Skip Navigation



European Heart Journal Advance Access published online on May 3, 2007

European Heart Journal, doi:10.1093/eurheartj/ehm113
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
28/10/1242    most recent
ehm113v1
Right arrow E-letters: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when E-letters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Assomull, R. G.
Right arrow Articles by Prasad, S. K.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Assomull, R. G.
Right arrow Articles by Prasad, S. K.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The European Society of Cardiology 2007. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

The role of cardiovascular magnetic resonance in patients presenting with chest pain, raised troponin, and unobstructed coronary arteries

Ravi G. Assomull1,2, Jonathan C. Lyne1, Niall Keenan1, Ankur Gulati1, Nicholas H. Bunce3, Simon W. Davies1, Dudley J. Pennell1,2 and Sanjay K. Prasad*

1 Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance Unit, Royal Brompton Hospital, London SW3 6NP, UK
2 National Heart and Lung Institute, Imperial College, London, UK
3 Department of Cardiology, St George's Hospital, London, UK

Received 7 October 2006; revised 13 March 2007; accepted 22 March 2007.

* Corresponding author. Tel: +44 207 351 8812; fax: +44 207 351 8816. E-mail address: s.prasad{at}rbht.nhs.uk


    Abstract
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 Conclusion
 Acknowledgements
 References
 
Aims: Troponin measurement is used in the assessment and risk stratification of patients presenting acutely with chest pain when the main cause of elevation is coronary artery disease. However, some patients have no coronary obstruction on angiography, leading to diagnostic uncertainty. We evaluated the incremental diagnostic value of cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) in these patients.

Methods and results: Sixty consecutive patients (mean age 44 years, 72% male) with a troponin-positive episode of chest pain and unobstructed coronary arteries were recruited within 3 months of initial presentation. All patients underwent CMR with cine imaging, T2-weighted imaging for detection of inflammation, and late gadolinium enhancement imaging for detection of infarction/fibrosis. An identifiable basis for troponin elevation was established in 65% of patients. The commonest underlying cause was myocarditis (50%), followed by myocardial infarction (11.6%) and cardiomyopathy (3.4%). In the 35% of patients where no clear diagnosis was identified by CMR, significant myocardial infarction/fibrosis was excluded.

Conclusion: CMR is a valuable adjunct to conventional investigations in a diagnostically challenging and important group of patients with troponin-positive chest pain and unobstructed coronary arteries.

Key Words: Magnetic resonance • Acute coronary syndromes troponin • Myocarditis • Coronary angiography


    Introduction
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 Conclusion
 Acknowledgements
 References
 
Troponin measurement is used routinely in the assessment and risk stratification of patients presenting acutely with chest pain. It can accurately predict the presence of acute coronary syndromes (ACS) in coronary artery disease (CAD).1,2 The magnitude of troponin elevation reflects the complexity of the atherosclerotic lesions and guides risk stratification for death and re-infarction.36 However, in a small but important subgroup of patients presenting with chest pain and an elevated troponin, subsequent coronary angiography reveals normal or non-flow-limiting CAD.7,8 These patients present a difficult diagnostic dilemma.9,10 There are a number of potential causes of this scenario, including non-cardiac aetiologies, myocardial infarction with a recanalized coronary artery, and acute myocarditis.7,11

In patients with ACS, antithrombotic, antiplatelet, and interventional therapies are important, but no data support the role of these therapies in the management of patients with a non-thrombotic syndrome. For this reason, defining the underlying cause of the clinical presentation is important and further investigation is justified, as lack of an accurate diagnosis is likely to result in patients not receiving appropriate treatment and/or follow-up. The current lack of diagnostic certainty may in turn explain why this cohort of patients has been shown to have a poorer prognosis.12,13

In order to establish the underlying cause for the troponin elevation, cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) offers a potential opportunity due to its ability to non-invasively identify areas of in vivo inflammation and replacement fibrosis with a high spatial resolution. Using a combination of available sequences, CMR is able to distinguish between different causative aetiologies including acute infarction, myocarditis, and other cardiomyopathies.1418 We therefore hypothesized that CMR would offer incremental value in determining the underlying aetiology.


    Methods
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 Conclusion
 Acknowledgements
 References
 
Patient population
Sixty-four consecutive patients presenting with new-onset chest pain (present at rest, lasting for longer than 30 min), an elevated troponin, and unobstructed coronary arteries on X-ray angiography were prospectively recruited between December 2003 and February 2006. Consecutive patients were recruited from patients referred to the CMR unit at Royal Brompton Hospital. Referrals were made from 18 separate hospitals which regularly use the CMR facilities at Royal Brompton Hospital. No patients had undergone coronary intervention, and other initial investigations including transthoracic echocardiography had proved diagnostically inconclusive. Physicians referred patients for CMR to exclude myocardial infarction and to provide an alternative diagnosis which would explain the clinical presentation. All CMR scans were performed during the inpatient admission or within 3 months of initial presentation. Coronary angiograms were performed in all patients prior to enrolment and subsequent CMR scanning. Patients with a history of chronic troponin elevation were excluded, as were any patients with standard contraindications to CMR (one patient excluded due to severe claustrophobia). Any patients with a prior cardiac history, for example, of myocarditis, myocardial infarction, or impaired LV function (three patients), were also excluded. Following exclusions, the final cohort comprised 60 patients. The study was approved by the local Ethics Committee. Written consent was obtained from all patients.

