatation was diagnosed. We were particularly interested to observe the progress of those patients who had normal aortic dimensions at presentation and to see if and when aortic root dilatation occurred.


    Methods
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 Limitations of study
 Conclusion
 Acknowledgement
 References
 
Data files of 300 patients who were attending the joint Paediatric Cardiac and Genetic clinic for MFS were reviewed. A clinical diagnosis of MFS was made in 160 patients by the clinical genetic team using the criteria of De Paepe et al.4 The follow-up period was from 1982 to 2000. Follow-up of each individual patient is defined as the time interval between first and most recent clinical and echocardiography assessment. Age at first visit, age at first abnormal aortic root measurement, family history of MFS, and skeletal abnormalities were retrieved from the notes.

The echocardiography measurements were taken from the cross-sectional image and frozen at end diastole using the parasternal long-axis view. Leading edge to leading edge was used to measure the maximum aortic sinus diameter and sino-tubular junction and these were then plotted on the appropriate body surface area chart.5 All patients who had aortic root diameter exceeding two standard deviations above the mean were started on a B-blocker.6

Statistical analysis
These measured variables were analysed by means of descriptive statistics. All curves and diagrams were performed using Stat View (SAS Inst. 5.0) as a statistical software package.7 The survival analysis technique was employed to account for both left- and right-censored data. We assumed to investigate one variable that is the occurrence of the aortic root dilatation over the whole period of follow-up. It is assessed by including all patients (n = 160) and analysing the age at which the aorta root became dilated over the period of follow-up (event time) vs. the estimated cumulative distribution of having the aortic root dilatation (endpoint). The data was analysed with SAS Lifereg procedure, which fits parametric models to failure time data that can be left, right, or interval censored. The left-censored indicates the patients who are already abnormal when included in the analysis, and the right-censored represents those in whom the event does not occur. Interval-censored indicates in what age-interval the abnormality occurred. For the interval-censored patients, we assume that the event happened in the middle of the interval. Since we used no covariates, we fitted an intercept-only model for the natural logarithm of the response variable with a Weibull distribution for the failure time. The output from the SAS Lifereg procedure is presented as a Kaplan–Meier curve. Descriptive statistics are presented as mean ± standard deviation of the mean.


    Results
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 Limitations of study
 Conclusion
 Acknowledgement
 References
 
The total number of patients diagnosed as MFS, according to Ghent criteria, over this time period was 160. It is slightly more common in males than females (1.4 : 1) and the age range at first clinic visit was between 1.5 and 38 years, with a mean of 15.5 years. Family history was positive in 75%. Skeletal abnormalities were found in 95% in our group and the eye manifestations as confirmed by ophthalmologists were present in 29 patients (18%) (Table 1). Mitral valve prolapse was found in 29 patients (18%), 32 (20%) had mitral regurgitation, and 10 patients (6.25%) had more than trivial aortic regurgitation. Two patients had a secundum atrial septal defect.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Table 1 Clinical characteristics (n = 160)

 
Aortic root dilatation, related to body surface area, was found in 115/160 (72%) and 69 (60%) of them were subsequently prescribed beta-blockers. Of those with an abnormal aortic root, 78/115 (68%) were less than 19 years of age (Table 2 and Figure 1). A normal aortic root measurement at first visit was found in 76 patients (48%), their age range between 1.5 and 36 years and a mean of 15 years. Of these 76 patients, 45 (59%) stayed normal and 31 patients (41%) became abnormal throughout the period of the study. In those who subsequently became abnormal (n = 31), there were 24/31 patients (77.4%) who developed aortic root dilatation before the age of 19 years and one patient (3.2%) who developed aortic root dilatation at 5 years, and 7/31 (22.6%) after 19 years of age. Of those 7 patients who developed new pathological aortic root dilatation after age 19 years, the age range was between 21 and 40 years with a mean of 27 years (Table 2 and Figure 2A and B). The age range of these patients (n = 31) was between 5 and 40 years with a mean of 17.6 years (SD 8.4) and the mean length of follow-up was 4.4 years. The range of the progression rate in these patients is in between 0.06 and 0.7 cm/year with a mean 0.23 cm/year (SD 0.17).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Table 2 MFS patients with normal/abnormal aortic root and their age range (n = 160)

 

Figure 4571
View larger version (8K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PowerPoint slide]
 
Figure 1 Total number of those with dilated aorta root (n = 115).

