European Heart Journal Advance Access originally published online on February 5, 2007
European Heart Journal 2007 28(5):634-637; doi:10.1093/eurheartj/ehl491
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Trends and contexts in European cardiology practice for the next 15 years
The Madrid Declaration: a report from the European Conference on the Future of Cardiology, Madrid, 23 June 2006
European Society of Cardiology, The European Heart House, 2035 Route des Colles, B.P. 179Les Templiers, FR-06903 Sophia Antipolis, France
Received 1 December 2006; revised 1 December 2006; accepted 3 January 2007; online publish-ahead-of-print 5 February 2007.
* Corresponding author. Tel: +34 917242370; fax: +34 917242371. E-mail address: escaned{at}secardiologia.es
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
In the near future, the practice of cardiology in Europe will be strongly influenced by a complex interplay of epidemiological, social, economical, professional, and technological evolving factors. The present report summarizes the conclusions of an expert conference organized by the European Society of Cardiology to discuss the interactions between these phenomena, in an attempt to foresee the potential scenario in which cardiovascular healthcare and research will develop in the near future, and to anticipate solutions to the identified problems.
Key Words: Clinical services Epidemiology Training Guidelines Research
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Cardiovascular diseases (CVD) remain the most important health problem facing developed countries in the 21st century. In spite of the many developments in its prevention, diagnosis, and treatment, there has been a general consensus among healthcare providers that the cardiology services in many countries are heading towards a crisis. This belief has mainly been founded on indicators such as a current decline in the number of cardiologist, increasing healthcare cost, and difficulties encountered during implementation of the available knowledge and strategies. Currently, the amount of information available to support this belief is limited and is mainly based on leading opinions in the field of cardiology either during debates or during informal discussions.
Over the past years, there has been a tendency to contemplate the future of Cardiology as a parallel continuum with the advancement of technology and treatment, to the point that the general population and even many cardiologists may believe that this will provide the ultimate solution to CVD. However, it is possible that the highlighting of new developments by the media obscures real solutions such as full implementation of primary prevention policies and, in general, of evidence-based knowledge.
The European Society of Cardiology (ESC) has as a mission to reduce the burden of CVD in Europe and considered it important to initiate a comprehensive debate among experts on the complex interplay of social changes with scientific and professional factors that may influence the practice cardiology in the near future. A dedicated meeting with the participation of constituent bodies of the ESC (namely National Societies, Working Groups and Associations) was organized by the ESC jointly with the Spanish Society of Cardiology, and held in Madrid in June 2006. Discussions took place around four different areas: (i) CVD in the 21st century, which included an extensive discussion on the epidemiology of CVD, its economics and social changes; (ii) evolving diagnostic and therapeutic approaches; (iii) human resources in cardiology; and (iv) evolving models of basic and clinical research. This article constitutes a consensus report of the discussions and the debate held by the delegates attending the meeting.
| Foreseeing CVD in the European society of the 21st century |
|---|
|
|
|---|
CVDs cause almost half of all deaths in Europe. In the near future, the epidemiology of CVD across European countries will be influenced by changes in demographics, culture, fiscal matters, and societal factors. The epidemiology of CVD shows that these diseases are a manifestation of many and various conditions, including metabolic and inflammatory perturbations. The risk factors are well known, and their fundamental origins are becoming clearer, suggesting that in many cases heart disease, cancer, and diabetes share a common aetiology. There is extensive evidence that CVD could be prevented by lifestyle changes and better use of medicines that are already available. New preventive strategies should be introduced when available. However, cardiologist should be aware that these actions will delay the onset of CVD rather that eliminating the problem.
For at least the next 25 years, CVD will continue to be a major healthcare problem in spite of the introduction of new medical treatments and diagnostic technologies. Demographic trends in the European population will shift the epidemiological pattern of CVD, since the decline of age-adjusted mortality in many European countries conceals an overall increase in the number of persons afflicted with CVD.1,2 As a result, CVD will become a central part of the complex pattern of disorders of the elderly.
The cost of CVD to the healthcare systems of the EU will continue to rise in the short and medium term as a result of the increasing costs associated with new developments and with the overall rise in healthcare inflation.3 The increase in the need for medical care will require cost-saving or cost-effective use of limited resources. Disinvestment away from non-cost-effective interventions and use of savings in cost-effective ones appear mandatory. Improved knowledge on cost-effective modalities is necessary, and should be combined with better implementation of currently available management guidelines. The cardiologist and their associations should take an active position in this field and strive to convince politicians that health contributes to productivity of the society and that health should be considered a positive economic factor. From a general perspective, adequate funding of healthcare should be considered an investment.
