Skip Navigation



European Heart Journal Advance Access published online on March 17, 2008

European Heart Journal, doi:10.1093/eurheartj/ehn103
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
29/13/1688    most recent
ehn103v1
Right arrow E-letters: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when E-letters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Lankhaar, J.-W.
Right arrow Articles by Vonk-Noordegraaf, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Lankhaar, J.-W.
Right arrow Articles by Vonk-Noordegraaf, A.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Published on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology. All rights reserved. © The Author 2008. For permissions please email: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

Pulmonary vascular resistance and compliance stay inversely related during treatment of pulmonary hypertension

Jan-Willem Lankhaar1,2, Nico Westerhof2,3, Theo J.C. Faes1, C. Tji-Joong Gan2, Koen M. Marques4, Anco Boonstra2, Fred G. van den Berg5, Pieter E. Postmus2 and Anton Vonk-Noordegraaf2,*

1 Department of Physics and Medical Technology, Institute for Cardiovascular Research, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
2 Department of Pulmonary Diseases, Institute for Cardiovascular Research, VU University Medical Center, De Boelelaan 1117, 1081 HV, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
3 Department of Physiology, Institute for Cardiovascular Research, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
4 Department of Cardiology, Institute for Cardiovascular Research, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
5 Department of Radiology, Institute for Cardiovascular Research, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands

Received 15 August 2007; revised 9 February 2008; accepted 16 February 2008.

* Corresponding author. Tel: +31 20 44 44 782, Fax: +31 20 44 44 328, Email: a.vonk{at}vumc.nl


    Abstract
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 Conclusion
 Funding
 References
 
Aims: Pulmonary arterial compliance (C) is increasingly being recognized as an important contributor to right ventricular afterload, but for monitoring of treatment of pulmonary hypertension (PH) most often still only pulmonary vascular resistance (R) is used. We aimed at testing the hypothesis that R and C are coupled during treatment of PH and that substantial changes in both R and C would result in more haemodynamic improvement than changes in R alone.

Methods and results: Data were analysed of two right-heart catheterizations of 52 patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension and 10 with chronic-thromboembolic PH. The product of R and C (= stroke volume over pulse pressure) did not change during therapy (P = 0.320), implying an inverse relationship. Changes in cardiac index correlated significantly (P < 0.001) with changes in R (R2 = 0.37), better with changes in C (R2 = 0.66), and best with changes in both (R2 = 0.74).

Conclusion: During therapy for PH, R and C remain inversely related. Therefore, changes in both R and C better explain changes in cardiac index than either of them alone. Not only resistance but also compliance plays a prominent role in PH especially in an early stage of the disease.

Key Words: Pulmonary arterial compliance • Pulmonary vascular resistance • Pulmonary pressure decay time • Right ventricular afterload


    Introduction
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 Conclusion
 Funding
 References
 
Pulmonary hypertension (PH) is characterized by an increased right ventricular (RV) afterload. Although, the RV initially may adapt to this afterload, most patients eventually die from heart failure. Since new therapies aimed at reducing RV afterload have been introduced in the last decade, it is important to gain insight in the factors that contribute to RV afterload and how they are affected by therapy.

In clinical practice, changes in RV afterload after therapy are most often described as changes in pulmonary vascular resistance. For example, in clinical trials on new therapies, pulmonary vascular resistance is often used as a secondary1,2 or even primary3 endpoint. However, while resistance relates to steady load (ratio of mean pressure and mean flow), flow is obviously pulsatile. Since arterial compliance relates to oscillatory load, compliance may be a haemodynamic parameter of equal importance as resistance. However, to our knowledge the long-term effects of therapy on compliance in PH have not been studied yet. Mahapatra et al.4 showed that compliance is a strong predictor of mortality, but they did not study the changes in compliance after therapy. Weinberg et al.5 studied changes in compliance, but they studied acute effects only.

