Copyright © 2000 by the European Society of Cardiology.
Letters to the Editor
Provisional vs primary stenting during percutaneous coronary intervention
Cardiology Department, Green Lane Hospital, Auckland, New Zealand
References
- Knight CJ, Curzen NP, Groves PH. Stent implantation reduces restenosis in patients with suboptimal results following coronary angioplasty. Eur Heart J. 1999;20:17831790
[Abstract/Free Full Text] - Rupprecht H-J, Meyer J. A plea for provisional stenting. Eur Heart J. 1999;20:17691770
[Free Full Text] - Weaver WD. Optimal angioplasty versus primary stenting (OPUS Study). J Am Coll Cardiol. 1999;34:1
[Free Full Text] - Rodriguez A, Ayala F, Bernardi V. Optimal coronary balloon angioplasty with provisional stenting versus primary stent (OCBAS). J Am Coll Cardiol. 1998;32:13511357
[Abstract/Free Full Text] - Briguori C, Sheiban I, De Gregorio J. Direct stenting without predilation. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1999;34:19101915
[Abstract/Free Full Text] - Ormiston JA, Webster MWI, Ruygrok PN. The NIR-Future trial. A randomized comparison of stenting with and without predilatation. Circulation. 1999;100:I-789
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||