Cardiovascular magnetic resonance
CMR (Siemens Sonata 1.5T, Erlangen, Germany) was performed using steady-state, free precession breath-hold cines echo time (TE)/repetition time (TR) (1.6/3.2 ms, flip angle 60°) in long-axis planes and sequential 7 mm short-axis slices (3 mm gap) from the atrioventricular ring to the apex. T2-weighted images (triple inversion recovery; TE: 60 ms, TR: 2 x R–R interval, TI: 170 ms, slice thickness 7–15 mm, flip angle: 180°, pixel size 2.3 x 1.3 mm) were acquired in the same long- and short-axis planes. Finally, late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) images were acquired 10 min after intravenous gadolinium-DTPA (Schering; 0.1 mmol/kg) in identical short-axis planes using an inversion-recovery gradient echo sequence. Inversion times were adjusted to null normal myocardium (typically 320–440 ms; pixel size 1.7 x 1.4 mm). LGE images were phase-swapped to exclude artefact. Ventricular volumes and function were measured for both ventricles using standard techniques1921 and analysed using semi-automated software (CMRtools, Cardiovascular Imaging Solutions, London, UK). All volumes and masses were indexed for age, gender, and body surface area (BSA).22

Cardiovascular magnetic resonance analysis
CMR scans were analysed independently by two experienced interpreters who were blinded to clinical details. Scans were reviewed with assessment of ventricular volumes and function, review of T2-weighted images for areas of high signal suggesting myocardial inflammation, and by measuring the ratio of myocardial signal intensity to skeletal muscle.23 Finally, the LGE images were assessed for subendocardial enhancement in the distribution of a coronary artery compatible with myocardial infarction18 or for midwall/subepicardial enhancement which was compatible with myocarditis in this cohort. The myocarditis group was further subclassified into acute (T2 raised) or non-acute (T2 not raised) based on the corresponding T2-weighted signal in that territory or increased global ratio. Scans with increased normalized volumes and reduced systolic function but without evidence of LGE/T2 abnormalities were categorized as dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM). Scans with completely normal range volumes and function with no LGE/T2 abnormalities were considered non-diagnostic for cause by CMR. The incremental value of CMR was expressed as the proportion of cases where LGE-CMR scans yielded a new diagnosis.

Clinical data
Clinical data including history, examination findings, troponin levels, ECG recordings, transthoracic echocardiography, and coronary angiography were reviewed by a single experienced observer prior to enrolment into the study. The primary ECG abnormality was assigned using the Minnesota code.24 ST-segment elevation was defined as the elevation of the ST-segment >1 mm in leads II, III, aVF, I, aVL, V5, and V6 or >2 mm in leads V1–V4. Readings were taken 60 ms after the J point. In addition, details of investigations for pulmonary emboli and serum electrolytes were recorded. Renal disease was defined as a reduced GFR (<90 mL/min/1.73 m2).25 Troponin assays differed between referring centres, and the recorded level was cross-checked with the upper limit of normal for the appropriate referring centre (typically 10–20% in excess of the 99th percentile value for a reference control group) to ensure they were elevated at a level to suggest significant myocardial injury. For each patient, the results of all troponin assays performed during the index admission were recorded. The peak troponin results for patients were also subdivided into categories depending on the extent of their elevation (<2 upper limit of normal (ULN), <5 ULN, <10 and >10 ULN). A ‘false positive’ troponin was considered a possibility in patients with a single troponin elevation, which was not repeated during the admission or if a single elevated troponin was followed by a second normal troponin level within 24 h.

Coronary angiograms were reviewed to ensure there were no epicardial stenoses (defined as >50% stenosis in the main- and side-branch arteries). The subsequent progress of patients was assessed by telephone contact with their primary care physician to establish whether subsequent investigations had uncovered any alternative diagnoses that were not evident on CMR.

Statistical analysis
Continuous data are expressed as a mean ± SD. Baseline characteristics were compared between subgroups using an independent sample t-test or Mann–Whitney test as appropriate. Fisher's or {chi}2 tests were used for categorical variables. All tests were two-sided. A P-value of <0.05 was deemed significant and SPSS v12 (Chicago, USA) was used for all statistical analyses.


