Skip Navigation



European Heart Journal Advance Access published online on March 29, 2007

European Heart Journal, doi:10.1093/eurheartj/ehm043
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
28/8/1033    most recent
ehm043v1
Right arrow E-letters: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when E-letters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Boshoff, D. E.
Right arrow Articles by Meyns, B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Boshoff, D. E.
Right arrow Articles by Meyns, B.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The European Society of Cardiology 2007. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

Endovascular stenting of juvenile vessels: consequence of surgical stent removal on vessel architecture

Derize Elizabeth Boshoff1, Noëlla Bethuyne2, Marc Gewillig1, Luc Mertens1, Benedicte Eyskens1, Ishan Bakir2, Eric Verbeken3, Willem Daenen2 and Bart Meyns2,*

1 Department of Paediatric Cardiology, University Hospital Leuven, 49 Herestreet, B 3000 Leuven, Belgium
2 Department of Cardiac Surgery, University Hospital Leuven, Belgium
3 Department of Pathology, University Hospital Leuven, Belgium

* Corresponding author. Tel: +32 16 343865; fax: +32 16 343891. E-mail address: bart.meyns{at}uz.kuleuven.ac.be


    Abstract
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 Conclusion
 Acknowledgements
 References
 
Aims: To investigate the effect of stenting and later surgical removal on the architecture and therefore growth potential of juvenile vessels.

Methods and results: Stents were implanted in the carotid artery and jugular vein of six 6-week-old lambs. Ten weeks later, stents were excised and the vessels closed without the use of patch material. After another 10 weeks, the vessel size (treated and untreated control side) was measured angiographically and the animals terminated for histology. All arteries were patent: treated arterial size was 9 ± 1 mm compared with 11 ± 1 mm on the control side (P = ns). Two veins were completely occluded and two severely stenosed; vessel size was smaller compared with the control side (8 ± 8 vs. 14 ± 5 mm; P = 0.02). Preserved vessel wall integrity was observed in both arteries and veins (except for local rupture of the internal elastic lamina with neointimal formation in two arteries leading to mild stenosis).

Conclusion: Vessel wall architecture remains well preserved after surgical removal of stents implanted in juvenile arteries and veins. However, stenting and subsequent surgical removal results in a high risk of venous thrombosis (probably due to the lower blood velocity, lower pressure, and the absence of pulsatility in venous vessels).

Key Words: Stents • Congenital heart disease • Vessel architecture • Stenosis


    Introduction
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 Conclusion
 Acknowledgements
 References
 
Intravascular stents are an ideal adjunct for treatment of stenosis not responsive to balloon angioplasty and have been used successfully in pediatric patients with stenosis of the pulmonary artery, stenosis of the great veins, and post-operative stenosis of Fontan anastomosis.1 Re-expansion of stents has been shown to be feasible and safe even up to 3 years after implantation.2,3 However, placement of stents (e.g. in pulmonary arterial lesions and aortic arch stenosis) has limitations in infants and small children due to stent inflexibility, requirement for large sheaths, and concerns about creating fixed obstructions after the placement of small diameter stents in growing patients. Smaller stents with maximal achievable diameters of 9–10 mm therefore commit the patient to future surgery to enlarge the stented area once it has been dilated to its maximal diameter.4 The surgical removal of a stent is an aggressive procedure with possible destruction of the vessel wall.

This study originates from our clinical concern that stent removal could scar the vessel wall to the extent that further growth is limited. The objective of this experimental study was therefore to investigate the effect of stent implantation and later surgical removal on the architecture and therefore growth potential of juvenile vessels.


    Methods
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 Conclusion
 Acknowledgements
 References
 
Experimental protocol
Institutional ethical committee (Catholic University of Leuven) approval was obtained to perform this study in sheep. Six weaned lambs (6 weeks old) were selected to undergo stent implantation in both the carotid artery and the jugular vein. A power calculation could not be performed as no information is available on incidences of the investigated subject. We therefore selected our sample size according to previous experience: a complete observation set of six animals was considered sufficient to correct for biological variability in a single endpoint, controlled prospective animal trial. The ethical restraints in the use of chronic animal experimentation had to be considered as well (each test takes 6 months).

