Skip Navigation


European Heart Journal Advance Access originally published online on May 19, 2008
European Heart Journal 2008 29(12):1478-1480; doi:10.1093/eurheartj/ehn226
This Article
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
29/12/1478    most recent
ehn226v1
Right arrow E-letters: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when E-letters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Related articles in EHJ
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Pachón, M.
Right arrow Articles by Zamorano, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Pachón, M.
Right arrow Articles by Zamorano, J.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Published on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology. All rights reserved. © The Author 2008. For permissions please email: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

Mitral annular calcifications and aortic valve stenosis

M. Pachón and J. Zamorano*

Cardiovascular Institute, Hospital Clinico San Carlos, Madrid, Spain

* Corresponding author. Tel: +34 913303290, Fax: +34-91-3303292, Email: jlzamorano{at}vodafone.es

This editorial refers to ‘Association of mitral annular calcification and aortic valve morphology: a substudy of the aortic stenosis progression observation measuring effects of rosuvastatin (ASTRONOMER) study’ {dagger} by D.S. Jassal et al., on page 1542


Footnotes

The opinions expressed in this article are not necessarily those of the Editors of the European Heart Journal or of the European Society of Cardiology.

{dagger} doi:10.1093/eurheartj/ehn172 Back

Idiopathic mitral annular calcification (MAC) is one of the most common cardiac abnormalities found in autopsies, occurring twice as often in females than in males. It has been reported in 6.1% of the subjects that undergo a routine echocardiogram,1 and the incidence rises sharply with age. The primary pathological event in its development is considered to be a fibrillar alteration of the collagen ultrastructure that triggers lipid deposition and calcification within the annulus. Although it was initially thought that the presence of calcification of the mitral annulus had few functional consequences in most hearts, this is not the case. Patients with MAC have been shown to be at a higher risk of conduction disturbances, cardiovascular disease, and total cardiac death. Calcified aortic valve disease is also very common. The overall prevalence is 13% and increases up to 25% in adults >65 years old. Until recently, aortic calcification was thought to be caused by a passive accumulation of calcium along the aortic valve leaflet. However, there are a growing number of studies showing similarities among vascular atherosclerosis and degenerative changes in aortic and mitral valves. For instance, there is a high degree of endothelial injury in the development of calcified aortic valve disease.2 Furthermore, histological analysis of mild aortic sclerotic valves has shown a chronic inflammatory process with macrophage and T lymphocyte migration as well as lipid accumulation. A correlation has also been demonstrated between serum high sensitivity C-reactive protein (hsCRP) levels and the severity of aortic valve stenosis.3 These experimental observations endorse epidemiological and clinical studies that have shown an association among clinical risk factors, both calcification of the mitral annulus and aortic valve and systemic calcified atherosclerosis.4 Therefore, these convincing data support the hypothesis that cardiac valve calcification is an active biological process due to atherosclerosis that could be targeted with medical therapy to prevent or slow disease progression. Aiming to confirm this hypothesis, several studies have evaluated the effects of statins and angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEIs) in this process. The majority have shown a significant reduction in disease progression under statin therapy.

The magnitude of these effects was assessed by measuring the annual increase in valve calcium,5 the increase of the peak gradient,6 or the decrease in valve area by Doppler echocardiography.7,8 More recently, Rosenhek et al.9 studied the effects of ACEIs, statins, and their combination on the haemodynamic progression of aortic stenosis (AS). They concluded that only statin therapy appears to reduce the progression of both mild to moderate and severe AS. However, they also observed an unexpected marked discordance between serum lipid levels and haemodynamic disease progression, which suggests that the effect of statins may be due to anti-inflammatory properties rather than lipid-lowering effects. A recent survey by Moura and colleagues10 looked prospectively at the effect of rosuvastatin on the progression of moderate to severe AS. After a mean follow-up of 73 ± 24 weeks, they found that the group of patients under statin therapy showed a significant reduction In the progression of AS. Additionally, the authors described a correlation among the improvement in peak jet velocity, mean gradient, and aortic valve area with the change in low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol levels. The RAAVE study (Rosuvastatin Affecting Aortic Valve Endothelium) was the first prospective study to demonstrate the beneficial effect of statin therapy in AS. Currently, ongoing randomized trials will provide further evidence on the treatment of this complex disease.

The Simvastatin and Ezetimibe in Aortic Stenosis (SEAS) study11 is a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicentre ongoing trial investigating the effect of intensive lipid-lowering therapy on the progression of mild to moderate AS. The SEAS study will be the largest randomized trial to evaluate whether therapy with 40 mg of simvastatin and 10 mg of ezetimibe (vs placebo) can retard the progression of aortic valve stenosis and, thereby, defer surgery, relieve adverse consequences of AS, and possibly decrease mortality and morbidity in these patients.