The product of resistance (R) and compliance (C) is called the RC-time because it has the unit of time. It characterizes the decay of pulmonary artery pressure in diastole.6 In a previous study, we have shown that the RC-time is the same in patients with and without PH,7 implying that R and C are inversely related: patients with a large R have a small C and patients with a small R have a large C. We hypothesized that the RC-time remains the same during therapy for PH. As shown in Figure 1, patients with severe PH (high R at baseline) will then require a much larger decrease in R than patients with mild PH (low R at baseline) in order to obtain the same increase in C. Therefore, it may be expected that patients show more haemodynamic improvement when their decrease in R is accompanied by an increase in C than when R decreases alone. In this study, we determined both R and C twice during therapy and related changes in cardiac index with changes in R and C.


Figure 1
View larger version (13K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PowerPoint slide]
 
Figure 1 The consequence of a constant RC-time {tau} during therapy for patients A and B. At baseline, patient A has a low resistance R (mild PH) and patient B a high resistance (severe PH). If the RC-time is constant, patients will always move along the dashed line and a change in resistance {Delta}R will be accompanied by a change in compliance {Delta}C. If the resistance R of both patients decreases with the same amount {Delta}R, patient A will improve much more in compliance than patient B. Thus, patient A will improve substantially in both steady and pulsatile afterload, while patient B will improve in steady afterload only

 

    Methods
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 Conclusion
 Funding
 References
 
Patients and measurements
We included all consecutive patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) or inoperable chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (CTEPH) who had undergone two right-heart catheterizations between October 2003 and June 2006 and who were treated for PH. The distribution of diagnoses is shown in Table 1. The CTEPH patients had a history of pulmonary embolism and an abnormal pulmonary angiogram. Their operability was evaluated according to the recommended criteria.810 All patients suspected of PH were evaluated according to a standard diagnostic protocol.11 PAH is confirmed if a mean pulmonary artery pressure >25 mmHg and a pulmonary capillary wedge pressure <15 mmHg at rest is found. On a regular basis or if the clinical occasion calls for it, patients undergo a follow-up right-heart catheterization for assessment of treatment effectiveness. The first of the two catheterizations could either be a baseline (before disease-specific treatment) or a follow-up catheterization.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Table 1 Distribution of the diagnoses across the study population

 
To prevent selection bias for a specific treatment, we included patients on a wide variety of regimens (Table 2). In addition, many patients went through one or more regimen changes between the two catheterizations. The institutional ethics committee approved the study and all patients gave informed consent.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Table 2 Number of patients in each treatment regimen

 
Pressure was measured during right-heart catheterization (PAH) or during pulmonary angiography (CTEPH). Cardiac output was measured using the Fick principle or thermodilution. If possible, pulmonary capillary wedge pressure (or left-ventricular end-diastolic pressure) was measured. If wedge pressure could only be measured during one of the two catheterizations or during a third catheterization not longer than 1 year ago, wedge pressure was assumed equal to the latter. If a reliable wedge pressure was not available, a value of 10 mmHg was assumed. In 19 patients, pressure and ECG were digitally recorded using a PowerLab data acquisition system (ADInstruments) for comparison of the RC-time estimation methods.

RC-time
R was calculated as the ratio of mean pulmonary artery pressure and mean flow and C as the ratio of stroke volume and pulse pressure. For the RC-time {tau} it then holds that


Formula

with T the heart period, mPAP mean pulmonary artery pressure, PCWP the pulmonary capillary wedge pressure, and PP the pulmonary artery pulse pressure. To test the validity of this formula, {tau} was also estimated from the pulmonary artery pressure in the subset of patients with a digitally recorded pressure. A mono-exponential function was fit to the diastolic pulmonary artery pressure of an ensemble-averaged cardiac cycle.6,7 The function was fit by linear regression of the logarithm of the diastolic pressure (from 50 ms after the start of diastole to 50 ms before the end; asymptotic pressure equal to PCWP). These analyses were done with MATLAB 7.0, R14 (The MathWorks, Natick, MA, USA).

Statistical methods
Values of catheterization 1 and 2 were compared with a paired Student’s t-test (two-tailed). Delta’s ({Delta}) were calculated as the value at catheterization 2 minus the value at catheterization 1 and average absolute changes as the average of the absolute value of the delta’s. Different regression models were used to explain the changes in cardiac index ({Delta}CI). First, {Delta}R and {Delta}C were used separately as univariate predictors. Subsequently, the model with {Delta}R as predictor was stepwise extended with {Delta}C and {Delta}R·{Delta}C (interaction term) as predictors. These models were compared using the F test and the standardized regression coefficients. Besides {Delta}R and {Delta}C, the length of the arrow (vector) {lambda} that connects the first and second RC-pair of a patient (Figure 1)


Formula 103UM2

was used as a predictor. In case of improvement in R during therapy ({Delta}R negative), {lambda} was assigned a positive sign and otherwise a negative sign.