    Results
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 Conclusion
 Acknowledgements
 References
 
Baseline characteristics
Group baseline characteristics are summarized in Table 1. The mean age of the cohort was 44 ± 17 years (71.7% male). None of the patients had a prior history of cardiac disease before presenting with acute chest pain. They had not required electrical cardioversion or undergone invasive cardiovascular investigations/treatment other than angiography. In addition, none of the recruited cohort had pre-existing renal impairment, prior exposure to cardiotoxic drugs, or prior chemotherapy/radiotherapy. At the time of the recorded troponin elevation, none of the patients had been treated for a prolonged episode of septicaemia. There was a low prevalence of cardiac risk factors. Fifty-five (91.7%) of the cohort had an abnormal ECG on presentation, with ST-segment elevation being the most commonly detected abnormality (40%). A few patients were on primary prevention therapy, with statins being the most commonly prescribed treatment. The median interval from presentation of chest pain to CMR was 14.5 days (range 1–90 days).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Table 1 Baseline characteristics

 
Incremental value of cardiovascular magnetic resonance
The range of diagnoses determined by CMR is summarized in Table 2. CMR provided a new diagnosis in 39 patients (65% of cohort). In the remaining patients, there was no detectable infarction or inflammation and no additional new diagnosis was made. There was 100% concordance of diagnosis between the two observers. Myocarditis was the most common diagnosis, which was present in 50% of the patients (Figure 1). Myocardial infarction was found in seven (11.6%) patients (Figure 1). In one female patient with a history of recent stress, CMR revealed apical ballooning with preserved basal LV function and no LGE or T2 abnormalities. A diagnosis of Takotsubo cardiomyopathy was made, and repeat CMR 3 months later showed complete normalization of LV function (Figure 2).26 In one patient, CMR revealed LV dilatation with moderate impairment of systolic function, with no evidence of detectable inflammation or fibrosis, and a diagnosis of DCM was made. Finally, one patient who presented with ECG evidence of inferior myocardial infarction had a CMR which confirmed transmural inferior myocardial infarction but also a patent foramen ovale (PFO) which was subsequently confirmed by contrast transoesophageal echocardiography (Figure 3). The infarct was presumed clinically to represent a paradoxical embolus through a PFO.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Table 2 Cardiovascular magnetic resonance findings

 

Figure 1
View larger version (119K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PowerPoint slide]
 
Figure 1 Late gadolinium enhancement-cardiovascular magnetic resonance appearances of myocardial infarction and myocarditis. (A) A cine sequence of midventricular short-axis slice in a patient with classic features of myocardial infarction with anterior, inferior, and septal wall thinning (arrows). (B) The corresponding gadolinium-enhanced image demonstrating near-transmural late enhancement of the thinned region described (arrows). (C) A T2-weighted view of the left ventricular outflow tract, a focal area of increased signal in the inferolateral left ventricular wall indicating inflammation (arrows). A corresponding gadolinium-enhanced image (D) shows patchy, predominantly epicardial late enhancement indicating fibrosis (arrows). This pattern is typical of acute myocarditis.

 

Figure 2
View larger version (109K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PowerPoint slide]
 
Figure 2 Serial late gadolinium enhancement-cardiovascular magnetic resonance in Takotsubo's cardiomyopathy. (AC) Images acquired at baseline scanning demonstrate vigorous basal systolic function with apical hypokinesia (A and B) in the absence of late gadolinium enhancement (C). A repeat scan 3 months later shows complete normalization of ventricular function (D and E), with no late enhancement detectable (F).

 

Figure 3
View larger version (81K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PowerPoint slide]
 
Figure 3 Myocardial infarction resulting from systemic embolism through a patent foramen ovale. (A and B) A gadolinium-enhanced short-axis view demonstrating transmural myocardial infarction (arrows). Cine imaging in the horizontal long axis (HLA) view shows a suspected patent foramen ovale in the inter-atrial septum (arrow), which is confirmed on bubble-contrast transoesophageal echocardiography (C and D).

 
Diagnostic vs. non-diagnostic group
Patients with a non-diagnostic CMR were defined as patients in whom CMR did not reveal any structural or myocardial tissue abnormalities. None of these scans were suboptimal in the quality of images obtained. There was no significant difference in baseline LV parameters between the groups with and without a new CMR diagnosis, except for the baseline LVEF which was lower in the new diagnosis group (56.1 ± 14.7 vs. 65.5 ± 5.6%, P = 0.007). A higher proportion of patients with a non-diagnostic CMR had a potential false-positive troponin (as defined previously) than those with a diagnosis confirmed by CMR (57 vs. 8%, P < 0.001). In addition, a significantly larger proportion of patients with a non-diagnostic CMR had troponin elevations <5 ULN when compared with those with a CMR-ascribed diagnosis (52 vs. 13%, P < 0.001).

ECG findings in the diagnostic and non-diagnostic groups are presented in Table 3. As can be seen, only tachyarrhythmias (SVT/VT) appeared to correlate with CMR findings. A significantly higher proportion of patients with a non-diagnostic CMR had a tachyarrhythmia at presentation (24 vs. 5%, P = 0.045).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Table 3 Electrocardiographic abnormalities in non-diagnostic vs. diagnostic cases

 
On follow-up of both groups at a median of 398 (range 160–736) days, no new or alternative cardiac diagnosis has been made in any patient.

