Copyright © 2000 by the European Society of Cardiology.
Letters to the Editor
Sress echo training need for a better gold standard: the invasive viewpoint
Department of Cardiology, St George's Hospital and Medical School, London, U.K.
References
- Vogel RA. Assessing stenosis significance by coronary arteriography. Are the best variables good enough. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1988;12:692693[ISI][Medline]
- White CW, Wright CB, Dotty DB. Does visual interpretation of the coronary arteriogram predict the physiologic importance of a coronary stenosis. N Engl J Med. 1984;310:819824[Abstract]
- Arnett EN, Isner JM, Redwood DR. Coronary artery narrowing in coronary heart disease: comparison of cineangiographic and necropsy findings. Ann Intern Med. 1979;91:350356[ISI][Medline]
- Marwick T, DHondt AM, Baudhuin T. Optimal use of dobutamine stress for the detection and evaluation of coronary artery disease: combination with echocardiography or scintigraphy, or both. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1993;22:159167[Abstract]
- Senior R, Khattar R, Lahiri A. Value of dobutamine stress echocardiography for the detection of multivessel coronary artery disease. Am J Cardiol. 1998;81:298301[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
- Senior R, Basu S, Handler C, Raftery EB, Lahiri A. Diagnostic accuracy of stress echocardiography for detection of coronary artery disease in hypertensive patients. Eur Heart J. 1996;17:289295
[Abstract/Free Full Text] - Pijls NH, De Bruyne B, Peels K. Measurement of fractional flow reserve to assess the functional severity of coronary-artery stenosis. N Engl J Med. 1996;334:17031708
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
E. A. Kazerooni Population and Sample Am. J. Roentgenol., November 1, 2001; 177(5): 993 - 999. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