Because both the dependent and the independent variables in the regression models are derived from common measurements, regression and correlation may be biased due to mathematical coupling.12 We corrected mathematical coupling with the method of Stratton et al.12 for univariate regression and the SIMEX method13 for multivariate regression. Differences with P < 0.05 were regarded as statistically significant (two-tailed testing). Values are presented as mean±SD. Statistical analysis was done with SPSS 12.0.1 for Windows (SPSS, Chicago, IL, USA) and correction for mathematical coupling with MATLAB.


    Results
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 Conclusion
 Funding
 References
 
Patient characteristics
Our study population consisted of 17 men and 45 women, aged 47.8 ± 15.1 years at catheterization 1 (range 21.2–78.6 years). Fifty-two patients were diagnosed with PAH and 10 patients with inoperable CTEPH. The time between the two catheterizations was 1.1 ± 0.4 years (range 50–748 days). Table 3 summarizes the haemodynamic data. Most of the haemodynamic variables changed significantly during the period between the catheterizations (P < 0.01). On average, we did not find a change in right atrial pressure and heart rate. The average absolute change was 3.1 ± 2.5 mmHg in right atrial pressure and 9.8 ± 8.8 b.p.m. in heart rate.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Table 3 Average haemodynamic data

 
RC-time
Bland–Altman analysis of the two estimation methods for {tau} revealed an average difference of –0.05 ± 0.10 s, indicating that the simple formula underestimates {tau} with respect to the average of the simple formula and {tau} estimated with the exponential fit (Figure 2). Since, the former is the product of two validated estimation methods (R, the ratio of pressure and flow, and C, the ratio of stroke volume and pulse pressure) and since it enables estimation of {tau} in a larger cohort of patients, we judged the agreement acceptable.


Figure 2
View larger version (17K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PowerPoint slide]
 
Figure 2 Bland–Altman analysis of the agreement between {tau} estimated from the simple formula and from the exponential fit. The dashed lines denote the limits of agreement and the dotted lines the corresponding 95% confidence intervals

 
On average, the RC-time did not change significantly during the period between the two catheterizations: {tau}1 = 0.61 ± 0.15 s and {tau}2 = 0.59 ± 0.16 s. Although many patients showed a change in {tau} (average absolute change 0.11 ± 0.09 s or 19 ± 16%, Figure 3), the average difference was not statistically significant (paired Student’s t-test: P = 0.320; 95% confidence interval of differences: –0.017 to 0.053 s).


Figure 3
View larger version (33K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PowerPoint slide]
 
Figure 3 The RC-time {tau} measured during the catheterizations 1 and 2. Squares with errorbar denote mean±SD

 
We investigated whether the heterogeneity of the population concealed possible different behaviour of subgroups. Subgroups were defined on the basis of moment of catheterization 1 (either before or during disease-specific treatment) and diagnosis (idiopathic PAH or CTEPH). In none of the subgroups, a significant change in {tau} was found (Table 4).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Table 4 RC-time {tau} at catheterizations 1 and 2 in different subgroups

 
Figure 4 (left panel) relates C and R at the time of catheterizations 1 and 2. An arrow connects data of individual patients. Apparently, during the course of the disease, patients follow the hyperbola that results from a constant RC-time (Figure 1). This is further illustrated in Figure 4 (right panel) where the changes in R and C are plotted as vectors from the origin. The majority of the vectors end in the top-left or bottom-right quadrants indicating that if R decreases, C increases and vice versa. These vectors correspond with a movement tangential to the hyperbola of the left panel, whereas vectors in the top-right and bottom-left quadrants correspond to a (somewhat paradoxical) perpendicular movement. We conclude that for the population as a whole, the RC-time does not change between the two catheterizations.