Diagnosis of inflammation in acute myocarditis
Of the 30 patients diagnosed with myocarditis by CMR, 19 had evidence of acute inflammation (31.7% of total cohort) with increased midwall/epicardial T2 signal and corresponding enhancement on LGE images. Eleven patients (18.3%) were ascribed a diagnosis of non-acute myocarditis without detectable active inflammation based on the presence of midwall/epicardial LGE abnormalities and normal intensity T2 images (Table 4). However, the median interval between troponin-positive chest pain and CMR scanning was significantly shorter in the acute myocarditis group [8 (range 1–88 days) vs. 41 days (range 6–83 days), P = 0.005]. In addition, patients with a diagnosis of acute myocarditis were significantly younger than those diagnosed with non-acute myocarditis (35.2 ± 14.9 vs. 48.5 ± 19.3 years, P = 0.04). No patients in the cohort had increased T2 signal intensity in the absence of midwall/epicardial LGE.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Table 4 Acute vs. non-acute myocarditis

 
Validation of cardiovascular magnetic resonance findings
On the basis of improving clinical scenario, no patients required or underwent myocardial tissue biopsy. We rescanned four patients with a CMR diagnosis of active inflammatory myocarditis [median interscan time of 111 days (range 56–313 days)]. Repeat scans in all patients showed persistent fibrosis but diminished signal on T2 imaging (Figure 4), correlating with their clinical improvement.


Figure 4
View larger version (113K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PowerPoint slide]
 
Figure 4 Resolution of myocardial inflammation but persistent fibrosis in myocarditis. (A and B) Gadolinium-enhanced and T2-weighted images at baseline, respectively. Epicardial late enhancement can be seen in the anteroseptal wall in (A) with corresponding increased signal on the T2-weighted image in (B) (arrows). A repeat scan 3 months later shows persisting fibrosis (C) but diminished signal on T2-weighted images, indicating resolving inflammation (D).

 
Other clinical investigations
Depending on the clinical presentation and blood-gas profile, a small proportion of patients were additionally further investigated for pulmonary thromboembolism. CT pulmonary angiography was performed in three patients, all of whom did not show evidence of embolism. One patient was diagnosed with pulmonary embolism on the basis of a ventilation perfusion isotope scan.


    Discussion
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 Conclusion
 Acknowledgements
 References
 
Raised troponin levels reflect myocardial necrosis. The vast majority of patients presenting with acute chest pain, troponin elevation, and abnormal ECGs are correctly diagnosed and treated for ACS. Subsequent coronary angiography usually reveals flow-limiting epicardial stenoses.27 However, patients presenting with chest pain, an elevated troponin, and normal coronary angiography present a clinical dilemma. Further evaluation is required to establish a diagnosis and to direct treatment strategies. There are a large number of other causes of an elevated troponin in the absence of obstructive CAD, which include infarction, myocarditis, cardiomyopathy, cardiac contusion, congestive heart failure, and non-cardiac causes including pulmonary embolism, sepsis, and renal failure.

CMR is able to provide detailed information on myocardial tissue characteristics. It therefore has a potential role in evaluating the cause of troponin elevation. LGE-CMR has become the gold standard for in vivo detection of scarring associated with myocardial infarction and other non-ischaemic conditions.11,14,15,28,29 The high spatial resolution and contrast of CMR allows very small areas of infarction to be identified, which are missed by SPECT.30 Black-blood T2-weighted imaging delineates areas of myocardial oedema based on a water-excitation pulse. This sequence has been clinically used to detect oedema in acute infarction, sarcoid, myocarditis, and acute rejection following cardiac transplantation.3133 The application of excellent tissue characterization that is validated, non-invasive, and free from non-ionizing radiation makes LGE-CMR a safe and powerful tool.

Our study demonstrates that CMR can identify the basis for troponin elevation in 65% of patients presenting with ACS type symptoms but unobstructed coronary angiography. In this group, the commonest cause was myocarditis (50%), followed by myocardial infarction (11.6%). This finding is in keeping with studies using nuclear techniques identifying high rates of myocarditis in patients with troponin-positive chest pain and normal coronary arteries.9 Also importantly, significant infarction, fibrosis, or active inflammation was excluded in the remaining 35% of patients. Several studies have confirmed that the elevation of troponin in patients with ACS correlates with evidence of infarction by LGE-CMR and furthermore that the extent of elevation predicts the size of infarct.34,35 Unlike the present study, however, these studies excluded patients with normal coronaries and did not include patients with possible/suspected myocarditis.

In the subset with myocarditis, 63% of this group showed evidence of acute active inflammation as indicated by T2 imaging. These patients were scanned significantly sooner than those diagnosed with non-acute myocarditis. Previous work has demonstrated that the acute changes of oedema and fibrosis as detected by LGE-CMR correlate well with biopsy findings and increase the diagnostic yield of biopsies by guiding the site of tissue sampling.17 Moreever, serial studies in such patients also demonstrate regression of these pathological changes over time in a proportion of patients.36 In the present study, four patients who consented to a follow-up scan showed complete or partial resolution of myocardial inflammation on the repeat scanning using T2 after a period of 111 days. Therefore, if the extent of myocardial inflammation at baseline was limited, these changes may resolve following the acute period of inflammation. Failure to ensure early CMR scanning in these patients may miss any subtle changes that were present on acute admission.

