Skip Navigation

European Heart Journal 2000 21(8):668-678; doi:10.1053/euhj.1999.2100
Copyright © 2000 by the European Society of Cardiology.
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (8)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kerensky, R.A
Right arrow Articles by Nissen, S.E
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Kerensky, R.A
Right arrow Articles by Nissen, S.E
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

American College of Cardiology/ European Society of Cardiology international study of angiographic data compression phase I. The effects of lossy data compression on recognition of diagnostic features in digital coronary angiography

R.A Kerenskya,f1, J.T Cusmab, P Kubilisa, R Simonc, T.M Bashored, J.W Hirshfeld, Jre, D.R Holmes, Jrb, C.J Pepinea and S.E Nissenf

f Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, Ohio
d Duke University, Durham, North Carolina
b Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
a University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida
c University of Kiel, Kiel, Germany
e University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania

revised June 1, 1999; accepted December 1, 1999

Abstract

Objectives This study intended to determine the effect of varying degrees of lossy Joint Photographic Experts Group (JPEG) compression on detection of coronary angiographic features.

Background Compression of digital coronary angiograms facilitates playback of images and decreases cost. There are little data on the effect of compression on the accuracy of coronary angiography.

Methods At six centers, 71 angiographers each reviewed a set of 100 angiographic sequences. The 100 sequences were divided into four, 25-sequence subsets. Each subset of 25 was displayed either as original images or at one of three compression ratios (CRs) (6:1, 10:1 or 16:1). The effect of lossy compression on the sensitivity and specificity for detection of diagnostic features was determined. The effect of compression on subjective measures of image quality graded by the angiographers was also examined.

Results Lossy compression at a ratio of 16:1 decreased the sensitivity for the detection of diagnostic features (76% vs. 80%P=0·004). The largest effect was in the detection of calcification (52% vs. 63% at 16:1 compression vs. original images,P <0·001). Subjective indicators of image quality indicated a reduction in confidence in interpretation at CRs of 10:1 and 16:1.

Conclusions With increased ratios of lossy compression, a degradation of digital coronary angiograms occurs that results in decreased diagnostic accuracy. The sensitivity for detection of common diagnostic features was decreased, and subjective assessment of image quality was impaired. Caution is warranted in the interpretation of coronary angiograms that have been subjected to lossy JPEG compression beyond a ratio of 6:1.

f1 Correspondence: Dr. Richard A. Kerensky, Section of Cardiology, University of Florida, 1600 Archer Road, P.O. Box 100277, Gainesville, FLorida 32610-0277