Figure 4
View larger version (18K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PowerPoint slide]
 
Figure 4 Left: compliance C vs. resistance R at catheterizations 1 and 2. The circles denote catheterization 1 and the arrows point to catheterization 2. The grey line is the hyperbola C={tau}/R. Note that most arrows start and end in the vicinity of the curve. Right: {Delta}R and {Delta}C represented as a vector from the origin, indicating the change in both R and C between catheterizations 1 and 2

 
Haemodynamic changes
Linear regression with changes in cardiac index {Delta}CI as dependent variable and changes in load in terms of {Delta}R, {Delta}C, and {lambda} yielded the results shown in Table 5 and Figure 5. The regression coefficients are corrected for mathematical coupling. Correction did not significantly affect the regression slope nor did it decrease the correlation coefficients. Since correlation coefficients can be problematic (e.g. >1) after correction for mathematical coupling,12 we report the R2 before correction. Changes in CI are much better explained by {Delta}C (R2 = 0.67), and even better by {Delta}R and {Delta}C combined or by {lambda} (R2 = 0.74 and 0.70, respectively) than by {Delta}R alone (R2 = 0.37, Figure 5).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Table 5 Results of linear regression with the change in cardiac index ({Delta}CI) as the dependent variable (n = 60)

 

Figure 5
View larger version (21K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PowerPoint slide]
 
Figure 5 Linear regression with {Delta}CI as dependent variable and change in resistance {Delta}R, change in compliance {Delta}C and vector length {lambda}. {lambda}, a combined measure of {Delta}R and {Delta}C, best explains changes in CI

 

    Discussion
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 Conclusion
 Funding
 References
 
No change in RC-time
We found that the RC-time, the product of pulmonary vascular resistance R, and pulmonary arterial compliance C, does not change significantly in patients treated for PH. This implies that R and C are inversely related, which agrees with our hypothesis (Figure 1). This is best illustrated in a plot of C vs. R, where most of the data are in close vicinity of the hyperbola (Figure 4, left panel).

We deliberately introduced heterogeneity in the study in four ways. First, patients with many forms of PH were included. Our study covered both the categories (categories 1 and 4) of the WHO classification of PH10 that are currently targets of PH-specific treatment. Second, a wide variety of treatment regimens (Table 2) was included and many patients went through a regimen change during the study period. Thus, we prevented bias for a specific therapy. Third, the time between the two catheterizations was not fixed, resulting in a variety of periods (range 50–748 days). Thus, we also prevented bias for a specific duration. Fourth, patients were included with either the first of the two catheterizations at baseline (before disease-specific treatment) or at follow-up. Since we did not find significant changes in this heterogeneous group of patients nor in more homogeneous subgroups, we conclude that the inverse coupling of R and C is a basic phenomenon. Our finding of a nearly constant RC-time during therapy is in line with what we and others have found for patients at baseline.7,14,15

We used the length of the vector (with a sign) that connects the data of the first and the second catheterization (with a positive sign corresponding to a decrease in R) to relate changes in the ‘RC-plane’ with cardiac index. This vector length {lambda} accounts for changes in both resistance and compliance, and thus comprehensively summarizes a patient’s improvement or decline in both steady and pulsatile afterload. For a patient with severe PH in whom R decreases much but C changes little, and for a patient with mild PH in whom R decreases little but C increases more, a similar value for {lambda} may be found. Since its ability to predict changes in CI is about the same as that of the multiple regression model of {Delta}R and {Delta}C, {lambda} may be an important clinical parameter.

Haemodynamic consequences
The inverse coupling of R and C has direct and important haemodynamic consequences. In mild PH, the decrease in R is accompanied by a substantial increase in C, while in severe PH, the increase in C is negligible (Figure 1). This may explain the clinical observation that patients with mild PH (moderately increased R) often show a greater haemodynamic improvement after therapy than patients with severe PH (strongly increased R), even if their R decreases by the same amount.16

If R and C are inversely related, the contribution of C to RV afterload is as important as the contribution of R. This is confirmed by the strong correlations of {Delta}CI with {Delta}C alone (R2 = 0.67) and with {Delta}R and {Delta}C combined (R2 = 0.74, Figure 5). The strong correlations cannot be explained by mathematical coupling due to the common measurements on which the dependent and independent variable are based. At first sight, it may be surprising that {Delta}C even better predicts changes in CI than {Delta}R. However, under the assumption of a constant RC-time {tau}, it can be shown that {Delta}C can be expressed in terms of R and {Delta}R


Formula 103UM3

If {Delta}C is predicted with this formula (thus using R and {Delta}R only), the same correlation with {Delta}CI is found as in case of the measured {Delta}C (Figure 6).


