Copyright © 2000 by the European Society of Cardiology.
American College of Cardiology/ European Society of Cardiology international study of angiographic data compression phase III. Measurement of image quality differences at varying levels of data compression
a II Medical Clinic, Johannes-Gutenberg-University, Mainz, Germany
b Medical Clinic, Albrechts University, Kiel, Germany
c Department of Medical Statistics, Johannes-Gutenberg-University, Mainz, Germany
d Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, Ohio
revised June 1, 1999; accepted December 1, 1999
Abstract
Objectives We sought to investigate up to which level of Joint Photographic Experts Group (JPEG) data compression the perceived image quality and the detection of diagnostic features remain equivalent to the quality and detectability found in uncompressed coronary angiograms.
Background Digital coronary angiograms represent an enormous amount of data and therefore require costly computerized communication and archiving systems. Earlier studies on the viability of medical image compression were not fully conclusive.
Methods Twenty-one raters evaluated sets of 91 cine runs. Uncompressed and compressed versions of the images were presented side by side on one monitor, and image quality differences were assessed on a scale featuring six scores. In addition, the raters had to detect pre-defined clinical features. Compression ratios (CR) were 6:1, 10:1 and 16:1. Statistical evaluation was based on descriptive statistics and on the equivalence t -test.
Results At the lowest CR (CR 6:1), there was already a small (15%) increase in assigning the aesthetic quality score indicating "quality difference is barely discernible—the images are equivalent.’ At CR 10:1 and CR 16:1, close to 10% and 55%, respectively, of the compressed images were rated to be "clearly degraded, but still adequate for clinical use’ or worse. Concerning diagnostic features, at CR 10:1 and CR 16:1 the error rate was 9·6% and 13·1%, respectively, compared with 9% for the baseline error rate in uncompressed images.
Conclusions Compression at CR 6:1 provides equivalence with the original cine runs. If CR 16:1 were used, one would have to tolerate a significant increase in the diagnostic error rate over the baseline error rate. At CR 10:1, intermediate results were obtained.
f1 Correspondence: Dr. Rüdiger Brennecke, II Medical Clinic, Johannes-Gutenberg-University Hospital, D55131 Mainz, Germany, E-mail: incis.rb@uni-mainz.de
References
- Simon R, Brennecke R, Hess O, Meier B, Reiner H, Zeelenberg C. Recommendations for digital imaging in angiocardiography. Eur Heart J. 1994;15:1332–1334
[Free Full Text] - J Am Coll Cardiol. 1995;25:800–802[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
- Pennebecker WB, Mitchell JL. JPEG Still Image Compression Standard. New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold; 1993. p. 78
- Rigolin VH, Robiolio PA, Spero LA. Lossy JPEG compression of digital coronary angiograms does not affect visual or quantitative assessment of coronary stenosis severity. Am J Cardiol. 1996;78:131–135[Web of Science][Medline]
- Baker WA, Hearne SE, Spero LA. Lossy (15:1) JPEG compression of digital coronary angiograms does not limit detection of subtle morphological features. Circulation. 1997;96:1157–1164
[Abstract/Free Full Text] - Koning G, van Meurs BA, Haas H, Reiber JHC. Effects of data compression on quantitative coronary measurements. Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn. 1995;34:175–185[Web of Science][Medline]
- Koning G, Beretta P, Zwart P, Hekking E, Reiber JHC. Effect of lossy data compression on quantitative coronary measurements. Int J Card Imaging. 1997;13:261–270[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
- Kirkeeide R, Beretta P, Smalling RW, Anderson HV, Schroth G, Gould KL. Diagnostic content is unaffected by 12:1 image compression (abstr). J Am Coll Cardiol. 1997;29:35[Abstract]
- Fritsch JP, Negwer F, Renneisen U, Brennecke R, Meyer J. Visual and quantitative analysis of coronary angiograms after irreversible data compression (abstr). Eur Heart J. 1994;15:46
- Karson TH, DeFranco A, Evans DJ. Replacement of cine film by digital angiography: clinical evaluation of a real-time optical storage system (abstr). J Am Coll Cardiol. 1993;:2156A
- Silber S, Dörr R, Zindler G, Mühling H, Diebel T. Impact of various compression rates on interpretation of digital coronary angiograms. Int J Cardiol. 1997;60:195–200[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
- Robinson PJA. Radiology’s Achilles’ heel: error and variation in the interpretation of the Röntgen image. Br J Radiol. 1997;70:1085–1098[Abstract]
- Tuinenburg JC, Koning G, Hekking. American College of Cardiology/European Society of Cardiology international study of angiographia data compression phase II: the effects of varying JPEG data compression levels on the quantitative assessment of the degree of stenosis in coronary angiography. Eur Heart J. 2000;21:679–686
[Abstract/Free Full Text] - Kerensky RA, Cusma J, Kubilis P. American College of Cardiology/European Society of Cardiology international study of angiographic data compression phase I: the effects of lossy data compression of diagnostic features in digital coronary angiography. Eur Heart J. 2000;21:668–678
[Abstract/Free Full Text] - Goldberg MA, Pivovarov M, Mayo-Smith WW. Application of wavelet compression to digitized radiographs. AJR. 1994;163:463–468
[Abstract/Free Full Text] - Chester S. Review of equivalence and hypothesis testing. Am Statistical Ass Proc Biopharmaceutical Section. 1986;:177–182
- Ho SY, Zhu G, Zhao W. Statistical testing for equivalence. Am Statistical Ass Proc Biopharmaceutical Section. 1993;:240–244
CiteULike 
Connotea 
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  G. Bernardi, R. Padovani, L. Spedicato, W. Desmet, M. R. Malisan, J. D. Giannuleas, E. Neofotistou, A. Manginas, Z. Olivari, J. Cosgrave, et al. Image quality criteria in cardiology Radiat Prot Dosimetry, December 1, 2005; 117(1-3): 102 - 106. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 R.F. Bonvini, L. Caoduro, A. Menafoglio, L. Calanca, L. von Segesser, and A. Gallino Telemedicine for cardiac surgery candidates Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg., September 1, 2002; 22(3): 377 - 380. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 S.E. Nissen, J.W. Hirshfeld, and R. Simon The international angiographic compression study Eur. Heart J., April 2, 2000; 21(8): 601 - 603. [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
J.C Tuinenburg, G Koning, E Hekking, A.H Zwinderman, T Becker, R Simon, and J.H.C Reiber American College of Cardiology/ European Society of Cardiology international study of angiographic data compression phase II. The effects of varying JPEG data compression levels on the quantitative assessment of the degree of stenosis in digital coronary angiography Eur. Heart J., April 2, 2000; 21(8): 679 - 686. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||