Myocardial infarction was detected in 11.6% of patients, despite the presence of unobstructed coronary arteries. The mechanism of infarction in these patients may be explained by arterial recanalization, embolism, or coronary spasm. Five of these seven patients received thrombolytic therapy, which may have resulted in recanalization of the occluded vessel. In one patient, a clear source of potential embolism was identified in the form of a PFO which resulted in both systemic and pulmonary emboli highlighting the limitations of luminography. The example of Takotsubo cardiomyopathy demonstrates the additional role of CMR in characterizing a disease entity that is being increasingly recognized and where management based on the ECG and angiography alone may have resulted in the interpretation of recanalization rather than this reversible cardiomyopathy.37

CMR did not provide a clear diagnosis in 35% of patients. Patients with non-diagnostic CMR scans in this study were more likely to have a modest elevation of troponin (<5 ULN) when compared with patients with a diagnostic CMR scan. Moreover, we hypothesize that a proportion of these troponin elevations may also be biochemical false positives. Evidence for this is also provided by the fact that patients with a non-diagnostic CMR were more likely to have had a tachyarrhythmia at presentation, which had subsequently resulted in a troponin elevation which was (in retrospect) unlikely to be clinically significant.

In addition, a proportion of cases may be due to an underlying non-cardiac aetiology such as pulmonary embolism, although the confirmed incidence of this in our cohort was low. The delayed presentation for CMR scanning in part of our cohort may lead to a failure to diagnose mild inflammation without development of fibrosis in myocarditis, which was present on initial admission but subsequently resolved. Alternative explanations for troponin elevation, which do not involve tissue necrosis, have also been recently suggested.38

Limitations
Identical troponin assays were not used in this cohort, reflecting referral from different centres and hence meaningful comparisons between the extent of CMR scarring and troponin levels could not easily be made. There was no histopathological correlation of the CMR diagnosis with biopsy findings for the diagnosis of myocarditis, which is currently a typical practice in the UK. However, several studies have already established the patterns of CMR findings with histology.39,40 Finally, in patients with normal CMR scans, other important causes of a troponin elevation need to be considered, most importantly the diagnosis of pulmonary embolism, but our CMR scanning protocol was not designed for this possibility. This also has relevance in terms of potential referral bias for the CMR scan.


    Conclusion
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 Conclusion
 Acknowledgements
 References
 
This study reveals a role for CMR as an adjunct to conventional investigations in patients with troponin-positive chest pain and unobstructed coronary arteries. In our cohort, LGE-CMR provided a new diagnosis in 65% of cases and excluded significant pathology in the remainder. Further studies are required to evaluate the prognostic implications of CMR abnormalities in this cohort of patients.


    Acknowledgements
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 Conclusion
 Acknowledgements
 References
 
R.G.A. was supported by a Junior Fellowship Grant from The British Heart Foundation.

Conflict of interest: D.J.P. is a consultant to Siemens Medical Solutions and a Director of Cardiovascular Imaging Solutions.


    References
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 Conclusion
 Acknowledgements
 References
 