Figure 6
View larger version (21K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PowerPoint slide]
 
Figure 6 Linear regression of {Delta}CI with {Delta}C predicted from {Delta}R under the assumption that RC-time {tau} is constant. Note the similarity in slope, intercept, and goodness-of-fit (R2) with the middle panel of Figure 5

 
CI is one of the few haemodynamic parameters with significant prognostic value17 and also one of the few that correlate with functional measures.18 Although {lambda} correlates strongly with changes in CI, it should be appreciated that both reflect different things. CI is the result of the complex interaction of heart and arterial system. Thus, CI is determined by both the characteristics of the vascular bed and the heart. If the heart starts failing, the state of the vascular bed may be unaltered but CI will decrease. If, on the other hand, the arterial system changes due to progression of the disease, the state of the heart may be unaltered but CI will again decrease. In contrast, {lambda} only reflects changes in the vascular bed. Therefore, its clinical relevance resides in its specificity for the vascular bed and its apparent ability to describe changes in RV afterload better than changes in either R or C. It should be noted that as a consequence {lambda} not necessarily reflects changes in the functional status of the patient, since these are the result of an even far more complex interaction.

Clinical importance of compliance
Since pulmonary vascular resistance is mainly determined by the small peripheral arteries and arterioles and PH most often is caused by small vessel disease, most of the attention has been paid to the study of the role of small vessels in PH. Pulmonary arterial compliance, on the other hand, is generally believed to be determined by the large vessels and has, consequently, been studied to a much lesser extent. However, most PH-patients die from RV failure and, as our study shows, compliance strongly contributes to RV afterload. Therefore, our present study suggests that in clinical studies more attention should be paid to changes in arterial compliance.

In the research on ventricular afterload, the contribution of arterial compliance has been gaining importance, especially in the study of systemic hypertension.19 Recent studies indicate that compliance may be of similar importance in PH. Muthurangu et al.15 assessed pulmonary arterial compliance in 17 patients suspected of PH or congenital heart disease using MR-guided cardiac catheterization. Mahapatra et al.,4 in a study with 104 PH-patients, have shown that invasively assessed arterial compliance is a strong predictor of survival. Furthermore, Jardim et al.20 have shown that non-invasively assessed pulmonary artery distensibility is significantly higher in PAH patients responding to an acute vasodilator and Gan et al.21 have shown that pulmonary artery stiffness is also a strong predictor of survival.

Our present study is to our knowledge not only the first to report on the long-term effects of disease-specific therapy on pulmonary arterial compliance in PH, but also the first to provide a clue as to why pulmonary arterial compliance is a strong predictor of survival. This is best illustrated in the plot of C vs. R (Figures 1 and 4). With R and C remaining inversely related during development of the disease, a patient who is developing PH will start in the upper left region of the curve and will move from left to right along the curve (instead of, as is shown, from right to left). Then, a small increase in resistance will be accompanied by a substantial decrease in compliance. Thus, an inverse relationship implies that loss of pulmonary arterial compliance is an early sign of PH. This may explain why compliance is a strong predictor of survival. Furthermore, because measures of pulmonary arterial compliance can be assessed non-invasively, this provides a new perspective on screening of patients suspected of PH.

Limitations
In a number of patients, wedge pressure data were incomplete. In some patients, it was measured during an earlier catheterization and included in the study, in some it could not be measured reliably, and in a few patients referred to our hospital for treatment right-heart catheterization data were incomplete. In the CTEPH-patients, pressure was measured during angiography with a catheter other than a balloon-tipped catheter. In all patients, but especially in the patients without a reliable or even absent wedge pressure measurement, left-sided heart disease was excluded by means of an extensive echo and MRI protocol. In case of incomplete data, we assumed that the wedge pressure remains constant in time or we assumed a reference value. In either case, this is a safer assumption (in terms of accuracy of R) than assuming a wedge pressure of zero. This allowed inclusion of the wedge pressure in the analyses, but we also carried out our analyses by leaving out wedge pressures. Although the numerical values changed, the statistical results were similar (same correlations and levels of significance). Therefore, we assume that the inaccuracies in the wedge pressure play a minor role in the study.

