Copyright © 1999 by the European Society of Cardiology.
Editorial
The ratio of post-valvular aorta to valvular orifice cross-sectional areas: a new haemodynamic index of clinical importance in patients with aortic stenosis?
a University of Saint Etienne, Saint Etienne, France
1999
References
- Isaaz K, Rieu R, Pelissier R. Effects of the shape of pre- and post-stenotic regions on the accuracy of Doppler in measuring pressure gradients across long segment stenosis (Abstr). J Am Coll Cardiol. 1988;11:21A
- Isaaz K, Rieu R, Pélissier R. Doppler derived pressure gradients: effects of energy losses associated with stenosis geometry (Abstr). Eur Heart J. 1991;12:131
- Levine RA, Jimoh A, Cape EG, McMillan S, Yoganathan AP, Weyman A. Pressure recovery distal to a stenosis: potential cause of gradient ‘overestimation’ by Doppler echocardiography. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1989;13:706–713[Abstract]
- Voelker W, Reul H, Stelzer T, Schmidt A, Karsch KR. Pressure recovery in aortic stenosis: an in vitro study in a pulsatile flow model. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1992;20:1585–1593[Abstract]
- Baumgartner H, Schima H, Tulzer G, Kühn P. Effect of stenosis geometry on the Doppler-Catheter gradient relation in vitro: a manifestation of pressure recovery. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1993;21:1018–1025[Abstract]
- Niederberg J, Schima H, Maurer G, Baumgartner H. Importance of pressure recovery for the assessment of aortic stenosis by Doppler ultrasound. Role of the aortic size, aortic valve area, and direction of the stenotic jet in vitro. Circulation. 1996;94:1934–1940
[Abstract/Free Full Text] - Cape EG, Jones M, Yamada I, VanAuker MD, Valdes-Cruz LM. Turbulent/viscous interactions control Doppler/Catheter pressure discrepancies in aortic stenosis. The role of the Reynolds number. Circulation. 1996;94:2975–2981
[Abstract/Free Full Text] - Comolet R, Tome I. Statique et dynamique dez fluides non visqueux. Comolet R. Mécanique expérimentale des fluides. Paris: Masson; 1985. p. 135–172
- Laskey WK, Kussmaul WG. Pressure recovery in aortic valve stenosis. Circulation. 1994;89:116–121
[Abstract/Free Full Text] - Schöbel WA, Voelker W, Haase KK, Karsch K-R. Extent, determinants and clinical importance of pressure recovery in patients with aortic valve stenosis. Eur Heart J. 1999;20:1355–1363
[Abstract/Free Full Text] - Clark C. Turbulent velocity measurements in a model of aortic stenosis. J Biomechanics. 1976;9:677–687[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
- Clark C. The fluid mechanics of aortic stenosis-II. Unsteady flow experiments. J Biomechanics. 1976;9:567[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
- Clark C. Energy losses in flow through stenosed valves. J Biomechanics. 1979;12:737–746[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
- Isaaz K, Bruntz JF. Noninvasive quantitation of turbulence in aortic prosthesis using digitally transferred Doppler velocity data. Circulation. 1992;86:I-258
- Isaaz L, Bruntz JF. Quantitation of blood flow turbulence in patients with aortic stenosis: a noninvasive clinical study. Circulation. 1993;88:I-498
- Roach MR. An experimental study of the production and time course of poststenotic dilatation in the femoral and carotid arteries in adult dogs. Circ Res. 1963;13:537–551
[Abstract/Free Full Text] - Stein PD, Sabbah HN, Pitha JV. Continuing disease process of calcific aortic stenosis: role of microthrombi and turbulent blood flow. Am J Cardiol. 1977;39:159–163[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
CiteULike 
Connotea 
Del.icio.us What's this?
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||