  1. Adams JE III, Bodor GS, Davila-Roman VG, Delmez JA, Apple FS, Ladenson JH, Jaffe AS. Cardiac troponin I. A marker with high specificity for cardiac injury. Circulation (1993) 88:101–106.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  2. Hamm CW, Goldmann BU, Heeschen C, Kreymann G, Berger J, Meinertz T. Emergency room triage of patients with acute chest pain by means of rapid testing for cardiac troponin T or troponin I. N Engl J Med (1997) 337:1648–1653.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  3. Heeschen C, van Den Brand MJ, Hamm CW, Simoons ML. Angiographic findings in patients with refractory unstable angina according to troponin T status. Circulation (1999) 100:1509–1514.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  4. Benamer H, Steg PG, Benessiano J, Vicaut E, Gaultier CJ, Aubry P, Boudvillain O, Sarfati L, Brochet E, Feldman LJ, Himbert D, Juliard JM, Assayag P. Elevated cardiac troponin I predicts a high-risk angiographic anatomy of the culprit lesion in unstable angina. Am Heart J (1999) 137:815–820.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
  5. Heidenreich PA, Alloggiamento T, Melsop K, McDonald KM, Go AS, Hlatky MA. The prognostic value of troponin in patients with non-ST elevation acute coronary syndromes: a meta-analysis. J Am Coll Cardiol (2001) 38:478–485.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  6. Antman EM, Tanasijevic MJ, Thompson B, Schactman M, McCabe CH, Cannon CP, Fischer GA, Fung AY, Thompson C, Wybenga D, Braunwald E. Cardiac-specific troponin I levels to predict the risk of mortality in patients with acute coronary syndromes. N Engl J Med (1996) 335:1342–1349.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  7. Bakshi TK, Choo MK, Edwards CC, Scott AG, Hart HH, Armstrong GP. Causes of elevated troponin I with a normal coronary angiogram. Intern Med J (2002) 32:520–525.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
  8. Mahajan N, Mehta Y, Rose M, Shani J, Lichstein E. Elevated troponin level is not synonymous with myocardial infarction. Int J Cardiol. (2005) Published online ahead of print November 9.
  9. Sarda L, Colin P, Boccara F, Daou D, Lebtahi R, Faraggi M, Nguyen C, Cohen A, Slama MS, Steg PG, Le Guludec D. Myocarditis in patients with clinical presentation of myocardial infarction and normal coronary angiograms. J Am Coll Cardiol (2001) 37:786–792.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  10. Roongsritong C, Warraich I, Bradley C. Common causes of troponin elevations in the absence of acute myocardial infarction: incidence and clinical significance. Chest (2004) 125:1877–1884.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
  11. McCrohon JA, Moon JC, Prasad SK, McKenna WJ, Lorenz CH, Coats AJ, Pennell DJ. Differentiation of heart failure related to dilated cardiomyopathy and coronary artery disease using gadolinium-enhanced cardiovascular magnetic resonance. Circulation (2003) 108:54–59.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  12. Dokainish H, Pillai M, Murphy SA, DiBattiste PM, Schweiger MJ, Lotfi A, Morrow DA, Cannon CP, Braunwald E, Lakkis N, TACTICS-TIMI-18 Investigators. Prognostic implications of elevated troponin in patients with suspected acute coronary syndrome but no critical epicardial coronary disease: a TACTICS-TIMI-18 substudy. J Am Coll Cardiol (2005) 45:19–24.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  13. Jeremias A, Gibson CM. Narrative review: alternative causes for elevated cardiac troponin levels when acute coronary syndromes are excluded. Ann Intern Med (2005) 142:786–791.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  14. Abdel-Aty H, Zagrosek A, Schulz-Menger J, Taylor AJ, Messroghli D, Kumar A, Gross M, Dietz R, Friedrich MG. Delayed enhancement and T2-weighted cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging differentiate acute from chronic myocardial infarction. Circulation (2004) 109:2411–2416.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  15. Mahrholdt H, Wagner A, Deluigi CC, Kispert E, Hager S, Meinhardt G, Vogelsberg H, Fritz P, Dippon J, Bock CT, Klingel K, Kandolf R, Sechtem U. Presentation, patterns of myocardial damage, and clinical course of viral myocarditis. Circulation (2006) 114:1581–1590.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  16. De Cobelli F, Pieroni M, Esposito A, Chimenti C, Belloni E, Mellone R, Canu T, Perseghin G, Gaudio C, Maseri A, Frustaci A, Del Maschio A. Delayed gadolinium-enhanced cardiac magnetic resonance in patients with chronic myocarditis presenting with heart failure or recurrent arrhythmias. J Am Coll Cardiol (2006) 47:1649–1654.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  17. Mahrholdt H, Goedecke C, Wagner A, Meinhardt G, Athanasiadis A, Vogelsberg H, Fritz P, Klingel K, Kandolf R, Sechtem U. Cardiovascular magnetic resonance assessment of human myocarditis: a comparison to histology and molecular pathology. Circulation (2004) 109:1250–1258.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  18. Kim RJ, Fieno DS, Parrish TB, Harris K, Chen EL, Simonetti O, Bundy J, Finn JP, Klocke FJ, Judd RM. Relationship of MRI delayed contrast enhancement to irreversible injury, infarct age, and contractile function. Circulation (1999) 100:1992–2002.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  19. Bellenger NG, Pennell DJ. Ventricular function. In: Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance—Manning WJ, Pennell DJ, eds. (2002) New York: Churchill Livingstone. 99–111.
  20. Grothues F, Smith GC, Moon JC, Bellenger NG, Collins P, Klein HU, Pennell DJ. Comparison of interstudy reproducibility of cardiovascular magnetic resonance with two-dimensional echocardiography in normal subjects and in patients with heart failure or left ventricular hypertrophy. Am J Cardiol (2002) 90:29–34.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
  21. Grothues F, Moon JC, Bellenger NG, Smith GS, Klein HU, Pennell DJ. Interstudy reproducibility of right ventricular volumes, function and mass with cardiovascular magnetic resonance. Am Heart J (2004) 147:218–223.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
