Skip Navigation


European Heart Journal Advance Access originally published online on January 24, 2007
European Heart Journal 2007 28(3):381; doi:10.1093/eurheartj/ehl481
This Article
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
28/3/381-a    most recent
ehl481v1
Right arrow E-letters: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when E-letters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Yin, Y.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Yin, Y.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The European Society of Cardiology 2007. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

Prospective randomized study comparing amiodarone vs. amiodarone plus losartan vs. amiodarone plus perindopril for the prevention of atrial fibrillation recurrence in patients with lone paroxysmal atrial fibrillation: reply

Yuehui Yin

The Second Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing
University of Medical Sciences
74 Linjiang Road
Yuzhong District
Chongqing 400010
People's Republic of China
Tel: +86 23 63777035
Fax: +86 23 63822815
E-mail address: yinyuehui63{at}yahoo.com.cn

We are thankful to Kanna et al. for their interest in our study.1 The allocation sequence in our study was generated by serially placing patients into each of the three treatment groups. As noted in the ‘study limitations’ section of our paper, careful attention was paid to maintain a strict protocol through the entire enrolment period to avoid any bias introduced by the investigators. To further limit the bias, only one investigator (Y.Y.) was in charge of allocating the patients into the treatment groups. Moreover, as shown in our paper, the results were not altered after adjusting for possible confounders using the Cox proportional hazard model. With respect to the effect size, we agree with Kanna et al. that the event rate based on observational studies may overestimate the observed event rate, and our study may have been underpowered to detect the observed treatment effects associated with losartan and perindopril. However, our limited resources did not allow for further enrolment beyond our predetermined sample size.

Our study suggests that adding losartan or perindopril to amiodarone has a beneficial effect in preventing recurrence of atrial fibrillation (AF) in patients with lone paroxysmal AF. It is also the first clinical trial comparing the efficacy of losartan and perindopril in the prevention of AF recurrence in this group of patients. We believe that our findings are of considerable importance to the existing literature on the management of AF. This study provides a strong platform for conducing large-scale randomized trials and will make an important contribution to meta-analyses assessing the role of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors and angiotensin receptor blockers in the treatment of this most common sustained arrhythmia.2,3

References

  1. Yin Y, Dalal D, Liu Z, Wu J, Liu D, Lan X, Dai Y, Su L, Ling Z, She Q, Luo K, Woo K, Dong J. (2006) Prospective randomized study comparing amiodarone vs. amiodarone plus losartan vs. amiodarone plus perindopril for the prevention of atrial fibrillation recurrence in patients with lone paroxysmal atrial fibrillation. Eur Heart J 27:1841–1846.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  2. Chalmers TC, Levin H, Sacks HS, Reitman D, Berrier J, Nagalingam R. (1987) Meta-analysis of clinical trials as a scientific discipline. I: control of bias and comparison with large co-operative trials. Stat Med 6:315–328.[Web of Science][Medline]
  3. Sackett DL and Cook DJ. (1993) Can we learn anything from small trials? Ann N Y Acad Sci 703:25–31 discussion 31–2.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?



This Article
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
28/3/381-a    most recent
ehl481v1
Right arrow E-letters: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when E-letters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Yin, Y.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Yin, Y.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?