Skip Navigation

European Heart Journal 2000 21(11):911-918; doi:10.1053/euhj.1999.1941
Copyright © 2000 by the European Society of Cardiology.
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Roeters van Lennep, J.E
Right arrow Articles by van der Wall, E.E
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Roeters van Lennep, J.E
Right arrow Articles by van der Wall, E.E
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Gender differences in diagnosis and treatment of coronary artery disease from 1981 to 1997. No evidence for the Yentl syndrome

J.E Roeters van Lennepa, A.H Zwindermana, H.W.O Roeters van Lennepb, H.E Westerveldc, H.W.M Plokkerd, A.A Voorsd, A.V.G Bruschkea and E.E van der Walla,f1

a Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, The Netherlands
b Oosterschelde Hospital, Goes, The Netherlands
c University Hospital Medical Centre, Utrecht, The Netherlands
d St Antonius Hospital, Nieuwegein, The Netherlands

revised September 6, 1999; accepted September 8, 1999

Abstract

Aims The aim of the present clinical study was to evaluate whether gender-related differences existed as regards the extent and localization of coronary artery lesions in patients with angiographically documented coronary artery disease, and whether these angiographic findings would lead to differences in further management.

Methods and results Over a 16-year period (1981–1997) we evaluated 1894 patients (1526 men, 368 women) with angiographically documented coronary artery disease (luminal stenosis ≥60%). For each patient the coronary angiographic results and subsequent revascularization procedures (percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty or coronary artery bypass graft surgery) were analysed. The study period was divided into the early angioplasty years (1981 to 1989) and the current angioplasty years (1990–1997). No gender differences in extent and localization of coronary angiographic lesions were observed. In men and women the incidence of single-vessel disease was 42% and 40%, two-vessel disease 27% and 27%, three-vessel disease 26% and 24%, and left main disease 5% and 8%, respectively (P=ns). Localization of disease in men and women was 36% and 39% for the left anterior descending coronary artery, 34% and 32% for the right coronary artery, and 27% and 26% for the left circumflex coronary artery, respectively (P=ns). There was a significant shift from multi-vessel disease towards single-vessel disease in both men and women (both P<0·001). As to subsequent management, a significant gender difference in favour of women was observed (P=0·021). Over time, the number of angioplasty procedures increased significantly from 11·6% to 23·2% for men (P<0·001), and for women from 17·6% to 28·0% (P=0·025), whereas the number of coronary artery bypass procedures decreased in men from 34·9% to 29·5% (P=0·024) and in women from 42·6% to 30·6% (P=0·019). Referral to angioplasty (n=535) and coronary artery bypass surgery (n=616) in relation to the extent of the disease did not show any gender bias in favour of men.

Conclusions Our angiographic findings did not show significant gender differences as regards the extent and localization of coronary artery disease in patients with angiographically documented coronary artery disease. More importantly, no substantial evidence could be found for under-referral of women to subsequent therapeutic management. Therefore our study questions the presence of Yentl syndrome in the current era.

Key Words: Angiography, coronary artery disease, men, revascularization, women

f1 Correspondence: Ernst E. van der Wall, MD, Department of Cardiology, C5-P28, Leiden University Medical Center, Albinusdreef 2, 2333 ZA Leiden, The Netherlands.