Since expenditure will remain a major determinant of access to proper management of CVD, it will also be a potential source of inequity across Europe, particularly after the recent admission to the EU of Eastern European countries with lower gross domestic products.4 Inequities are even more likely to occur in the access to novel medical modalities, whether diagnostic or therapeutic. Investigation of non-medical factors that influence patient access and that can be influenced locally should be undertaken. Access to both proven and innovative medical technologies might be improved by optimizing funding and reimbursement processes locally. Once again, cardiologists and their organizations have to take increased responsibility in these issues, as well as in priority settings.
At a time of expanded access to information, efforts to bridge the gap between the medical profession and the society should be made. In the immediate future, consumer-driven healthcare will be the rule in a society made up of better informed citizens. Efforts to assess the values of preferences in the population regarding health and healthcare should be encouraged. Access to health quality data and improved knowledge of CVD by healthcare users, patients, and the general public should improve the quality of care and facilitate the implementation of guidelines. The creation of reliable sources of information for the public via the internet would be advantageous as a way to counteract spotlighting of new cures by media and direct consumer advertising campaigns.
| Anticipating the shortage of cardiologists and organizational healthcare changes |
|---|
|
|
|---|
A consequence of these epidemiological changes is that an increased demand for resources and manpower is inevitable. In this regard, the availability of trained cardiologists varies considerably across Europe, with an apparent general shortage.5,6 To some extent, this reflects a true lack, but other reasons may be the different type of health delivery systems with physicians from other specialties and specially trained nurses being in charge of certain areas of cardiovascular medicine. There is a high demand for improved knowledge in this field that may clarify the situation. This would also provide information on functioning systems to those who have not yet developed novel modalities of patient care such as nurse-lead clinics.
In any case, the solutions to the shortage of cardiologists should be formulated taking into account the social and epidemiological changes that will influence healthcare trends. Cardiology is shifting towards Cardiovascular Medicine with a more general perspective. This will require a greater requirement for general knowledge, as well as changes in the organizational model of healthcare towards process-oriented and holistic patient management. One solution to achieve this end might be the introduction of multidisciplinary teams integrating cardiac sub-specialties, primary care, non-cardiac specialties, and ancillary services in which the cardiologist will act as a process leader in the different presentations of CVD. In these teams, boundaries between specialties will be softened, and experts in different modalities will collaborate rather than compete. Joint clinical services and common diagnostic and therapeutic pathways will be developed for specific processes: acute coronary syndromes, non-invasive diagnosis, heart failure, etc. The rapidly evolving diagnostic and therapeutic technologies (e.g. non-invasive imaging, invasive diagnostic and treatment, regenerative therapy, etc.) will demand a balanced investment in equipment and knowledge. For logistic reasons, in the early phases of this change the equipment and facilities used in the management of disease processes may not be in the same location; however, it is foreseeable that newer hospitals will be designed to provide this new operative structure.7
According to the epidemiological predictions, a large number of clinical cardiologists, responsible for the overall management of cardiovascular patients, will be needed to ensure the demonstrated benefit of specialized care. These clinical cardiologists should not be by default cardiologists; instead, they should have a renewed profile, with a broader training in cardiovascular medicine and related subjects, and in coordinating clinical processes. At a time when most junior cardiologists opt for training in technical sub-specialties, efforts to make this professional option attractive for juniors should be made.
Training schemes should focus on the evolving epidemiological and organizational changes in traditional cardiology. An example of this can be found in the ESC Core Curriculum, aimed to standardize throughout Europe the basic knowledge, skills, and attitudes that all cardiologists should have.8 The risk of a primary focus on technology rather than on the patient must be acknowledged and counteracted; training programmes should make sure that the holistic patient approach is not lost, but at the same time protecting the needed specific skills with focused training programmes including novel educational tools. It is foreseeable, for example, that future non-invasive diagnostic specialists will be trained in several imaging modalities, and that invasive cardiologists will train using simulation models before working with patients. These programs have to be overseen, and a higher demand on examination, audit, and accreditation is recommended.
| Promoting research and translating its results to practice |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Cardiovascular research will typically show a strong interplay between biology and technology. This kind of research will demand working teams integrated by clinician-scientists, clinical investigators, and translational-scientists. However, the number of clinician-scientists is rapidly decreasing, and the conditions for the pursuit of a career in clinical research are fading or at least considered unattractive by young cardiologists.9 A generalized concern exists regarding this shortage of academic cardiologists and the foreseeable consequences for the quality and amount of independent research in the field of CVDs, which in the predicted scenario will lead to a failure in the translation of knowledge to clinical practice. Actions to correct this tendency must be taken urgently. Training programmes including research training in a formalized way and tutorship programs to support individuals with an interest and capabilities in research should be enforced.10 Rating of scientific chiefs should be made not only on research productivity, but also on mentorship of juniors.