The mean weight of the animals was 18 ± 2.2 kg. All procedures were performed under general anaesthesia. Anaesthesia was induced with ketamine hydrochloride (15 mg/kg) and maintained with fluothane. We preferred the jugular vein and carotid artery because of the surgical accessibility and the fact that the untreated side could be used for comparison as control. Between procedures, the animals were returned to the farm and no drugs were administered. The stent implantations were performed through femoral access. An angiogram was taken in order to identify the required stent size. The arterial stents were implanted first and the side that was first entered with the catheter was used for stent implantation (therefore leading to a random allocation: four stents left and two stents right). For practical reasons, the same side was taken for the jugular vein to allow the surgeon to retrieve the stents through one surgical incision. A total of six venous and six arterial stents were implanted. Venous stents (6 Zig CP stents, Numed, USA, manually crimped on balloon, length 28 mm) were expanded up to 12 mm (range 11–14 mm) and arterial stents (Multi-link premounted coronary stents, Guidant, Santa Clara, USA, length 15–20 mm) were expanded up to 4 or 5 mm. Stent diameter was estimated according to the vessel diameter (angiographically), therefore avoiding ‘oversizing’ of stents.

After 10 weeks (animal weight 43 ± 6.9 kg), a surgical cut-down was performed at the level of the stent implantation. The animals were heparinized, the vessels clamped, and longitudinally opened. The stents were removed in toto. The longitudinal incisions were closed with a running polypropylene suture. No patch material was used: the vessel opening was closed primary leaving only a single longitudinal surgical scar. After another 10 weeks (animal weight 55 ± 6.7 kg), angiography was performed and the affected and control sides compared with regard to vessel patency and diameter. Arterial access was obtained femorally and an aortogram performed for measurement of the carotid arteries. Venous angiography was performed via peripheral contrast injections from both ears comparing venous drainage to the treated and untreated jugular veins. Calibration for measurements was done using the angiographic catheter. The animals were subsequently terminated and the vessels dissected proximal and distal to the previously stented area. The complete segments were resected and submitted for histological analysis.

Histological analysis
The segments were transversally cut into 5 mm-thick tissue specimens and from each block a series of 4 µm sections were prepared in a standard way for histological examination. The samples were stained with haematoxylin–eosin and elastic stains to identify the integrity of the elastic lamina. The internal elastic lamina is generally more pronounced in arteries than in the corresponding veins; therefore, arterial injury was defined as destruction of the internal elastic lamina and venous injury was defined as a discontinuity of the media. The percentage of lumen patency was scored.

Data
Continuous data are presented with their mean value and standard deviation. The non-parametric Wilcoxon signed-rank test was performed (Statistica Software package, Tulsa, USA). A P < 0.05 was considered to indicate a significant difference.


    Results
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 Conclusion
 Acknowledgements
 References
 
Arteries
Table 1 summarizes the vessel diameter (evaluated angiographically) and vessel patency (scored histological) in comparison with the control side 10 weeks after surgical stent removal. The vessel diameter is slightly smaller than the control side. There is only mild stenosis in two cases (up to 30%). Histological analysis (Figure 1A) illustrates preserved arterial wall architecture. There is no specific injury. The two cases with mild stenosis are due to moderate intima hyperplasia at the level of local injury of the elastic lamina (Figure 1B).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Table 1 Angiographic diameter of control carotid artery, stented artery, and histological patency rate (10 weeks after surgical stent removal)

 

Figure 1
View larger version (103K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PowerPoint slide]
 
Figure 1 (A) Overview of a carotid artery 10 weeks after removal of stent: partial disruption of the internal elastic lamina is observed. Neointima formation results in a reduction of the lumen to 70% of its original size. (Elastic Van Gieson stain x25). (B) Detail of the same case. Between the media (right upper corner) and the neointima, residual parts of the internal elastic lamina is seen. (haematoxylin–eosin x200).