References

  1. Tobin JN, Wassertheil-Smoller S, Wexler JP. Sex bias in considering coronary bypass surgery. Ann Intern Med. 1987;107:19–25[ISI][Medline]
  2. Khan SS, Nessim S, Gray R, Czer LS, Chaux A, Matloff A. Increased mortality of women in coronary artery bypass surgery: evidence for referral bias. Ann Intern Med. 1990;112:561–567[ISI][Medline]
  3. Ayanian JZ, Epstein AM. Differences in the use of procedures between women and men hospitalized for coronary heart disease. N Engl J Med. 1991;325:221–225[Abstract]
  4. Steingart RM, Packer M, Hamm P. Sex differences in the management of coronary artery disease. Survival and Ventricular Enlargement Investigators. N Engl J Med. 1991;325:226–230[Abstract]
  5. Petticrew M, McKee M, Jones J. Coronary artery surgery: are women discriminated against? BMJ. 1993;306:1164–1166[ISI][Medline]
  6. Shaw LJ, Miller DD, Romeis JC, Kargl D, Younis LT, Chaitman BR. Gender differences in the noninvasive evaluation and management of patients with suspected coronary artery disease. Ann Intern Med. 1994;120:559–566[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  7. Bearden D, Allman R, Mcdonald R, Miller S, Pressel S, Petrovitch H. Age, race, and gender variation in the utilization of coronary artery bypass surgery and angioplasty in SHEP. SHEP Cooperative Research Group. Systolic Hypertension in the Elderly Program. J Am Geriatr Soc. 1994;42:1143–1149[ISI][Medline]
  8. Kostis JB, Wilson AC, O'Dowd K. Sex differences in the management and long-term outcome of acute myocardial infarction. A statewide study. Circulation. 1994;90:1715–1730[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  9. Healy B. The Yentl Syndrome. N Engl J Med. 1991;325:274–276[ISI][Medline]
  10. Leaf DA, Sanmarco ME, Bahl RA. Gender differences in coronary angiographic findings from 1972 through 1981 in Los Angles, California. Angiology. 1990;41:609–615[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  11. Kyriakidis J, Petropoulakis P, Androulakis A. Sex differences in anatomy of coronary artery disease. J Clin Epidemiol. 1995;48:723–730[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
  12. Jong P, Mohammed S, Sternberg L. Sex differences in the features of coronary artery disease of patients undergoing coronary angiography. Can J Cardiol. 1996;12:671–677[ISI][Medline]
  13. Bickell NA, Pieper KS, Lee KL. Referral patterns for coronary artery disease treatment: gender bias or good clinical judgment? Ann Internal Med. 1992;116:791–797[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
  14. Krumholz HM, Douglas PS, Lauer MS, Pasternak RC. Selection of patients for coronary angiography and coronary revascularization early after myocardial infarction: is there evidence for a gender bias? Ann Intern Med. 1992;116:785–790[ISI][Medline]
  15. Bell MR, Berger PB, Holmes DR Jr, Mullany CJ, Bailey KR, Gersh BJ. Referral for coronary artery revascularization procedures after diagnostic coronary angiography: Evidence for gender bias? J Am Coll Cardiol. 1995;25:1650–1655[Abstract]
  16. Cox JL, Petrie JF, Pollak PT, Johnstone DE. Managed delay for coronary artery bypass graft surgery: the experience at one Canadian center. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1996;26:1365–1373
  17. Weintraub WS, Kosinski AS, Wenger NK. Is there a bias against performing coronary revascularization in women? Am J Cardiol. 1996;78:1154–1160[ISI][Medline]
  18. Schweiger MJ, McMahon RP, Terrin ML. Comparisons of patients with less than 60% to more than 60% diameter narrowing of the myocardial infarct-related artery after thrombolysis. Am J Cardiol. 1994;74:105–110[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
  19. Westerveld HT, Roeters van Lennep JE, Roeters van Lennep HWO. Apolipoprotein B and coronary artery disease in women. A cross-sectional study in women undergoing their first coronary angiography. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 1998;18:1101–1107[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  20. Eaker ED, Chesebro JH, Sacks FM, Wenger NK, Whisnant JP, Winston M. Cardiovascular disease in women. American Heart Association Medical/Scientific Statement. Special Report. Circulation. 1993;88:1999–2009[Free Full Text]
  21. Rosamond WD, Chambless LE, Folsom. Trends in the incidence of myocardial infarction and in mortality due to coronary heart disease, 1987 to 1994. N Engl J Med. 1998;339:861–867[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  22. Orth-Gomér K, Horsten M, Wamala SP. Social relations and extent and severity of coronary artery disease. The Stockholm Female Coronary Risk study. Eur Heart J. 1998;19:1648–1656[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  23. Douglas PS. Coronary artery disease in women. Braunwald E. Heart Disease. Textbook of Cardiovascular Medicine. Philadelphia: W. B. Saunders Company; 1997. p. 1704–1714
  24. Jacobs AK, Kelsey SF, Brooks MM. Better outcome for women compared with men undergoing coronary revascularization. A report from the Bypass Angioplasty Revascularization Investigation (BARI). Circulation. 1998;98:1279–1285[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  25. Weinbraub WS, Jones EL, King SB III. Changing use of coronary angioplasty and coronary bypass surgery in the treatment of chronic coronary artery disease. Am J Cardiol. 1990;65:183–188[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
  26. Kuhn FE, Rackley CE. Coronary artery disease in women. Risk factors, evaluation, treatment and prevention. Arch Int Med. 1993;153:2626–2636[Abstract]
  27. Ives DG, Fitzpatrick AL, Bild DE. Surveillance and ascertainment of cardiovascular events: the Cardiovascular Health Study. Ann Epidemiol. 1995;143:269–278
  28. White AD, Folsom AR, Chambless LE. Community surveillance of coronary heart disease in the Atheroslerosis Risk in Communities (ARIC) Study: methods and initial two years' experience. J Clin Epidemiol. 1996;49:223–233[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
  29. Clarke KW, Gray D, Keating NA, Hampton JR. Do women with acute myocardial infarction receive the same treatment as men? BMJ. 1994;309:563–566[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  30. Chaitman BR, Bourassa MG, Davis K. Angiographic prevalence of high-risk coronary artery disease in patient subsets (CASS). Circulation. 1981;64:360–367[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  31. Loop FD, Golding LR, MacMillan JP, Cosgrove DM, Lytle BW, Sheldon WC. Coronary artery surgery in women compared to men: analyses of risk and long-term results. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1983;1:383–390[Abstract]
  32. Fisher LD, Kennedy JW, Davis KB. Association of sex, physical size, and operative mortality after coronary artery bypass in the Coronary Artery Surgery Study (CASS). J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1982;84:334–341[Abstract]
  33. Kelsey SF, James M, Holubkov AL. Results of percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty in women: 1985–1986 National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute's Coronary Angioplasty Registry. Circulation. 1993;87:720–727[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  34. Arnold AM, Mick MJ, Piedmonte MR, Simpfendorfer C. Gender differences for coronary angioplasty. Am J Cardiol. 1994;74:18–21[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
  35. Weintraub WS, Wenger NK, Kosinski AS. Percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty in women compared with men. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1994;24:81–90[Abstract]
  36. Hildon A. Gender bias in cardiology: are women missing out on PTCA. Aust J Adv Nurs. 1994;12:6–11[Medline]
  37. D'Hoore WD, Sicotte C, Tilquin C. Sex bias in the management of coronary artery disease of Quebec. Am J Publ Health. 1994;84:1013–1015[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  38. Bell MR, Grill DE, Garratt KN, Berger PB, Gersh BJ, Holmes DR Jr. Long-term outcome of women compared with men after successful coronary angioplasty. Circulation. 1995;91:2876–2881[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  39. Mark DB, Shaw LK, DeLong ER, Califf RM, Pryor DB. Absence of sex bias in the referral of patients for cardiac catheterization. N Engl J Med. 1994;330:1101–1106[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  40. Sullivan AK, Holdright DR, Wright CA, Sparrow JL, Cunningham D, Fox KM. Chest pain in women: clinical, investigative, and prognostic features. BMJ. 1994;308:883–886[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  41. Kee F, Gaffney B, Currie S, O'Reilly D. Access to coronary catheterisation: fair shares for all? BMJ. 1993;307:1305–1307[ISI][Medline]
  42. Wang XL, Tam C, McCredie RM, Wilcken DEL. Determinants of severity of coronary artery disease in Australian men and women. Circulation. 1994;89:1974–1981[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  43. Wong CC, Froelicher ES, Bacchetti P. In a managed care setting, are there sex differences in the use of coronary angiography after acute myocardial infarction. Am Heart J. 1998;135:435–442[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
  44. Kudenchuck PJ, Maynard C, Martin JS, Wirkus M, Weaver WD. Comparison of presentation, treatment and outcome of acute myocardial infarction in men versus women. (MITI Project Registry). Am J Cardiol. 1996;78:9–14[ISI][Medline]
  45. Romm PA, Green CE, Reagan K, Rackley CE. Relation of serum lipoprotein cholesterol levels to presence and severity of angiographic coronary artery disease. Am J Cardiol. 1991;67:479–483[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
  46. LaRosa JC. Dyslipoproteinemia in women and in the elderly. Med Clin North Am. 1994;78:163–180[ISI][Medline]
  47. Stiel GM, Reblin T, Buhrlen M, Lattermann A, Nienaber CA. Differences in lipoprotein (a) and apolipoprotein (a) levels in men and women with advanced coronary atherosclerosis. Cor Art Dis. 1995;6:347–350
  48. Vaitkus PT. Gender differences in the utilization of cardiac catheterization for the diagnosis of chest pain. Am J Cardiol. 1995;75:79–81[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]

Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 CMAJHome page
L. Pilote, K. Dasgupta, V. Guru, K. H. Humphries, J. McGrath, C. Norris, D. Rabi, J. Tremblay, A. Alamian, T. Barnett, et al.
A comprehensive view of sex-specific issues related to cardiovascular disease
Can. Med. Assoc. J., March 13, 2007; 176(6): S1 - S44.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Eur Heart JHome page
Authors/Task Force Members, K. Fox, M. A. A. Garcia, D. Ardissino, P. Buszman, P. G. Camici, F. Crea, C. Daly, G. De Backer, P. Hjemdahl, et al.
Guidelines on the management of stable angina pectoris: executive summary: The Task Force on the Management of Stable Angina Pectoris of the European Society of Cardiology
Eur. Heart J., June 1, 2006; 27(11): 1341 - 1381.
[Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 CirculationHome page
C. Daly, F. Clemens, J. L. Lopez Sendon, L. Tavazzi, E. Boersma, N. Danchin, F. Delahaye, A. Gitt, D. Julian, D. Mulcahy, et al.
Gender Differences in the Management and Clinical Outcome of Stable Angina
Circulation, January 31, 2006; 113(4): 490 - 498.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 NEJMHome page
V. Vaccarino, S. S. Rathore, N. K. Wenger, P. D. Frederick, J. L. Abramson, H. V. Barron, A. Manhapra, S. Mallik, H. M. Krumholz, and the National Registry of Myocardial Infarction Inv
Sex and Racial Differences in the Management of Acute Myocardial Infarction, 1994 through 2002
N. Engl. J. Med., August 18, 2005; 353(7): 671 - 682.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Eur Heart JHome page
C. A. Daly, F. Clemens, J. L. L. Sendon, L. Tavazzi, E. Boersma, N. Danchin, F. Delahaye, A. Gitt, D. Julian, D. Mulcahy, et al.
The clinical characteristics and investigations planned in patients with stable angina presenting to cardiologists in Europe: from the Euro Heart Survey of Stable Angina
Eur. Heart J., May 2, 2005; 26(10): 996 - 1010.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Eur Heart JHome page
C. A. Daly, F. Clemens, J. L. L. Sendon, L. Tavazzi, E. Boersma, N. Danchin, F. Delahaye, A. Gitt, D. Julian, D. Mulcahy, et al.
The initial management of stable angina in Europe, from the Euro Heart Survey: A description of pharmacological management and revascularization strategies initiated within the first month of presentation to a cardiologist in the Euro Heart Survey of Stable Angina
Eur. Heart J., May 2, 2005; 26(10): 1011 - 1022.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 CirculationHome page
A. J. Lansky, J. S. Hochman, P. A. Ward, G. S. Mintz, R. Fabunmi, P. B. Berger, G. New, C. L. Grines, C. G. Pietras, M. J. Kern, et al.
Percutaneous Coronary Intervention and Adjunctive Pharmacotherapy in Women: A Statement for Healthcare Professionals From the American Heart Association
Circulation, February 22, 2005; 111(7): 940 - 953.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 SEMIN CARDIOTHORAC VASC ANESTHHome page
A. A. Fox and N. A. Nussmeier
Does Gender Influence the Likelihood or Types of Complications Following Cardiac Surgery?
Seminars in Cardiothoracic and Vascular Anesthesia, December 1, 2004; 8(4): 283 - 295.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg.Home page
V. Guru, S. E. Fremes, and J. V. Tu
Time-related mortality for women after coronary artery bypass graft surgery: A population-based study
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., April 1, 2004; 127(4): 1158 - 1165.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 ChestHome page
S. S. Rathore, J. M. Foody, M. J. Radford, and H. M. Krumholz
Sex Differences in Use of Coronary Revascularization in Elderly Patients After Acute Myocardial Infarction: A Tale of Two Therapies
Chest, December 1, 2003; 124(6): 2079 - 2086.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Arch Intern MedHome page
P. D. Stein, R. D. Hull, K. C. Patel, R. E. Olson, W. A. Ghali, A. K. Alshab, and F. A. Meyers
Venous Thromboembolic Disease: Comparison of the Diagnostic Process in Men and Women
Arch Intern Med, July 28, 2003; 163(14): 1689 - 1694.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 J. Epidemiol. Community HealthHome page
M D Aguilar, P Lazaro, K Fitch, and S Luengo
Gender differences in clinical status at time of coronary revascularisation in Spain
J. Epidemiol. Community Health, July 1, 2002; 56(7): 555 - 559.
[Abstract] [Full Text]

