Skip Navigation

European Heart Journal 2000 21(6):422-424; doi:10.1053/euhj.1999.1962
Copyright © 2000 by the European Society of Cardiology.
This Article
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow E-letters: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when E-letters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Seabra-Gomes, R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Seabra-Gomes, R.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Editorial

Functional assessment of coronary stenosis: it does make sense, but why don't I do it more often?

R. Seabra-Gomes

Hospital Santa-Cruz, Lisbon, Portugal

References

  1. Piek JJ, Boersma E, di Mario C. Angiographic and Doppler flow-derived parameters for assessment of coronary lesion severity and its relation to the result of exercise electrocardiology. Eur Heart J. 2000;21:466–474[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  2. Kern MJ, de Bruyne B, Pijls NHJ. From research to clinical practice: current role of intracoronary physiologically based decision making in the cardiac catheterization laboratory. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1997;30:613–620[Abstract]
  3. Serruys PW, di Mario C, Piek J. Prognostic value of intracoronary flow velocity and diameter stenosis in assessing the short- and long-term outcomes of coronary balloon angioplasty. The DEBATE Study (Doppler Endpoints Balloon Angioplasty Trial Europe). Circulation. 1997;96:3369–3377[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  4. Serruys PW, de Bruyne B, Sousa E. DEBATE II: Final results of the 6-month follow-up. Eur Heart J. 1999;20:
  5. Lafont AM. The French Optimal Stenting Trial (FROST): A multicenter, prospective randomized study comparing systematic stenting to angiography/coronary flow reserve guided stenting: 6 month clinical and angiographic follow-up. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1999;33:
  6. Di Mario C. Doppler and QCA guided aggressive PTCA has the same target lesion revascularization of stent implantation: 6-month-results of the DESTINI study. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1999;33:
  7. Di Francesco L, Di Mario C, De Gregorio J. Clinical, angiographic and physiologic predictors of major adverse cardiac events (MACE) after stent implantation. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1999;33:
  8. Bech GJW, Pijls NHJ, de Bruyne B. Deferral versus performance of PTCA based on coronary pressure derived fractional flow reserve: the DEFER study. Eur Heart J. 1999;20:

Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?



This Article
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow E-letters: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when E-letters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Seabra-Gomes, R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Seabra-Gomes, R.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?