 

Figure 4572
View larger version (10K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PowerPoint slide]
 
Figure 2 (A) Patients (n = 31) with an initially normal aortic measurement but dilatation develops on follow-up. (B) Spaghettis graph represents age and aorta root diameter on follow-up of the same patients as in (A).

 
For all patients (n = 160), aortic root dilatation was diagnosed in 115/160 patients (72%) over the period of follow-up, mean 6.5 with a range 1–18 years, the age and aorta root diameter are presented as Spaghettis graph model (Figure 3). From the Kaplan–Meier curve (Figure 4), it can be estimated that about 35% of the patients have aortic root dilatation already at the age of 5 years and about 70% before the age of 20 years. At the age of 40, we estimated that at least 80% of the patients have aortic root dilatation.


Figure 4573
View larger version (16K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PowerPoint slide]
 
Figure 3 Spaghettis graph represents all patients’ age and aorta root diameter (n = 160).

 

Figure 4574
View larger version (7K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PowerPoint slide]
 
Figure 4 The Kaplan–Meier curve shows the age at which the aorta root became dilated (event time) vs. the cumulative distribution of aorta dilatation (endpoint).

 
Overall, 13 patients (8%) had surgery for aortic root and six presented acutely with aortic root dissection that had replacement with either the suspension or replacement of the aortic valve.


    Discussion
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 Limitations of study
 Conclusion
 Acknowledgement
 References
 
The prevalence of aortic root dilatation in our population was 72%, which is comparable with other studies. There is little data on the age at which the aortic dilatation develops. Table 3 shows the findings of some of the studies818 that address this. Brown et al.12 report a figure of 60% for a group between 3 and 61 years of age. Kornbluth et al.18 showed that patients with the MFS (age range 14–64 years, mean 30) exhibited aortic dilatation at all ages. Considerable variation in the severity of aortic dilatation was seen at each age, with patients as young as 20 years having severe dilatation of the aorta. Aortic root dilatation was present in 48 of 57 (84%) of their patients at the time of initial examination. Of these patients, 34 had follow-up echocardiograms. van Karnebeek et al.17 report a prevalence of 83% for aortic root dilatation in children before the age of 16 years. They showed that in 52 patients, age range between 1 and 16 years when first seen, followed-up for a mean of 7.7 years, 43/52 (83%) developed dilatation, and they found steady decline until the age of 16 years (with a somewhat steep phase between age 4 and 7 years), after which only one patient developed dilatation until 25 years. We found in the group who subsequently develop aortic root dilatation under our follow-up, 24/31 (77.4%) did so before the age of 19 years and one can conclude therefore the risk for aortic root dilatation is at its highest during the growth phase. MFS patients should be monitored quite closely while going through their growth spurt. However, 7/31 patients (22.6%) developed aortic root dilatation after the age of 19 years and the oldest age was to develop new dilatation 40 years after follow-up period of 4 years.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Table 3 Prevalence of cardiac/cardiovascular involvement in patients with MFS from literatures review and population study

 
The question of how long one needs to perform echocardiographic follow-up of the aortic root in patients with MFS is a difficult one and will depend on many factors such as family history of dissection. The fact that patients with virtually normal aortic root dimensions can occasionally dissect complicates the issue. However, our study does provide useful information, as most patients with MFS will develop aortic root dilatation before the age of 21 years. One must accept that aortic root dilatation can occur late although this is a relatively rare occurrence. Unfortunately, it is not possible to completely reassure a patient with MFS with regard to the aortic root even if the measurement is within the normal range at age 21 years.


    Limitations of study
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 Limitations of study
 Conclusion
 Acknowledgement
 References
 
This is a retrospective study with a limited number of years of follow-up and the groups were difficult to compare with each other because they were not statistically designed. The study was based in one regional cardiac centre, so there may have been some selection bias that cannot be excluded. A further limitation is that MRI or CT-scan for dural ectasia, as a major criterion for diagnosis, was not performed in our population.


    Conclusion
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 Limitations of study
 Conclusion
 Acknowledgement
 References
 
Aortic root dilatation developed early in MFS, 35% at 5 years and 68% by 19 years of age in our whole population. However, there is no age limit beyond which we can safely predict that the aorta will stay normal and therefore long-term follow-up is necessary in patients with MFS.


