Skip Navigation

European Heart Journal 1999 20(24):1826-1832; doi:10.1053/euhj.1999.1749
Copyright © 1999 by the European Society of Cardiology.
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (11)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Dagres, N.
Right arrow Articles by Borggrefe, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Dagres, N.
Right arrow Articles by Borggrefe, M.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Radiofrequency catheter ablation of accessory pathways. Outcome and use of antiarrhythmic drugs during follow-up

N. Dagresf1, f3, J.R. Claguef2, H. Kottkamp, G. Hindricks, G. Breithardt and M. Borggrefe

The Department of Cardiology and Angiology, Hospital of the Westfälische Wilhelms-University and Institute for Arteriosclerosis Research, Münster, Germany

revised May 28, 1999; accepted June 2, 1999

Abstract

Aims The purpose of this study was to assess the acute and long-term success of accessory pathway ablation in a single large-volume centre, concentrating on long-term recurrences and the clinical use of antiarrhythmic drugs.

Methods and Results A total of 519 consecutive patients (mean age 40±14 years) underwent radiofrequency ablation of manifest or concealed accessory pathways. The patients were seen in the hospital or by the referring physician at 6 and 12 months. Long-term follow-up information was obtained by questionnaire. Pathway conduction was abolished in 476 cases (91·7%). ‘Redo’ procedures, due to recurrence, were performed in 38 patients (7·3%) and were successful in 30 (78·9%). Follow-up data were obtained from 454 patients (87·5%) with a follow-up duration of 22·6±12·4 months. Among the 398 patients with successful ablations who responded to the questionnaire, 340 (85·4%) were asymptomatic with only 10·6% taking antiarrhythmic drugs. An additional 20 patients (5·0%) had symptoms suspicious of recurrence. In total, 66 out of 398 successfully treated patients (16·6%) were taking antiarrhythmic drugs. Twenty-three out of 56 (41·1%) patients with failed ablations were asymptomatic, 12 of whom (21·4% of patients with failed ablations) had not been administered antiarrhythmic drugs. In the total group of 454 patients with ablation attempts and available follow-up data, 99 (21·8%) were still taking antiarrhythmic drugs during follow-up.

Conclusions Patients with successful ablation of accessory pathways show excellent long-term results. However, 17% of successfully treated patients were still taking antiarrhythmic drugs during the period of long-term follow-up. On the other hand, 21% of patients with failed ablations were symptom-free without antiarrhythmic drugs. On an intention-to-treat basis, 22% of the patients with ablation attempts were still taking antiarrhythmic drugs during follow-up.

Key Words: Accessory pathway, radiofrequency current, catheter ablation

f1 Present address: Department of Cardiology, University of Essen, Germany.

f3 Correspondence: Dr Nikolaos Dagres, Abteilung fuer Kardiologie, Medizinische Klinik, Universitaetsklinikum Essen, Hufelandstr. 55, 45122 Essen, Germany. Tel: +49/201/7232339, fax: +49/201/7235951.

f2 Present address: Royal Brompton Hospital, London, U.K.