Home page
 J Am Coll CardiolHome page
D. A. Alter, C. D. Naylor, P. C. Austin, and J. V. Tu
Biology or bias: practice patterns and long-term outcomes for men and women with acute myocardial infarction
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., June 19, 2002; 39(12): 1909 - 1916.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 ANN INTERN MEDHome page
W. A. Ghali, P. D. Faris, P. D. Galbraith, C. M. Norris, M. J. Curtis, L. D. Saunders, V. Dzavik, L. B. Mitchell, M. L. Knudtson, and for the Alberta Provincial Project for Outcome Ass
Sex Differences in Access to Coronary Revascularization after Cardiac Catheterization: Importance of Detailed Clinical Data
Ann Intern Med, May 21, 2002; 136(10): 723 - 732.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 JAMAHome page
S. S. Rathore, J. Chen, Y. Wang, M. J. Radford, V. Vaccarino, and H. M. Krumholz
Sex Differences in Cardiac Catheterization: The Role of Physician Gender
JAMA, December 12, 2001; 286(22): 2849 - 2856.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Eur Heart JHome page
K. Orth-Gormer
New light on the Yentl syndrome
Eur. Heart J., June 1, 2000; 21(11): 874 - 875.
[PDF]

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Roeters van Lennep, J.E
Right arrow Articles by van der Wall, E.E
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Roeters van Lennep, J.E
Right arrow Articles by van der Wall, E.E
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?