    Acknowledgement
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 Limitations of study
 Conclusion
 Acknowledgement
 References
 
The authors would like to thank Dr. Anna Audin and Dr Jonas Björk for their assistance with the statistical analysis.

Conflict of interest: none declared.


    Footnotes
 
{dagger} Present address: Division of Pediatric Cardiology/Department of Pediatrics, Lund University Hospital, 221 85 Lund, Sweden Back


    References
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 Limitations of study
 Conclusion
 Acknowledgement
 References
 

  1. Dietz HC and Pyeritz R. (1995) Mutations in the human gene for fibrillin-1 (FBN1) in the MFS and related disorders. Hum Mol Genet 4:1799–1809.[Abstract]
  2. Milewicz DM. (1998) Molecular genetics of Marfan syndrome and Ehlers–Danlos type IV. Curr Opin Cardiol 13:198–204.[Web of Science][Medline]
  3. Fleischer KJ, Nousari HC, Anhalt GJ, Stone CD, Laschinger JC. (1997) Immunohistochemical abnormalities of fibrillin in cardiovascular tissues in Marfan‘s syndrome. Ann Thorc Surg 63:1012–1017.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  4. De Paepe A, Devereux RB, Dietz HC, Hennekam RCM, Pyeritz RE. (1996) Revised diagnostic criteria for the Marfan syndrome. Am J Med Genet 62:417–426.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
  5. Roman MJ, Deveraux RB, Kramer-Fox R, Spitzer MC. (1989) Comparison of cardiovascular and skeletal features of primary mitral valve prolapse and Marfan syndrome. Am J Cardiol 63:317–321.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
  6. Shore J, Berger KR, Murphy EA, Pyeritz RE. (1994) Progression of aortic dilatation and the benefit of long term B-adrenergic blockade in Marfan's syndrome. N Eng J Med 330:1335–1341.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  7. SAS/STAT User's Guide. (SAS Institute Inc, Cary, NC).
  8. Rados A. (1942) Marfan's syndrome (arachnodactyly coupled with dislocation of the lens). Arch Ophthalmol (Chicago) 27:477.
  9. Goyette EM and Palmer PW. (1953) Cardiovascular lesions in arachnodactyly. Circulation 7:373.[Medline]
  10. McKusick VA. (1955) The Cardiovascular aspect of Marfan's syndrome. A heritable disorder of connective tissue disorder. Circulation 11:321–342.
  11. Phornphutkul C, Rosenthal A, Nadas A. (1973) Cardiac manifestations of Marfan'ssyndrome in infancy and childhood. Circulation 47:587–596.
  12. Brown OR, Demots H, Kloster FE, Roberts A, Menashe VD, Beals RK. (1975) Aortic root dilatation and mitral valve prolapse in Marfan's syndrome: an echocardiograph study. Circulation 52:651–657.
  13. Sisk HE, Zahk KG, Pyertz RE. (1983) The Marfan's syndrome in early childhood: analysis of patients diagnosed less than 4 years of age. Am J Cardiol 52:353–358.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
  14. Geva T, Hegesh J, Frand M. (1987) The clinical course and echocardiography of Marfan syndrome in childhood. Am J D C 141:1179–1182.
  15. Elhabbal MH. (1992) Cardiovascular manifestations of Marfan's syndrome in the young. Am Heart J 123:752–757.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
  16. Gillinov AM, Zehr KJ, Redmond JM, Gott VL, Deitz HC, Reitz BA, Laschinger JC, Cameron DE. (1997) Cardiac operations in children with Marfan's syndrome. Indications and results. Ann Thorac Surgery 64:1140–1145.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  17. van Karnebeek CDM, Naeff MSJ, Mudler BJM, Hennekam RCM, Offringa M. (2001) Natural history of cardiovascular manifestations in Marfan syndrome. Arc Dis Child 84:129–137.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  18. Kornbluth M, Schnittger I, Eyngorina I, Gasner C, Liang DH. (1999) Clinical Outcome in the Marfan Syndrome with Ascending Aortic Diltation Followed Annually by Echocardiography. Am J Cardiol 84:753–755.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?



This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
28/3/376    most recent
ehl457v1
Right arrow E-letters: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when E-letters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (3)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Aburawi, E. H.
Right arrow Articles by O'Sullivan, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Aburawi, E. H.
Right arrow Articles by O'Sullivan, J.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?