The costs of research in CVDs should be faced in a similar perspective to that outlined above for healthcare costs: research is highly cost-effective because extending healthy lives generates enormous returns to the society. Efforts should be made to integrate the interest of the industry and the general society in cardiovascular research. Publicprivate partnerships and networking of institutions across Europe may improve significantly the quality of research, with the advantage of a major independence and improved use of the cooperation from the industry. Strong European research institutions free from financial bias should be considered as fundamental.
On the basis of the current evidence, there is an urgent need to improve implementation of clinical practice guidelines at national levels in Europe.10 Adequate means to create awareness of guidelines among physicians, politicians, and patients is required. The performance of European observational studies for assessing a wide range of long-term outcomes of guidelines implementation should be encouraged.11 These studies should assess not only adherence to guidelines,12 but also whether evidence-based medicine is reproducible in and transferable into clinical practice. The results of these surveys should be used more often to actively guide or stimulate quality improvement, for example, by use as benchmark instrument by individual hospitals.
| Acknowledgements |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The Madrid Declaration was the result of the debate and further review of the manuscript by the participants in the European Conference on the Future of Cardiology (Madrid 23 June 2006). Their names are listed below in alphabetical order:
Cassiano Abreu e Lima, Portuguese Society of Cardiology; Fernando Alfonso Manterola, Interventional Cardiology Section, Spanish Society of Cardiology (SSC); Luis Alonso-Pulpón, SSC; Felicita Andreotti, ESC Working Group Thrombosis; Vicente Bertomeu Martínez, SSC Hypertension Section; Xavier Bosch, SSC; Ramón Bover, SSC; Dirk L Brutsaert, ESC Heart Failure Association; Hector Bueno Zamora, SSC Ischemic Heart Disease Section; Victoria Cañadas Godoy, SSC; Gilda Caruso, ESC Working Group Development Anatomy and Pathology; Alfonso Castro Beiras, SSC; Francisco Javier Chorro Gascó, SSC; Javier Colás, Technology and Health Foundation, Spain; Ioan Coman, Romanian Society of Cardiology; Bertrand Crozatier, ESC Myocardial Function Association; Willem Dassen, ESC Working Group Computers; Andrejs Erglis, Latvian Society of Cardiology; Javier Escaned Barbosa, SSC; Francisco Fernández-Avilés, ESC; Roberto Ferrari, ESC; Kevin Fox, British Society of Cardiology; Mercedes Frances, Farmaindustría, Spain; Alan Fraser, ESC European Association of Echocardiography; Valentin Fuster, National Cardiovascular Research Centre, Spain; Ramón García Calabozo, SSC Cardiac Stimulation Section; Pablo García Pavia SSC; Anselm Gitt, ESC; Dietmar Glogar, Austrian Society of Cardiology; Martin Gottwik, German Society of Cardiology; Henrik Hansen, Danish Society of Cardiology; Juha Hartikainen, Finish Cardiac Society; Johan Hjertqvist, Health Consumer Powerhouse, Brussels; Alberto Infante Campos, Spanish Ministry of Health; Manuel Jiménez Mena, SSC; Miran F. Kenda, Slovenian Society of Cardiology; André Keren, ESC Working Group Myocardial and Pericardial Diseases; Aleksandras Laucevicius, Lithuanian Society of Cardiology; John Lekakis, Hellenic Cardiological Society; Rosa María Lidón, SSC; Esteban López de Sá y Areses, SSC; Ramón Luengo-Fernández, Health Economics Research Centre, University of Oxford; Fernando Martin Burrieza, SSC; José Luis Merino Llorens, SSC Electrophysiology and Arrhythmia Section; Davor Milicic, Croatian Cardiac Society; Iveta Mintale, Latvian Society of Cardiology; Javier Moscoso, Spanish Ministry of Education; Nekane Murga, SSC Clinical Cardiology Section; Javier Ortega Marcos, SSC; Carmen de Pablo y Zarzosa, SSC Prevention and Reabilitation Section; Juan Carlos Paré Bardera, SSC Echocardiography and Imaging Section; Francisco de Paula Rodriguez Perera, National Cardiovascular Research Centre, Spain; Cayetano Permanyer, SSC; Philip A. Poole Wilson, ESC; Pavel Poredos, ESC Working Group Peripheral Circulation; Silvia Priori, ESC; Stéphanie Raty, ESC; Cecilie Risöe, Norwegian Society of Cardiology; Eulalia Roig, SSC; Lars Ryden, ESC; Elena Salas González, SSC; María Jesús Salvador, SSC; Juan Sanchis, SSC; Gines Sanz, SSC; Wilma Scholte Op Reimer, ESC Working Group Cardiovascular Nursing; Otto Smiseth, ESC; Eva Swahn, Swedish Society of Cardiology; Michal Tendera, ESC; Eduardo de Teresa Galván, SSC; Pilar Tornos, SSC; Lucia Torracca, ESC Working Group Cardiovascular Surgery; Panos Vardas, ESC; Christian Vrints, Belgian Society of Cardiology; William Wijns, ESC; José Luis Zamorano, SSC; Antonio Zaza, ESC Working Group Cardiac Cellular Electrophysiology; Parounak Zelveian, Armenian Cardiologists Association.
