Copyright © 2000 by the European Society of Cardiology.
Is there a need for routine testing of ICD defibrillation capacity?. Results from more than 1000 studies
Hospital of the Westfälische Wilhelms-University of Münster, Department of Cardiology and Angiology and Institute for Arteriosclerosis Research, Münster, Germany
revised March 12, 1999; accepted April 28, 1999
Abstract
Aims Benefits and complications of postoperative implantable cardioverter-defibrillator tests are controversial matters. This study sought to assess the necessity of defibrillation function tests after implantation.
Methods and Results We retrospectively analysed 1007 implantable cardioverter-defibrillator tests in 587 systems and 556 patients. Nine hundred and thirty implantable cardioverter-defibrillator tests (89·4%) were routinely performed. Seventy-one tests (7%) were performed after a change in the antiarrhythmic drug regimen and six tests (0·60%) because of a suspected dysfunction of the implantable cardioverter-defibrillator. During routine tests, four systems (0·4%) failed to defibrillate the patient. However, in all but one test, abnormalities of the system had been observed before the test. After the addition of antiarrhythmic drugs, two of 71 implantable cardioverter-defibrillator systems (2·8%) failed to defibrillate the patient. One of six systems tested due to a suspected dysfunction failed to defibrillate the patient. During 16 tests (1·6%), complications occurred.
Conclusions Our experience demonstrates that postoperative tests of the defibrillation function of implantable cardioverter-defibrillators rarely reveal dysfunctions. As testing is unpleasant for the patient and not free of complications, tests might be restricted to those patients in whom a dysfunction is suspected and to those patients in whom class I or class III antiarrhythmic drugs have been added to the antiarrhythmic drug regimen.
Key Words: Implantable cardioverter-defibrillator, implantable cardioverter-defibrillator test, antiarrhythmic drug, implantable cardioverter-defibrillator dysfunction, defibrillation
f1 Correspondence: Jürgen Brunn, MD, Universitätsklinik, Medizinische Klinik C, Kardiologie und Angiologie, D-48129 Münster, Germany.
References
- Bakker P, Viens E, de Vries J, Bredee J. Impact of defibrillation threshold testing on cerebral circulation and oxygenation (Abstr). PACE. 1994;17:802
- Benedini G, Marchini A, Curnis A. Implantable defibrillator and thromboembolic event. PACE. 1995;18:199202
- Podczek A, Hief C, Veit F. Komplikationen bei transvenös bzw. transvenös subkutan implantierbaren Defibrillatorsystemen. Z Kardiol. 1994;83:366372[Medline]
- Marchlinski F, Flores B, Miller J, Gottlieb C, Hargrove W. Relation of intraoperative defibrillation threshold to successful postoperative defibrillation with an automatic implantable cardioverter defibrillator. Am J Cardiol. 1988;62:393398[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
- Le Feuvre C, Klein GJ, Sakun V, Sheahan R, Krahn A, Yee R. Is predischarge ICD-defibrillation threshold testing necessary? (Abstr). PACE. 1995;18:827
- Weiss DN, Zilo P, Luceri RM, Platt S, Rosenbaum M. Predischarge arrhythmia induction testing of implantable defibrillators may be unnecessary in selected cases. Am J Cardiol. 1997;80:15621565[Medline]
- Higgins SL, Rich DH, Haygood JR, Barone J, Greer SL, Meyer DB. ICD Restudy: Results and potential benefit from routine predischarge and 2-month evaluation. PACE. 1998;21:410417
- Goldberger J, Inbar S, Burke J. Utility of one month transvenous implantable defibrillator tests [abstract]. PACE. 1996;19:676
- Block M, Breithardt G. Long-term follow-up and clinical results of implantable cardioverter-defibrillators. Zipes DP, Jalife J. Cardiac electrophysiology: From cell to bedside. Philadelphia: W.B. Saunders Company; 1995. p. 14121425
- Dorian P, Newman D. Effect of sotalol on ventricular fibrillation and defibrillation in humans. Am J Cardiol. 1993;72:7279
- Jung W, Manz M, Pfeiffer D, Tebbenjohanns J, Pizulli L, Lüderitz B. Effects of antiarrhythmic drugs on epicardial defibrillation energy requirements and the rate of defibrillator discharges. PACE. 1993;16:198201
- Kopp D, Kall J, Kinder C, Glascock D, Wilber D. Effect of amiodarone and left ventricular mass on defibrillation energy requirements: monophasic vs biphasic shocks (Abstr). PACE. 1995;18:872
- Peters G, Gang E, Okazaki H. Acute effects of intravenous propafenone on the internal ventricular defibrillation threshold in the anesthetized dog. Am Heart J. 1991;122:13551360[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
- Stevens S, Haffajee C, Naccarelli G. Propafenone does not effect defibrillation thresholds in patients with implantable cardioverter defibrillators (Abstr). PACE. 1995;18:835
- Zipes DP, Jackman W, Heger J. Clinical transvenous cardioversion of recurrent lifethreatening tachyarrhythmias: Low energy synchronized cardioversion of ventricular tachycardia and termination of ventricular fibrillation in patients using a catheter electrode. Am Heart J. 1982;103:789794[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
- Schaumann A, von zur Mühlen F, Herse B, Gonska BD, Kreuzer H. Empirical versus tested antitachycardia pacing in implantable cardioverter defibrillators: A prospective study including 200 patients. Circulation. 1998;97:6674
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
D. Bansch, H. Kottkamp, G. Gronefeld, J. Vogt, C. Israel, D. Bocker, G. Hindricks, K.-H. Kuck, and on behalf of the Quick-ICD investigators The quick-implantable-defibrillator trial Europace, December 1, 2007; 9(12): 1144 - 1150. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Buob, S. Siaplaouras, D. Tscholl, H.-J. Schäfers, M. Böhm, and J. Jung Clinical value of routine predischarge testing after ICD-implantation Europace, January 1, 2004; 6(2): 159 - 164. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H.V. Huikuri Routine tests should be challenged in cardiology Eur. Heart J., January 2, 2000; 21(2): 100 - 101. [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||