References

  1. Cusma JT, Fortin DF, Spero LA, Groshong BR, Bashore TM. Which media are most likely to solve the archival problem? Int J Cardiac Imaging. 1994;10:165–175[CrossRef][Medline]
  2. Karson TH, DeFranco A, Evans DJ. Replacement of cinefilm by digital angiography: clinical evaluation of a real-time optical storage system (abstr). J Am Coll Cardiol. 1993;2:56A
  3. Mancini, GBJ, Digital coronary angiography: advantages and limitations, Reiber, JHC, Serruys, PW, Quantitative Coronary Angiography, Dordrecht, Kluwer, 1991, 23, 42
  4. Holmes DR, Wondrow MA, Bell MR, Nissen SE, Cusma JT. Cine film replacement: digital archive requirements and remaining obstacles. Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn. 1998;44:346–356[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
  5. Rabbani M, Jones PW. Image compression techniques for medical diagnostic imaging systems. J Digit Imaging. 1991;4:65–78[Medline]
  6. Bramble JM, Huang HK, Murphy MD. Image data compression. Invest Radiol. 1988;23:707–712[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
  7. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1995;25:800–802[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
  8. Nissen SE, Pepine CJ, Bashore TM. ACC Position Statement. Cardiac angiography without cine film: erecting a "tower of babel’ in the cardiac catheterization laboratory. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1994;24:834–837[ISI][Medline]
  9. Pennebaker WB, Mitchell JL. JPEG Still Image Data Compression Standard. New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold. 1993;:
  10. Lane, TJ, Gladstone, P, Ortiz, L, Boucher, J, Crocker, L, Independent JPEG Group’s free JPEG Software, Release 6a, 1996
  11. Van Lysel MS, Ergun DL, Miller WP. Cardiac digital angiography and dual-energy subtraction imaging: current and future trends. Am J Card Imaging. 1987;1:254–266
  12. Mistretta CA, Peppler WW. Digital cardiac x-ray image: fundamental priciples. Am J Card Imaging. 1988;2:26–39
  13. Brennecke R, Lang M, Fritsch JP, Erbel R, Meyer J. A framework for PACS development in cardiology. IEEE Comput Cardiol. 1992;:259–261
  14. Condit PB. Requirements for cardiac interchange media and the role of recordable CD. Int J Card Imaging. 1995;11:153–157
  15. Whiting JS, Eckstein M, Morioka C, Staffel BK, Eigler NL. Lossy image compression has insignificant effect on the accuracy and precision of quantitative coronary angiography (abstr). Circulation. 1993;88:I–652
  16. Rigolin VH, Robiolio PA, Spero LA. Lossy Joint Photographic Expert’s Group (JPEG) compression of digital coronary angiograms does not affect visual or quantitative assessment of coronary artery stenosis severity. Am J Cardiol. 1996;78:131–135[ISI][Medline]
  17. Baker WA, Hearne SE, Spero LA. Lossy (15:1) JPEG compression of digital coronary angiograms does not limit detection of subtle morphological features. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1997;96:1157–1164
  18. Whiting J, Eckstein M, Honig D, Gu S, Einav S, Eigler N. Effect of lossy image compression on observer performance in dynamically displayed digital coronary angiograms (abstr). Circulation. 1992;86:I–444
  19. Zir LM, Miller SW, Dinsmore RE, Gilbert JP, Harthorne JW. Interobserver variability in coronary angiography. Circulation. 1976;53:627–632[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  20. DeRouen TA, Murray JA, Owen W. Variability in the analysis of coronary angiograms. Circulation. 1977;55:324–328[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  21. Detre KM, Wright E, Murphy ML, Takaro T. Observer agreement in evaluating coronary angiograms. Circulation. 1975;52:979–985[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  22. Beauman GJ, Vogel RA. Accuracy of individual and panel visual interpretations of coronary arteriograms: implications for clinical decisions. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1990;16:108–113[Abstract]
  23. Fisher LD, Judkins MP, Lesperance J. Reproducibility of coronary arteriographic reading in the coronary artery surgery study (CASS). Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn. 1982;8:565–575[ISI][Medline]

Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 RadiologyHome page
J. P. Ko, J. Chang, E. Bomsztyk, J. S. Babb, D. P. Naidich, and H. Rusinek
Effect of CT Image Compression on Computer-assisted Lung Nodule Volume Measurement
Radiology, October 1, 2005; 237(1): 83 - 88.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg.Home page
R.F. Bonvini, L. Caoduro, A. Menafoglio, L. Calanca, L. von Segesser, and A. Gallino
Telemedicine for cardiac surgery candidates
Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg., September 1, 2002; 22(3): 377 - 380.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Eur Heart JHome page
S.E. Nissen, J.W. Hirshfeld, and R. Simon
The international angiographic compression study
Eur. Heart J., April 2, 2000; 21(8): 601 - 603.
[PDF]

Home page
 Eur Heart JHome page
J.C Tuinenburg, G Koning, E Hekking, A.H Zwinderman, T Becker, R Simon, and J.H.C Reiber
American College of Cardiology/ European Society of Cardiology international study of angiographic data compression phase II. The effects of varying JPEG data compression levels on the quantitative assessment of the degree of stenosis in digital coronary angiography
Eur. Heart J., April 2, 2000; 21(8): 679 - 686.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Eur Heart JHome page
R Brennecke, U Burgel, R Simon, G Rippin, H.P Fritsch, T Becker, and S.E Nissen
American College of Cardiology/ European Society of Cardiology international study of angiographic data compression phase III. Measurement of image quality differences at varying levels of data compression
Eur. Heart J., April 2, 2000; 21(8): 687 - 696.
[Abstract] [PDF]

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (8)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kerensky, R.A
Right arrow Articles by Nissen, S.E
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Kerensky, R.A
Right arrow Articles by Nissen, S.E
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?