References

  1. Borggrefe M, Budde T, Podczeck A, Breithardt G. High frequency alternating current ablation of an accessory pathway in humans. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1987;10:576–582[Abstract]
  2. Jackman WM, Wang X, Friday KJ. Catheter ablation of accessory atrioventricular pathways (Wolff–Parkinson–White syndrome) by radiofrequency current. N Engl J Med. 1991;324:1605–1611[Abstract]
  3. Kuck K-H, Schlüter M, Geiger M, Siebels J, Duckeck W. Radiofrequency current catheter ablation of accessory atrioventricular pathways. Lancet. 1991;337:1557–1561[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
  4. Lesh MD, van Hare GF, Schamp DJ. Curative percutaneous catheter ablation using radiofrequency energy for accessory pathways in all locations: Results in 100 consecutive patients. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1992;19:1303–1309[Abstract]
  5. Chen X, Kottkamp H, Hindricks G. Recurrence and late block of accessory pathway conduction following radiofrequency catheter ablation. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 1994;5:650–658[ISI][Medline]
  6. Twidale N, Wang X, Beckman KJ. Factors associated with recurrence of accessory pathway conduction after radiofrequency catheter ablation. PACE. 1991;14:2042–2048
  7. Chen SA, Tsang WP, Hsia CP. Radiofrequency catheter ablation for treatment of Wolff–Parkinson–White-syndrome—short and long-term follow-up. Int J Cardiol. 1992;37:199–207[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
  8. Kay GN, Epstein AE, Dailey SM, Plumb VJ. Role of radiofrequency ablation in the management of supraventricular arrhythmias: experience in 760 consecutive patients. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 1993;4:371–389[ISI][Medline]
  9. Schlüter M, Schlüter CA, Cappato R, Hebe J, Siebels J, Kuck K-H. Anatomical distribution, conduction properties, and mode of recurrence after ablation of multiple compared to single accessory pathways. Z Kardiol. 1997;86:221–230[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
  10. Xie B, Heald SC, Camm AJ, Rowland E, Ward DE. Radiofrequency catheter ablation of accessory atrioventricular pathways: primary failure and recurrence of conduction. Heart. 1997;77:363–368[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  11. Hindricks G. The Multicentre European Radiofrequency Survey (MERFS): Complications of radiofrequency catheter ablation of arrhythmias. Eur Heart J. 1993;14:1644–1653[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  12. Langberg JJ, Calkins H, Kim Y-N. Recurrence of conduction in accessory atrioventricular connections after initially successful radiofrequency catheter ablation. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1992;19:1588–1592[Abstract]
  13. Timmermans C, Smeets JLRM, Rodriguez L-M. Recurrence rate after accessory pathway ablation. Br Heart J. 1994;72:571–574[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  14. Chen X, Borggrefe M, Shenasa M, Haverkamp W, Hindricks G, Breithardt G. Characteristics of local electrogram predicting successful transcatheter radiofrequency ablation of left-sided accessory pathways. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1992;20:656–665[Abstract]
  15. Willems S, Chen X, Kottkamp H. Temperature-controlled radiofrequency catheter ablation of manifest accessory pathways. Eur Heart J. 1996;17:445–452[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  16. Calkins H, Langberg J, Sousa J. Radiofrequency catheter ablation of accessory atrioventricular connections in 250 patients: Abbreviated therapeutic approach to Wolff–Parkinson–White syndrome. Circulation. 1992;85:1337–1346[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  17. Xie B, Heald SC, Bashir Y, Camm AJ, Ward DE. Radiofrequency catheter ablation of septal accessory atrioventricular pathways. Br Heart J. 1994;72:281–284[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  18. Calkins H, Yong P, Miller JM. Catheter ablation of accessory pathways, atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia, and the atrioventricular junction: final results of a prospective, multicenter clinical trial. Circulation. 1999;99:262–270[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  19. Brugada J, García-Bolao I, Figueiredo M, Puigfel M, Matas M, Navarro-López F. Radiofrequency ablation of concealed left free-wall accessory pathways without coronary sinus catheterization: Results in 100 consecutive patients. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 1997;8:249–253[ISI][Medline]
  20. Lesh MD, van Hare GF, Scheinman MM, Ports TA, Epstein LA. Comparison of the retrograde and transseptal methods for ablation of left free wall accessory pathways. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1993;22:542–549[Abstract]
  21. Mann DE, Kelly PA, Adler SW, Fuenzalida CE, Reiter MJ. Palpitations occur frequently following radiofrequency catheter ablation for supraventricular tachycardia, but do not predict pathway recurrence. PACE. 1993;16:1645–1649

Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Card Surg AdultHome page
R. E. Eckart and L. M. Epstein
Interventional Therapy for Atrial and Ventricular Arrhythmias
Card. Surg. Adult, January 1, 2008; 3(2008): 1357 - 1374.
[Full Text]


Home page
EuropaceHome page
N. Dagres, C. Piorkowski, H. Kottkamp, D. Th. Kremastinos, and G. Hindricks
Contemporary catheter ablation of arrhythmias in geriatric patients: patient characteristics, distribution of arrhythmias, and outcome
Europace, July 1, 2007; 9(7): 477 - 480.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
HeartHome page
F G Cosio
Should ablation be the first line treatment for supraventricular arrhythmias?
Heart, January 1, 2005; 91(1): 5 - 6.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Coll CardiolHome page
N. Dagres, J. R. Clague, G. Breithardt, and M. Borggrefe
Significant gender-related differences in radiofrequency catheter ablation therapy
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., September 17, 2003; 42(6): 1103 - 1107.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Card Surg AdultHome page
S. D. Satti and L. M. Epstein
Cardiologic Interventional Therapy for Atrial and Ventricular Arrhythmias
Card. Surg. Adult, January 1, 2003; 2(2003): 1253 - 1270.
[Full Text]


Home page
Eur Heart JHome page
J Schlapfer and M Fromer
Late clinical outcome after successful radiofrequency catheter ablation of accessory pathways
Eur. Heart J., April 1, 2001; 22(7): 605 - 609.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Eur Heart JHome page
N Dagres, J.R Clague, H Lottkamp, G Hindricks, G Breithardt, and M Borggrefe
Impact of radiofrequency catheter ablation of accessory pathways on the frequency of atrial fibrillation during long-term follow-up; High recurrence rate of atrial fibrillation in patients older than 50 years of age
Eur. Heart J., March 1, 2001; 22(5): 423 - 427.
[Abstract] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (11)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Dagres, N.
Right arrow Articles by Borggrefe, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Dagres, N.
Right arrow Articles by Borggrefe, M.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?