Skip Navigation

European Heart Journal 2000 21(9):707-709; doi:10.1053/euhj.1999.2022
Copyright © 2000 by the European Society of Cardiology.
This Article
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow E-letters: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when E-letters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Higano, S.T.
Right arrow Articles by Gersh, B.J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Higano, S.T.
Right arrow Articles by Gersh, B.J.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Editorial

Coronary angiography and outcome following acute myocardial infarction

S.T. Higano and B.J. Gersh

Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, U.S.A.

References

  1. Marrugat J, Ferrières J, Masià R, Ruidavets J, Sala J. Differences in use of coronary angiography and outcome of myocardial infarction in Toulouse (France) and Gerona (Spain). Eur Heart J. 2000;21:740–746[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  2. Jha P, Deboer D, Sykora K, Naylor CD. Characteristics and mortality outcomes of thrombolysis trial participants and nonparticipants: a population-based comparison. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1996;27:1335–1342[Abstract]
  3. Brown N, Melville M, Gray D, Young T, Skene AM, Wilcox RG, Hampton JR. Relevance of clinical trial results in myocardial infarction to medical practice: comparison of four year outcome in participants of a thrombolytic trial, patients receiving routine thrombolysis, and those deemed ineligible for thrombolysis. Heart. 1999;81:598–602[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  4. Hochman JS, Sleeper LA, Webb JG. Early revascularization in acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock. SHOCK Investigators. Should We Emergently Revascularize Occluded Coronaries for Cardiogenic Shock. N Engl J Med. 1999;34:625–634
  5. Friedmann E, Thomas SA. Pet Ownership, Social Support, and One-Year Survival After Acute Myocardial Infarction in the Cardiac Arrhythmia Suppression Trial (CAST). Am J Cardiol. 1995;76:1213–1217[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
  6. Jollis JG, DeLong ER, Peterson ED, Muhlbaier LH, Fortin DF, Califf RM, Mark DB. Outcome of acute myocardial infarction according to the speciality of the admitting physician. N Engl J Med. 1996;335:1880–1887[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  7. Califf RM, Topol EJ, Gersh BJ. From myocardial salvage to patient salvage in acute myocardial infarction: the role of reperfusion therapy. [Review]. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1989;14:1382–1388[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
  8. Mark DB, Naylor CD, Hlatky MA. Use of medical resources and quality of life after acute myocardial infarction in Canada and the United States. N Engl J Med. 1994;331:1130–1135[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  9. Batchelor WB, Peterson ED, Mark DB. A comparison of U.S. and Canadian cardiac catheterization practices in detecting severe coronary artery disease after myocardial infarction: efficiency, yield and long-term implications. J Am Coll Cardol. 1999;34:12–19[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  10. Lancet. 1999;354:708–715[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
  11. Passamani E, Davis KB, Gillespie MJ, Killip T. A randomized trial of coronary artery bypass surgery. Survival of patients with a low ejection fraction. N Engl J Med. 1985;312:1665–1671[Abstract]
  12. Circulation. 1983;68:939–950[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  13. Boden WE, O'Rourke RA, Crawford MH. Outcomes in patients with acute non-Q-wave myocardial infarction randomly assigned to an invasive as compared with a conservative management strategy. Veterans Affairs Non-Q-Wave Infarction Strategies in Hospital (VANQWISH) Trial Investigators. N Engl J Med. 1998;338:1785–1792[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  14. Doorey A, Patel S, Reese C, O'Connor R, Geloo N, Sutherland S, Price N, Gleasner E, Rodrigue R. Dangers of delay of initiation of either thrombolysis or primary angioplasty in acute myocardial infarction with increasing use of primary angioplasty. Am J Cardiol. 1998;81:1173–1177[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
  15. Caputo RP, Ho KK, Stoler RC, Sukin CA, Lopez JJ, Cohen DJ, Kuntz RE, Berman A, Carrozza JP, Baim DS. Effect of continuous quality improvement analysis on the delivery of primary percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty for acute myocardial infarction. Am J Cardiol. 1997;79:1159–1164[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?



This Article
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow E-letters: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when E-letters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Higano, S.T.
Right arrow Articles by Gersh, B.J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Higano, S.T.
Right arrow Articles by Gersh, B.J.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?