Although both the ASTRONOMER and SEAS studies included similar echocardiographic variables, the SEAS study enrolled a larger population of patients (n = 1873 vs n = 272) and had longer treatment duration (4–7 vs 3–5 years). Moreover, primary efficacy end-points of the SEAS study included aortic valve surgery, ischaemic vascular events, and cardiovascular mortality. Altogether, the ASTRONOMER and SEAS studies should help to determine whether intensive lipid-lowering treatment: (i) confers cardioprotective benefits in AS patients; and (ii) if such benefits exist, when this treatment should be commenced. The ongoing trials will help in assessing the uncertainties raised by prior clinical studies regarding lipid-lowering therapy in AS patients.

Jassal and colleagues12 evaluated the association of baseline MAC with aortic valve morphology in an observational substudy of asymptomatic patients enrolled in the ASTRONOMER trial. Transthoracic echocardiography was performed in the 219 patients, and the study population was divided into bicuspid and tricuspid aortic valves. Echo measurements included left ventricular dimensions, aortic root dimension, MAC, and aortic valve calcification. The degree of valve calcification was semi-quantitated based on severity (from absent to severe). The results convincingly demonstrated a significantly higher degree of MAC in patients with tricuspid aortic valve after adjusting for age and systolic blood pressure. The authors concluded that in patients with asymptomatic mild to moderate AS, MAC is more prevalent in those individuals with a tricuspid aortic valve, independently of age and systolic blood pressure.

As outlined above, MAC and aortic valve calcification represent a chronic, degenerative process in the fibrous skeleton of the heart that has been associated with atherosclerosis. This process may accelerate when mechanical stress is increased, as it usually occurs in hypertension and congenital or acquired valvular disorders. There are some studies that suggested an association of MAC with AS. Their main aim was clarifying if MAC and aortic valve calcification are the result of a primary degenerative process that increases with age, an expression of generalized atherosclerosis, or the outcome of increased valvular stress. With regard to the third hypothesis; Fulkerson et al.13 reported in 1979 that chronic increase of left ventricular pressures, as it presents in AS and hypertension, led to acceleration of the degenerative process.

More recently, Movahed et al.1 evaluated the associations between MAC and cardiac abnormalities using a large echocardiographic database. For this purpose they retrospectively reviewed 24 380 echocardiograms and they found that age, left ventricular hypertrophy, mitral regurgitation, tricuspid regurgitation, aortic stenosis, left atrial enlargement, and reverse E/A ratio were independently associated with MAC. MAC was present in 14.8% of patients with AS vs 5.5% without AS. These findings suggest that MAC could play an important role in the pathogenesis of AS, which endorses the observation of Fukerson et al.13 Furthermore, identification of MAC may serve as a marker for other cardiac structural disorders.

Nevertheless, it is crucial to consider that the study by Jassal et al. is an observational substudy of the ASTRONOMER study, which was not designed to contemplate an association between MAC and aortic valve morphology. Therefore, the results must be interpreted warily. In any case, the unique feature of the study of Jassal et al. is that it is pioneer in describing the relationship between the degree of valvular calcification and the valve morphology. Tricuspid and bicuspid valvular diseases are two different processes with different epidemiology and pathophysiological mechanisms. Whereas the mean age for bicuspid calcific stenosis that has been reported at operation is 64 years, for tricuspid calcific stenosis it is 73 years.14 The gender distribution also differs: the former is male predominant and the latter is female. Furthermore, in bicuspid valves, calcification develops within the fibrous core of the cusp, whereas in tricuspid valves the process begins on the aortic face of the cusps. Finally, the presence of coronary disease was doubly frequent in tricuspid valves when compared with bicuspid valves, independently of age. These observations suggest that the role of atherosclerosis and plasma lipid levels in the development of AS is more significant in tricuspid than in bicuspid valves. This is in agreement with the study of Jassal et al. which demonstrated that in patients with mild to moderate AS, there was more extensive MAC in those with tricuspid aortic valves than in those with bicuspid ones.

According to these data, we should carefully evaluate the presence of cardiovascular risk factors in all our patients, and with special attention to those presenting with MAC, as this could be a marker of further cardiac disorders and atherosclerosis. Future studies will probably provide additional evidence for this hypothesis and, more importantly, will delucidate whether the degree of MAC can predict the response to statins in patients with AS.

Conflict of interest: none declared

Footnotes

The opinions expressed in this article are not necessarily those of the Editors of the European Heart Journal or of the European Society of Cardiology.