C, estimated as the ratio of stroke volume and pulse pressure, is regarded a rather crude estimate of arterial compliance.6,22 However, we7 and Segers et al.23 have shown that it, despite overestimating compliance, correlates well with other compliance estimation methods. The ratio of stroke volume and pulse pressure is attractive for clinical application because it can be calculated from standard clinical measurements.

The two estimation methods for {tau} agreed only moderately (limits of agreement –0.25 and 0.15 s). Theoretically, the exponential fit would be the preferred method, but it is not very accurate in practice, mainly due to its dependence on the part of diastolic pressure curve that is chosen for the fit. Although we optimized circumstances by automating the procedures as much as possible, the fit was not optimal in all cases. Therefore, it may be questioned which of the two methods is most inaccurate. The simple estimator is the product of two well-validated parameters and might even be the most accurate of the two.

In the definition of {lambda}, the terms under the square root sign are quantities of different physical dimensions. If one of the terms is thought to contain a weight factor with value equal to 1 and the correct dimension, this problem is resolved. It must, however, be noted that this factor should have a different value when R and C are expressed in other units. Therefore, it may be better to standardize R and C by a (reference) population mean and standard deviation. The fit of CI vs. this standardized {lambda} would decrease slightly (R2 = 0.67).


    Conclusion
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 Conclusion
 Funding
 References
 
In conclusion, this study shows that pulmonary vascular resistance and compliance remain inversely related during therapy for PH. As a consequence, cardiac index improves more when a resistance decrease is accompanied by a compliance increase (as in mild PH) than when resistance alone decreases (as in severe PH). Furthermore, an inverse relation implies that early in the disease a compliance decrease is larger and more easily observed than a resistance increase.

Conflict of interest: J.W.L., N.W., T.J.C.F., C.T.J.G., K.M.M., F.G.v.d.B.: none declared. A.B.: lectures for Actelion (2005 and 2006, {euro} 500 per year) and Encysive (2006, {euro} 700), advisory boards of GlaxoSmithKline (2006, {euro} 1200) and Pfizer (2005, {euro} 700), unrestricted educational grant from GlaxoSmithKline ({euro} 25.000). A.V.N.: lecture for Actelion (2003, {euro} 1000).


    Funding
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 Conclusion
 Funding
 References
 
Netherlands Heart Foundation (NHS2003B274 to J.W.L.); Netherlands Organization for Scientific Research (Mozaïek 017.001.154 to C.T.G.).


    References
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 Conclusion
 Funding
 References
 