 
Veins
Table 2 summarizes the vessel diameter (evaluated angiographically) and vessel patency (scored histological) in comparison with the control side 10 weeks after surgical stent removal. Two veins proved to be completely occluded and two severely stenosed. The overall size of the veins was significantly smaller when compared with the control side (P = 0.02). Histological analysis shows a preserved media of the vein wall in the four non-occluded vessels (Figure 2A). The two occluded vessels proved to contain thrombus. Amazingly, their vessel wall architecture was as well preserved (Figure 2B) as the non-occluded vessels. The lumens of the two severely stenosed vessels were filled with thrombus, but recanalization had occurred, as histologically documented by the presence of newly formed vessel lumens within the occluding thrombus.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Table 2 Angiographic diameter of control jugular vein, treated vein, and histological patency rate (10 weeks after surgical stent removal)

 

Figure 2
View larger version (94K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PowerPoint slide]
 
Figure 2 (A) Overview of a normal jugular vein. The wall architecture is well preserved. (Elastic Van Gieson stain x12.5). (B) Overview of a thrombosed vein with recanalization 10 weeks after removal of stent. In the upper area, partial disruption of the entire wall is seen. (haematoxylin–eosin x12.5).

 

    Discussion
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 Conclusion
 Acknowledgements
 References
 
In the management of congenital heart disease, balloon-expandable stents have been used with success for obstructive vascular lesions that tend to recoil or collapse after dilatation.1,3,5,6 However, stent implantation in stenotic vessels of infants and small children can be problematic because there is no ideal stent model that is small enough to be easily introduced into the infant femoral vein or artery and, at the same time, large enough to be re-dilated during growth to adult vessel diameters.7 Such implants can be life saving, though in the immediate post-operative period and in some instances the interventional cardiologist has no other option but to commit the patient to later surgical removal of a stent.8,9 In patients with univentricular hearts, for example, a combined surgical and interventional strategy is often needed to optimize the growth of structures. Stent implantation in hypoplastic pulmonary arteries after a bidirectional cavopulmonary connection is sometimes necessary in order to address clinical problems such as venous congestion and severe cyanosis. These stents usually have to be excised during completion of the Fontan operation.

Surgical removal of a stent is an aggressive procedure with possible destruction of the vessel wall to such an extent that the further growth potential is limited. In this experimental study, it is shown that vessel wall architecture remains remarkably well preserved on histopathological examination. All arteries were patent, but four out of six veins were thrombosed. We hypothesize that the surgical trauma caused by the endarterectomy results in a higher risk for thrombosis in a non-pulsatile, low blood velocity and low-pressure environment. The pulmonary artery has a high blood velocity in the normal circulation. After a bidirectional or total cavopulmonary connection, a non-pulsatile, low flow, and low pressure circulation is created, possibly simulating venous type flow. These findings suggest that anti-aggregate treatment and/or anticoagulation might be indicated in this clinical setting. It cannot be excluded though that the morphology of the vessel wall itself may also play a role in the increased venous thrombosis risk after stent removal.

Limitations of the study
Stents were implanted in non-stenosed vessels. Stent expansion with mild stretch of vessel (as in this series) will therefore not disrupt vessel architecture; however, such disrupture may be the case when stents are expanded in stenosed vessels.

A comparison is made between the jugular vein and the carotid artery and the response of growth of the vessel after stenting. There are no stents available that are suitable for use in both small arteries and large veins and therefore stents of different designs had to be used (CP stents in the jugular veins and multi-link premounted coronary stents in the carotid arteries). The difference in stent design and stent material introduces a variable which is difficult to evaluate, as it is theoretically possible that different metallic properties of stents may induce a different type of response in a vessel. It is our experience from clinical practice though that intimal proliferation (with in-stent stenosis) tends to develop more in smaller stents, than in larger stents. CP stents (used in the jugular veins in this study) are often used for stenting coarctation of the aorta in adult patients and has never caused any in-stent thrombosis or significant in-stent stenosis due to intimal proliferation. However, when coronary stents are used in smaller arteries, i.e. aorto-pulmonary collaterals, in-stent stenosis due to intimal proliferation is often seen.


    Conclusion
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 Conclusion
 Acknowledgements
 References
 
Vessel wall architecture remains well preserved after surgical removal of stents implanted in juvenile arteries and veins. However, stenting and subsequent surgical removal results in a high risk of venous thrombosis.

Anti-aggregate treatment and/or anticoagulation might therefore be indicated after stent removal in the low flow and low-pressure environment (bidirectional/total cavopulmonary connections).