{dagger} doi:10.1093/eurheartj/ehn172 Back

References

  1. Movahed M-R, Saito Y, Ahmadi-Kashan M, Ebrahimi R. Mitral annulus calcification is associated with valvular and cardiac structural abnormalities. Cardiovasc Ultrasound (2007) 5:14.[CrossRef][Medline]
  2. Mohler ER III. Mechanisms of aortic valve calcification. Am J Cardiol (2004) 94:1396–1402.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
  3. Galante A, Pietroiusti IA, Vellini M, Piccolo P, Possati G, De Bonis M, Grillo RL, Fontana C, Favalli C. C-reactive protein is increased in patients with degenerative aortic valvular stenosis. J Am Coll Cardiol (2001) 34:1078–1081.
  4. Allison MA, Cheung P, Criqui MH, Langer RD, Wright CM. Mitral and aortic annular calcification are highly associated with systemic calcified atherosclerosis. Circulation (2006) 113:861–866.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  5. Pohle K, Maffert R, Ropers D, Moshage W, Stilianakis N, Daniel WG, Achenbach S. Progression of aortic valve calcification: association with coronary atherosclerosis and cardiovascular risk factors. Circulation (2001) 104:1927–1932.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  6. Aronow WS, Ahn C, Kronzon I, Goldman ME. Association of coronary risk factors and use of statins with progression of mild valvular aortic stenosis in older persons. Am J Cardiol (2001) 88:693–695.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
  7. Novaro GM, Tiong IY, Pearce GL, Lauer MS, Sprecher DL, Griffin BP. Effect of hydroxymethylglutaryl coenzyme A reductase inhibitors on the progression of calcific aortic stenosis. Circulation (2001) 104:2205–2209.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  8. Bellamy MF, Pellikka PA, Klarich KW, Tajik AJ, Enriquez-Sarano M. Association of cholesterol levels, hydroxymethylglutaryl coenzyme-A reductase inhibitor treatment, and progression of aortic stenosis in the community. J Am Coll Cardiol (2002) 40:1723–1730.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  9. Rosenhek R, Rader F, Loho N, Gabriel H, Heger M, Klaar U, Schemper M, Binder T, Maurer G, Baumgartner H. Statins but not angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors delay progression of aortic stenosis. Circulation (2004) 110:1291–1295.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  10. Moura LM, Ramos SF, Zamorano JL, Barros IM, Azevedo LF, Rocha-Gonçalves F, Rajamannan NM. Rosuvastatin affecting aortic valve endothelium to slow the progresión of aortic stenosis. J Am Coll Cardiol (2007) 49:554–561.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  11. Rossebø AB, Pedersen TR, Allen C, et al. Design and baseline characteristics of the simvastatin and ezetimibe in aortic stenosis (SEAS) study. Am J Cardiol (2007) 99:970–973.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
  12. Jassal DS, Tam JW, Bhagirath KM, Gaboury I, Sochowski RA, Dumesnil JG, Giannoccaro PJ, Jue J, Pandey AS, Joyner CD, Teo KK, Chan KL. Association of mitral annular calcification and aortic valve morphology: a substudy of the aortic stenosis progresion observation measuring effects of rosuvastatin (ASTRONOMER) study. Eur Heart J (2008) 29:1542–1547. First published on April 28, 2008. doi:10.1093/eurheartj/ehn172.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  13. Fulkerson PK, Beaver BM, Auseon JC, Graber HL. Calcification of the mitral annulus: etiology, clinical associations, complications and therapy. Am J Med (1979) 66:967–977.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
  14. Davies MJ, Treasure T, Parker DJ. Demographic characteristics of patients undergoing aortic valve replacement for stenosis: relation to valve morphology. Heart (1996) 75:174–178.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?

Related articles in EHJ:

Association of mitral annular calcification and aortic valve morphology: a substudy of the aortic stenosis progression observation measuring effects of rosuvastatin (ASTRONOMER) study
Davinder S. Jassal, James W. Tam, Kapil M. Bhagirath, Isabelle Gaboury, Randall A. Sochowski, Jean G. Dumesnil, Peter J. Giannoccaro, John Jue, A. Shekhar Pandey, Campbell D. Joyner, Koon K. Teo, and Kwan L. Chan
EHJ 2008 29: 1542-1547. [Abstract] [FREE Full Text]  

Association of mitral annular calcification and aortic valve morphology: a substudy of the aortic stenosis progression observation measuring effects of rosuvastatin (ASTRONOMER) study
Davinder S. Jassal, James W. Tam, Kapil M. Bhagirath, Isabelle Gaboury, Randall A. Sochowski, Jean G. Dumesnil, Peter J. Giannoccaro, John Jue, A. Shekhar Pandey, Campbell D. Joyner, Koon K. Teo, and Kwan L. Chan
EHJ 2008 29: 1542-1547. [Abstract] [FREE Full Text]  




This Article
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
29/12/1478    most recent
ehn226v1
Right arrow E-letters: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when E-letters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Related articles in EHJ
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Pachón, M.
Right arrow Articles by Zamorano, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Pachón, M.
Right arrow Articles by Zamorano, J.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?