The contribution of Victoria Cañadas-Godoy, Pablo García-Pavia, Paquita Burgos, Sharon Legendre, and Antonio Carballal to the organization of the conference is acknowledged, as well as the comments and suggestions of Cayetano Permanyer to this manuscript.
The European Conference on the Future of Cardiology was supported by an unrestricted educational grant by Bayer HealthCare.
Conflict of interest: none declared.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
- Kesteloot H, Sans S, Kromhout D. (2006) Dynamics of cardiovascular and all-cause mortality in Western and Eastern Europe between 1970 and 2000. Eur Heart J 27:107113.
[Abstract/Free Full Text] - Kattainen A, Salomaa V, Harkanen T, Jula A, Kaaja R, Kesaniemi YA, Kahonen M, Moilanen L, Nieminen MS, Aromaa A, Reunanen A. (2006) Coronary heart disease: from a disease of middle-aged men in the late 1970s to a disease of elderly women in the 2000s. Eur Heart J 27:296301.
[Abstract/Free Full Text] - Leal J, Luengo-Fernandez R, Gray A, Petersen S, Rayner M. (2006) Economic burden of cardiovascular diseases in the enlarged European Union. Eur Heart J 27:16101619.
[Abstract/Free Full Text] - Ryden L, Stokoe G, Breithardt G, Lindemans F, Potgieter A. (2004) Task Force 2 of the Cardiovascular Round Table of the European Society of Cardiology. Patient access to medical technology across Europe. Eur Heart J 25:611616.
[Abstract/Free Full Text] - de Teresa Galvan E, Alonso-Pulpon L, Barber P, Bover Freire R, Castro Beiras A, Cruz Fernandez JM, Fernandez Aviles F, Garcia de Lara J, Gonzalez Valcarcel B, Martin Luengo C, Plaza Celemin L, del Pozo Crespo F, Triola Fort M. (2006) Imbalance between the supply and demand for cardiologists in Spain. Analysis of the current situation, future prospects, and possible solutions. Rev Esp Cardiol 59:703717.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
- Block P, Weber H, Kearney P. (19992000) Cardiology section of the UEMS. Manpower in cardiology II in Western and Central Europe. Eur Heart J 2003 24:299310.
- Fraser AG, Buser PT, Bax JJ, Dassen WR, Nihoyannopoulos P, Schwitter J, Knuuti JM, Hoher M, Bengel F, Szatmari A. (2006) The future of cardiovascular imaging and non-invasive diagnosis. A joint statement from the European Association of Echocardiography, the Working Groups on Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance, Computers in Cardiology, and Nuclear Cardiology, of the European Society of Cardiology, the European Association of Nuclear Medicine, and the Association for European Paediatric Cardiology. Eur Heart J 27:17501753.
[Abstract/Free Full Text] - Core curriculum for the general cardiologist. (2006) The European Society of Cardiology. http://www.escardio.org/knowledge/education/coresyllabus.
- Sheridan DJ. (2006) Reversing the decline of academic medicine in Europe. Lancet 367:16981701.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
- Bassand JP, Priori S, Tendera M. (2005) Evidence-based vs. 'impressionist' medicine: how best to implement guidelines. Eur Heart J 26:11551158.
[Abstract/Free Full Text] - Flynn MR, Barrett C, Cosio FG, Gitt AK, Wallentin L, Kearney P, Lonergan M, Shelley E, Simoons ML. (2005) The Cardiology Audit and Registration Data Standards (CARDS), European data standards for clinical cardiology practice. Eur Heart J 26:308313.
[Abstract/Free Full Text] - Graham IM, Stewart M, Hertog MG. on behalf of the Cardiovascular Round Table Task Force. (2006) Factors impeding the implementation of cardiovascular prevention guidelines: findings from a survey conducted by the European Society of Cardiology. Eur J Cardiovasc Prev Rehabil 13:839845.[CrossRef][Medline]
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
C. J. M. Vrints Acute coronary syndrome in the elderly Eur. Heart J., May 2, 2008; 29(10): 1213 - 1214. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