Future perspectives
Surgery because of mismatch of stent size and vessel growth during development may hopefully be avoided in future with the use of biodegradable stents1013 and the development of the so-called breakable stents in infants and children.14 These stents are still experimental and the biodegradable stents are currently only available up to a maximum diameter of 3.5 mm, which limits the use in older infants and children.


    Acknowledgements
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 Conclusion
 Acknowledgements
 References
 
Partly sponsored by the Belgian Foundation for Research in Paediatric Cardiology.

Conflict of interest: none declared.


    Footnotes
 
This paper was guest edited by Prof. Per G. Bjornstad, Rikshospitalet – The National Hospital, Paediatric Cardiology, Sognsvannsveien, Oslo, Norway


    References
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 Conclusion
 Acknowledgements
 References
 

  1. O'Laughlin MP, Slack MC, Grifka RG, Perry SB, Lock JE, Mullins CE. (1993) Implantation and intermediate-term follow-up of stents in congenital heart disease. Circulation 88:605–614.
  2. Morrow WR, Palmaz JC, Tio FO, Ehler WJ, VanDellen AF, Mullins CE. (1993) Re-epansion of balloon-expandable stents after growth. J Am Coll Cardiol 22:2007–2013.[Abstract]
  3. Ing FF, Grifka RG, Nihill MR, Mullins CE. (1995) Repeat dilation of intravascular stents in congenital heart defects. Circulation 92:893–897.
  4. Trivedi KR and Benson LN. (2003) Interventional strategies in the management of peripheral pulmonary artery stenosis. J Interv Cardiol 16:171–188.[Medline]
  5. O'Laughlin MP, Perry SB, Lock JE, Mullins CE. (1991) Use of endovascular stents in congenital heart disease. Circulation 83:1923–1939.
  6. Fogelman R, Nykanen D, Smallhorn JF, McCrindle BW, Freedom RM, Benson LM. (1995) Endovascular stents in the pulmonary circulation—clinical impact on management and medium-term follow-up. Circulation 92:881–885.
  7. Ewert P, Riesenkampff E, Neuss M, Kretschmar O, Nagdyman N, Lange P. (2004) Novel growth stent for the permanent treatment of vessel stenosis in growing children: an experimental study. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 62:506–510.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
  8. Trivedi KR, Azakie A, Benson LN. (2001) Collaborative interventional and surgical strategies in the management of congenital heart lesions. Semin Thorac Cardiovasc Surg Pediatr Card Surg Annu 4:185–207.[CrossRef][Medline]
  9. Mullins CE. (2000) Light at the end of the tunnel—but still dim. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 51:450.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
  10. Peuster M, Wohlsein P, Brügmann M, Ehlerding M, Seidler K, Fink C, Brauer H, Fischer A, Hausdorf G. (2001) A novel approach to temporary stenting: degradable cardiovascular stents produced from corrodible metal—results 6-618 months after implantation into New Zealand white rabbits. Heart 56:563–569.
  11. Griffiths H, Peeters P, Verbist J, Bosiers M, Deloose K, Heublein B, Rohde R, Kasese V, Ilsley C, Di Mario C. (2004) Future devices: bioabsorbable stents. Br J Cardiol (Acute Interv Cardiol) 11:AIC 80–AIC 84.
  12. Di Mario C, Griffiths H, Goktekin O, Peeters N, Verbist J, Bosiers M, Deloose K, Heublein B, Rohde R, Kasese V, Ilsley C, Erbel R. (2004) Drug-eluting bioabsorbable magnesium stent. J Interven Cardiol 17:391–395.[CrossRef][Medline]
  13. Zartner P, Cesnjevar R, Singer H, Weyand M. (2005) First successful implantation of a biodegradable metal stent into the left pulmonary artery of a preterm baby. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 66:590–594.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
  14. Sigler M, Schneider K, Meissler M, König K, Schneider M. (2006) Breakable stent for interventions in infants and neonates: an animal study and histopathological findings. Heart 92:245–248.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?



This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
28/8/1033    most recent
ehm043v1
Right arrow E-letters: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when E-letters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Boshoff, D. E.
Right arrow Articles by Meyns, B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Boshoff, D. E.
Right arrow Articles by Meyns, B.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?