  1. Barst RJ, Langleben D, Frost A, Horn EM, Oudiz R, Shapiro S, McLaughlin V, Hill N, Tapson VF, Robbins IM, Zwicke D, Duncan B, Dixon RA, Frumkin LR. Sitaxsentan therapy for pulmonary arterial hypertension. Am J Respir Crit Care Med (2004) 169:441–447.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  2. Channick RN, Simonneau G, Sitbon O, Robbins IM, Frost A, Tapson VF, Badesch DB, Roux S, Rainisio M, Bodin F, Rubin LJ. Effects of the dual endothelin-receptor antagonist bosentan in patients with pulmonary hypertension: a randomised placebo-controlled study. Lancet (2001) 358:1119–1123.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
  3. Voswinckel R, Enke B, Reichenberger F, Kohstall M, Kreckel A, Krick S, Gall H, Gessler T, Schmehl T, Ghofrani HA, Schermuly RT, Grimminger F, Rubin LJ, Seeger W, Olschewski H. Favorable effects of inhaled treprostinil in severe pulmonary hypertension: results from randomized controlled pilot studies. J Am Coll Cardiol (2006) 48:1672–1681.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  4. Mahapatra S, Nishimura RA, Sorajja P, Cha S, McGoon MD. Relationship of pulmonary arterial capacitance and mortality in idiopathic pulmonary arterial hypertension. J Am Coll Cardiol (2006) 47:799–803.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  5. Weinberg CE, Hertzberg JR, Ivy DD, Kirby KS, Chan KC, Valdes-Cruz L, Shandas R. Extraction of pulmonary vascular compliance, pulmonary vascular resistance, and right ventricular work from single-pressure and Doppler flow measurements in children with pulmonary hypertension: a new method for evaluating reactivity: in vitro and clinical studies. Circulation (2004) 110:2609–2617.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  6. Westerhof N, Stergiopulos N, Noble M. Snapshots of Hemodynamics (2005) New York: Springer.
  7. Lankhaar JW, Westerhof N, Faes TJC, Marques KM, Marcus JT, Postmus PE, Vonk-Noordegraaf A. Quantification of right ventricular afterload in patients with and without pulmonary hypertension. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol (2006) 291:H1731–H1737.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  8. Dartevelle P, Fadel E, Mussot S, Chapelier A, Herve P, de Perrot M, Cerrina J, Ladurie FL, Lehouerou D, Humbert M, Sitbon O, Simonneau G. Chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension. Eur Respir J (2004) 23:637–648.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  9. Auger WR, Fedullo PF, Moser KM, Buchbinder M, Peterson KL. Chronic major-vessel thromboembolic pulmonary artery obstruction: appearance at angiography. Radiology (1992) 182:393–398.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  10. Simonneau G, Galie N, Rubin LJ, Langleben D, Seeger W, Domenighetti G, Gibbs S, Lebrec D, Speich R, Beghetti M, Rich S, Fishman A. Clinical classification of pulmonary hypertension. J Am Coll Cardiol (2004) 43(Suppl. 12S):5S–12S.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  11. Barst RJ, McGoon M, Torbicki A, Sitbon O, Krowka MJ, Olschewski H, Gaine S. Diagnosis and differential assessment of pulmonary arterial hypertension. J Am Coll Cardiol (2004) 43(Suppl. 12):S40–S47.[CrossRef]
  12. Stratton HH, Feustel PJ, Newell JC. Regression of calculated variables in the presence of shared measurement error. J Appl Physiol (1987) 62:2083–2093.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  13. Holcomb JP Jr. Regression with covariates and outcome calculated from a common set of variables measured with error: estimation using the SIMEX method. Stat Med (1999) 18:2847–2862.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
  14. Reuben SR. Compliance of the human pulmonary arterial system in disease. Circ Res (1971) 29:40–50.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  15. Muthurangu V, Atkinson D, Sermesant M, Miquel ME, Hegde S, Johnson R, Andriantsimiavona R, Taylor AM, Baker E, Tulloh R, Hill D, Razavi RS. Measurement of total pulmonary arterial compliance using invasive pressure monitoring and MR flow quantification during MR-guided cardiac catheterization. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol (2005) 289:H1301–H1306.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  16. McLaughlin VV, McGoon MD. Pulmonary arterial hypertension. Circulation (2006) 114:1417–1431.[Free Full Text]
  17. D’Alonzo GE, Barst RJ, Ayres SM, Bergofsky EH, Brundage BH, Detre KM, Fishman AP, Goldring RM, Groves BM, Kernis JT. Survival in patients with primary pulmonary hypertension. Results from a national prospective registry. Ann Intern Med (1991) 115:343–349.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  18. Barst RJ, Rubin LJ, Long WA, McGoon MD, Rich S, Badesch DB, Groves BM, Tapson VF, Bourge RC, Brundage BH, Koerner SK, Langleben D, Keller CA, Murali S, Uretsky BF, Clayton LM, Jobsis MM, Blackburn SD, Shortino D, Crow JW, The Primary Pulmonary Hypertension Study Group. A comparison of continuous intravenous epoprostenol (prostacyclin) with conventional therapy for primary pulmonary hypertension. N Engl J Med (1996) 334:296–301.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  19. Safar ME, Levy BI, Struijker-Boudier H. Current perspectives on arterial stiffness and pulse pressure in hypertension and cardiovascular diseases. Circulation (2003) 107:2864.[Free Full Text]
  20. Jardim C, Rochitte CE, Humbert M, Rubenfeld G, Jasinowodolinski D, Carvalho CR, Souza R. Pulmonary artery distensibility in pulmonary arterial hypertension: an MRI pilot study. Eur Respir J (2007) 29:476–481.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  21. Gan CT, Lankhaar JW, Westerhof N, Marcus JT, Becker A, Twisk JWR, Boonstra A, Postmus PE, Vonk-Noordegraaf A. Noninvasively assessed pulmonary artery stiffness predicts mortality in pulmonary arterial hypertension. Chest (2007) 132:1906–1912.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
  22. Nichols WW, O’Rourke MF. McDonald’s Blood Flow in Arteries (2005) 5th ed. London: Hodder Arnold.
  23. Segers P, Brimioulle S, Stergiopulos N, Westerhof N, Naeije R, Maggiorini M, Verdonck P. Pulmonary arterial compliance in dogs and pigs: the three-element windkessel model revisited. Am J Physiol (1999) 277:H725–H731.[Web of Science][Medline]

Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
CirculationHome page
H. C. Champion, E. D. Michelakis, and P. M. Hassoun
Comprehensive Invasive and Noninvasive Approach to the Right Ventricle-Pulmonary Circulation Unit: State of the Art and Clinical and Research Implications
Circulation, September 15, 2009; 120(11): 992 - 1007.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Coll CardiolHome page
V. Melenovsky, H. Al-Hiti, L. Kazdova, A. Jabor, P. Syrovatka, I. Malek, J. Kettner, and J. Kautzner
Transpulmonary B-type natriuretic peptide uptake and cyclic guanosine monophosphate release in heart failure and pulmonary hypertension: the effects of sildenafil.
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., August 11, 2009; 54(7): 595 - 600.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ERRHome page
R. Souza and C. Jardim
Trends in pulmonary arterial hypertension
Eur. Respir. Rev., March 1, 2009; 18(111): 7 - 12.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Coll Cardiol ImgHome page
O. Ben-Yehuda and C. Barnett
Magnetic resonance assessment of pulmonary artery compliance a promising diagnostic and prognostic tool in pulmonary hypertension?
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. Img., March 1, 2009; 2(3): 296 - 298.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ChestHome page
D. Chemla, V. Castelain, S. Provencher, M. Humbert, G. Simonneau, and P. Herve
Evaluation of Various Empirical Formulas for Estimating Mean Pulmonary Artery Pressure by Using Systolic Pulmonary Artery Pressure in Adults
Chest, March 1, 2009; 135(3): 760 - 768.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ChestHome page
S. M. Kawut, N. Al-Naamani, C. Agerstrand, E. Berman Rosenzweig, C. Rowan, R. J. Barst, S. Bergmann, and E. M. Horn
Determinants of Right Ventricular Ejection Fraction in Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension
Chest, March 1, 2009; 135(3): 752 - 759.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Appl. Physiol.Home page
D. Xu, N. B. Olivier, and R. Mukkamala
Continuous cardiac output and left atrial pressure monitoring by long time interval analysis of the pulmonary artery pressure waveform: proof of concept in dogs
J Appl Physiol, February 1, 2009; 106(2): 651 - 661.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ChestHome page
I. R. Henkens, C. T.-J. Gan, S. A. van Wolferen, M. Hew, A. Boonstra, J. W. R. Twisk, O. Kamp, E. E. van der Wall, M. J. Schalij, A. Vonk Noordegraaf, et al.
ECG Monitoring of Treatment Response in Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension Patients
Chest, December 1, 2008; 134(6): 1250 - 1257.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
J. J. Tolle, A. B. Waxman, T. L. Van Horn, P. P. Pappagianopoulos, and D. M. Systrom
Exercise-Induced Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension
Circulation, November 18, 2008; 118(21): 2183 - 2189.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur Heart JHome page
R. Souza
Assessment of compliance in pulmonary arterial hypertension
Eur. Heart J., July 1, 2008; 29(13): 1603 - 1604.
[Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
29/13/1688    most recent
ehn103v1
Right arrow E-letters: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when E-letters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Lankhaar, J.-W.
Right arrow Articles by Vonk-Noordegraaf, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Lankhaar, J.-W.
Right arrow Articles by Vonk-Noordegraaf, A.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?