  22. Maceira AM, Prasad SK, Khan M, Pennell DJ. Normalized left ventricular systolic and diastolic function by steady state free precession cardiovascular magnetic resonance. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson (2006) 8:417–426.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
  23. Abdel-Aty H, Boye P, Zagrosek A, Wassmuth R, Kumar A, Messroghli D, Bock P, Dietz R, Friedrich MG, Schulz-Menger J. Diagnostic performance of cardiovascular magnetic resonance in patients with suspected acute myocarditis: comparison of different approaches. J Am Coll Cardiol (2005) 45:1815–1822.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  24. Prineas RJ, Crow RS, Blackburn H. The Minnesota Code Manual of Electrocardiographic Findings: Standards and Procedures for Measurement and Classification (1982) Boston: John Wright, PSG Inc.
  25. National Kidney Foundation. K/DOQI clinical practice guidelines for chronic kidney disease: evaluation, classification, and stratification. Am J Kidney Dis (2002) 39(2 Suppl. 1):S1–S266.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
  26. Akashi YJ, Musha H, Kida K, Itoh K, Inoue K, Kawasaki K, Hashimoto N, Miyake F. Reversible ventricular dysfunction takotsubo cardiomyopathy. Eur J Heart Fail (2005) 7:1171–1176.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  27. Braunwald E, Antman EM, Beasley JW, Califf RM, Cheitlin MD, Hochman JS, Jones RH, Kereiakes D, Kupersmith J, Levin TN, Pepine CJ, Schaeffer JW, Smith EE 3rd, Steward DE, Theroux P, Gibbons RJ, Alpert JS, Faxon DP, Fuster V, Gregoratos G, Hiratzka LF, Jacobs AK, Smith SC Jr. ACC/AHA 2002 guideline update for the management of patients with unstable angina and non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction—summary article: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association task force on practice guidelines (Committee on the Management of Patients With Unstable Angina). J Am Coll Cardiol (2002) 40:1366–1374.[Free Full Text]
  28. Simonetti OP, Kim RJ, Fieno DS, Hillenbrand HB, Wu E, Bundy JM, Finn JP, Judd RM. An improved MR imaging technique for the visualization of myocardial infarction. Radiology (2001) 218:215–223.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  29. Moon JC, Reed E, Sheppard MN, Elkington AG, Ho SY, Burke M, Petrou M, Pennell DJ. The histologic basis of late gadolinium enhancement cardiovascular magnetic resonance in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy. J Am Coll Cardiol (2004) 43:2260–2264.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  30. Wagner A, Mahrholdt H, Holly TA, Elliott MD, Regenfus M, Parker M, Klocke FJ, Bonow RO, Kim RJ, Judd RM. Contrast-enhanced MRI and routine single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) perfusion imaging for detection of subendocardial myocardial infarcts: an imaging study. Lancet (2003) 361:374–379.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
  31. Aletras AH, Tilak GS, Natanzon A, Hsu LY, Gonzalez FM, Hoyt RF Jr, Arai AE. Retrospective Determination of the Area at Risk for Reperfused Acute Myocardial Infarction With T2-Weighted Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Imaging: Histopathological and Displacement Encoding With Stimulated Echoes (DENSE) Functional Validations. Circulation (2006) 113:1865–1870.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  32. Vignaux O, Dhote R, Duboc D, Blanche P, Dusser D, Weber S, Legmann P. Clinical significance of myocardial magnetic resonance abnormalities in patients with sarcoidosis: a 1-year follow-up study. Chest (2002) 122:1895–1901.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
  33. Marie PY, Angioi M, Carteaux JP, Escanye JM, Mattei S, Tzvetanov K, Claudon O, Hassan N, Danchin N, Karcher G, Bertrand A, Walker PM, Villemot JP. Detection and prediction of acute heart transplant rejection with the myocardial T2 determination provided by a black-blood magnetic resonance imaging sequence. J Am Coll Cardiol (2001) 37:825–831.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  34. Ingkanisorn WP, Rhoads KL, Aletras AH, Kellman P, Arai AE. Gadolinium delayed enhancement cardiovascular magnetic resonance correlates with clinical measures of myocardial infarction. J Am Coll Cardiol (2004) 43:2253–2259.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  35. Christiansen JP, Edwards C, Sinclair T, Armstrong G, Scott A, Patel H, Hart H. Detection of myocardial scar by contrast-enhanced cardiac magnetic resonance imaging in patients with troponin-positive chest pain and minimal angiographic coronary artery disease. Am J Cardiol (2006) 97:768–771.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
  36. Friedrich MG, Strohm O, Schulz-Menger J, Marciniak H, Luft FC, Dietz R. Contrast media-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging visualizes myocardial changes in the course of viral myocarditis. Circulation (1998) 97:1802–1809.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  37. Sharkey SW, Lesser JR, Zenovich AG, Maron MS, Lindberg J, Longe TF, Maron BJ. Acute and reversible cardiomyopathy provoked by stress in women from the United States. Circulation (2005) 111:472–479.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  38. Jeremias A, Gibson CM. Narrative review: alternative causes for elevated cardiac troponin levels when acute coronary syndromes are excluded. Ann Intern Med (2005) 142:786–791.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  39. Deckers JW, Hare JM, Baughman KL. Complications of transvenous right ventricular endomyocardial biopsy in adult patients with cardiomyopathy: a seven-year survey of 546 consecutive diagnostic procedures in a tertiary referral center. J Am Coll Cardiol (1992) 19:43–47.[Abstract]
  40. Chow LH, Radio SJ, Sears TD, McManus BM. Insensitivity of right ventricular endomyocardial biopsy in the diagnosis of myocarditis. J Am Coll Cardiol (1989) 14:915–920.[Abstract]

Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
CirculationHome page
D. J. Pennell
Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance
Circulation, February 9, 2010; 121(5): 692 - 705.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Coll CardiolHome page
H. W. Kim, A. Farzaneh-Far, and R. J. Kim
Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance in Patients With Myocardial Infarction: Current and Emerging Applications
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., January 5, 2010; 55(1): 1 - 16.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Coll CardiolHome page
C. A. Miller, R. O'Hanlon, and S. K. Prasad
Diagnosis of Acute Myocarditis by Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance in a Patient With Chest Pain, Positive Troponin, and Normal Coronary Arteries
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., January 5, 2010; 55(1): 74 - 74.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur Heart JHome page
H. Baccouche, H. Mahrholdt, G. Meinhardt, R. Merher, M. Voehringer, S. Hill, K. Klingel, R. Kandolf, U. Sechtem, and A. Yilmaz
Diagnostic synergy of non-invasive cardiovascular magnetic resonance and invasive endomyocardial biopsy in troponin-positive patients without coronary artery disease
Eur. Heart J., December 1, 2009; 30(23): 2869 - 2879.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
HeartHome page
N C Edwards, H Routledge, and R P Steeds
T2-weighted magnetic resonance imaging to assess myocardial oedema in ischaemic heart disease
Heart, August 15, 2009; 95(16): 1357 - 1361.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Circ Cardiovasc ImagingHome page
U. Hoffmann and F. Bamberg
Is Computed Tomography Coronary Angiography the Most Accurate and Effective Noninvasive Imaging Tool to Evaluate Patients With Acute Chest Pain in the Emergency Department?: CT Coronary Angiography Is the Most Accurate and Effective Noninvasive Imaging Tool for Evaluating Patients Presenting With Chest Pain to the Emergency Department
Circ Cardiovasc Imaging, May 1, 2009; 2(3): 251 - 263.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Coll CardiolHome page
M. G. Friedrich, U. Sechtem, J. Schulz-Menger, G. Holmvang, P. Alakija, L. T. Cooper, J. A. White, H. Abdel-Aty, M. Gutberlet, S. Prasad, et al.
Cardiovascular magnetic resonance in myocarditis: A JACC White Paper.
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., April 28, 2009; 53(17): 1475 - 1487.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
T. Lockie, E. Nagel, S. Redwood, and S. Plein
Use of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Acute Coronary Syndromes
Circulation, March 31, 2009; 119(12): 1671 - 1681.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Coll Cardiol ImgHome page
A. Zagrosek, H. Abdel-Aty, P. Boye, R. Wassmuth, D. Messroghli, W. Utz, A. Rudolph, S. Bohl, R. Dietz, and J. Schulz-Menger
Cardiac magnetic resonance monitors reversible and irreversible myocardial injury in myocarditis.
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. Img., February 1, 2009; 2(2): 131 - 138.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Coll CardiolHome page
S. Sen-Chowdhry, P. Syrris, S. K. Prasad, S. E. Hughes, R. Merrifield, D. Ward, D. J. Pennell, and W. J. McKenna
Left-dominant arrhythmogenic cardiomyopathy: an under-recognized clinical entity.
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., December 16, 2008; 52(25): 2175 - 2187.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Coll CardiolHome page
M. G. Friedrich
There Is More Than Shape and Function
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., November 4, 2008; 52(19): 1581 - 1583.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur Heart JHome page
I. Eitel, F. Behrendt, K. Schindler, D. Kivelitz, M. Gutberlet, G. Schuler, and H. Thiele
Differential diagnosis of suspected apical ballooning syndrome using contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging
Eur. Heart J., November 1, 2008; 29(21): 2651 - 2659.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Coll Cardiol ImgHome page
M. G. Friedrich
Tissue characterization of acute myocardial infarction and myocarditis by cardiac magnetic resonance.
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. Img., September 1, 2008; 1(5): 652 - 662.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Clin. Chem.Home page
A. S. Jaffe
Key Issues in the Developing Synergism between Cardiovascular Imaging and Biomarkers
Clin. Chem., September 1, 2008; 54(9): 1432 - 1442.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
LupusHome page
H Abdel-Aty, N Siegle, A Natusch, E Gromnica-Ihle, R Wassmuth, R Dietz, and J Schulz-Menger
Myocardial tissue characterization in systemic lupus erythematosus: value of a comprehensive cardiovascular magnetic resonance approach
Lupus, June 1, 2008; 17(6): 561 - 567.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Eur Heart JHome page
M. Coceani and A. L'Abbate
Role of delayed enhancement MRI in patients with acute coronary syndrome and unobstructed coronary arteries
Eur. Heart J., October 1, 2007; 28(19): 2416 - 2417.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur Heart JHome page
A. E. Arai
False positive or true positive troponin in patients presenting with chest pain but 'normal' coronary arteries: lessons from cardiac MRI
Eur. Heart J., May 2, 2007; 28(10): 1175 - 1177.
[Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
28/10/1242    most recent
ehm113v1
Right arrow E-letters: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when E-letters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Assomull, R. G.
Right arrow Articles by Prasad, S. K.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Assomull, R. G.
Right arrow Articles by Prasad, S. K.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?