Copyright © 2001 by the European Society of Cardiology.
Cost-efficacy in interventional cardiology; results from the EPISTENT study
a Erasmus University, Institute for Medical Technology Assessment, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
b Utrecht University, Department of Pharmaco-epidemiology and Pharmacotherapy, Utrecht, The Netherlands
c University Medical Center Utrecht, Julius Center for General Practice and Patient-oriented Research, Utrecht, The Netherlands
revised November 13, 2000; accepted November 22, 2000
Abstract
Aims The EPISTENT study has demonstrated that the combined use of abciximab and stenting as an adjunct to PTCA leads to increased event-free survival compared to either using abciximab or stenting alone. However, this combined strategy may be costly and the additional costs have to be weighted against the additional effects.
Method and Results The 6-months efficacy data from the EPISTENT study are combined with Dutch estimates of unit costs. Adding a stent to a procedure with abciximab further decreases the number of revascularizations at an extra cost of Euros12000 (95% upper limit (u.l.) Euros31000) per additional major adverse cardiac event-free survivor. Adding abciximab to a stenting procedure decreases the incidence of myocardial infarctions at an extra cost of Euros13000 (95% u.l. Euros27000) per additional myocardial infarction-free survivor. In the subgroup of diabetics, adding abciximab improves revascularization rates as well, resulting in a cost-efficacy rate of Euros2000 (95% u.l. Euros25000) per additional MACE-free survivor, with uncertainty regions indicating potential costs savings.
Conclusion The combination of stenting and abciximab costs about Euros13000 to avoid one event after PTCA. In diabetic patients the strategy may be cost-saving.
Key Words: Cost-effectiveness, platelet aggregation inhibitors, stents, clinical trials, diabetes mellitus
f1 Correspondence: Jeannette E. F. Zwart-van Rijkom, Department of Pharmaco-epidemiology and Pharmacotherapy, Utrecht University, P.O. Box 80082, 3508 TB Utrecht, The Netherlands.
References
- Fischman DL, Leon MB, Baim DS. A randomized comparison of coronary-stent placement and balloon angioplasty in the treatment of coronary artery disease. Stent Restenosis Study Investigators. N Engl J Med. 1994;331:496501
[Abstract/Free Full Text] - Grines CL, Cox DA, Stone GW. Coronary angioplasty with or without stent implantation for acute myocardial infarction. Stent Primary Angioplasty in Myocardial Infarction Study Group. N Engl J Med. 1999;341:19491956
[Abstract/Free Full Text] - Erbel R, Haude M, Hopp HW. Coronary-artery stenting compared with balloon angioplasty for restenosis after initial balloon angioplasty. Restenosis Stent Study Group. N Engl J Med. 1998;339:16721678
[Abstract/Free Full Text] - Serruys PW, de Jaegere P, Kiemeneij F. A comparison of balloon-expandable-stent implantation with balloon angioplasty in patients with coronary artery disease. Benestent Study Group. N Engl J Med. 1994;331:489495
[Abstract/Free Full Text] - Serruys PW, van Hout B, Bonnier H. Randomised comparison of implantation of heparin-coated stents with balloon angioplasty in selected patients with coronary artery disease (Benestent II). Lancet. 1998;352:673681[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
- Sirnes PA, Golf S, Myreng Y. Stenting in Chronic Coronary Occlusion (SICCO): a randomized, controlled trial of adding stent implantation after successful angioplasty. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1996;28:14441451[Abstract]
- Versaci F, Gaspardone A, Tomai F, Crea F, Chiariello L, Gioffre PA. A comparison of coronary-artery stenting with angioplasty for isolated stenosis of the proximal left anterior descending coronary artery. N Engl J Med. 1997;336:817822
[Abstract/Free Full Text] - N Engl J Med. 1994;330:956961
[Abstract/Free Full Text] - Topol EJ, Califf RM, Weisman HF. Randomised trial of coronary intervention with antibody against platelet IIb/IIIa integrin for reduction of clinical restenosis: results at six months. The EPIC Investigators. Lancet. 1994;343:881886[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
- Lancet. 1997;349:14291435[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
- N Engl J Med. 1997;336:16891696
[Abstract/Free Full Text] - Stables RH. Routine use of abciximab in coronary stenting? Lancet. 1998;352:8182[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
- Lancet. 1998;352:8792[Web of Science][Medline]
- Lincoff AM, Califf RM, Moliterno DJ. Complementary clinical benefits of coronary-artery stenting and blockade of platelet glycoprotein IIb/IIIa receptors. Evaluation of Platelet IIb/IIIa Inhibition in Stenting Investigators. N Engl J Med. 1999;341:319327
[Abstract/Free Full Text] - Marso SP, Lincoff AM, Ellis SG. Optimizing the percutaneous interventional outcomes for patients with diabetes mellitus : results of the EPISTENT (Evaluation of platelet IIb/IIIa inhibitor for stenting trial) diabetic substudy. Circulation. 1999;100:24772484
[Abstract/Free Full Text] - Van Hout BA, van der Woude T, de Jaegere PP. Cost effectiveness of stent implantation versus PTCA: the BENESTENT experience. Semin Interv Cardiol. 1996;1:263268[Medline]
- Van Hout BA, Al MJ, Gordon GS, Rutten FFH. Costs, effects and C/E-ratios alongside a clinical trial. Health Economics. 1994;3:309319[Web of Science][Medline]
- van Hout BA, Simoons ML. Costs and effects of c7E3 in high risk PTCA patients. An indirect analysis for The Netherlands. Eur Heart J. 1995;16:8185
[Abstract/Free Full Text] - van Hout BA, Bowman L, Zelinger DJ, Simoons ML. Costs and effects in therapy for acute coronary syndromes: the case of abciximab in high-risk patients undergoing percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty in the EPIC study. Evaluation of 7E3 for the Prevention of Ischemic Complications. Eur Heart J. 1998;19:D5966
- Topol EJ, Mark DB, Lincoff AM. Outcomes at 1 year and economic implications of platelet glycoprotein IIb/IIIa blockade in patients undergoing coronary stenting: results from a multicentre randomised trial. Lancet. 1999;354:2019[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
- Jacobs AK. Coronary stentshave they fulfilled their promise? N Engl J Med. 1999;341:20052006
[Free Full Text] - Health Council of the Netherlands: Cardiac Surgery and Interventional Cardiology Committee, Cardiac Surgery and Interventional Cardiology for Adults, The Hague, Health Council of the Netherlands, 1995, 79, 81
- Carrozza JP Jr., Kuntz RE, Fishman RF, Baim DS. Restenosis after arterial injury caused by coronary stenting in patients with diabetes mellitus. Ann Intern Med. 1993;118:344349
[Abstract/Free Full Text] - Van Belle E, Bauters C, Hubert E. Restenosis rates in diabetic patients: a comparison of coronary stenting and balloon angioplasty in native coronary vessels. Circulation. 1997;96:14541460
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
S. Elezi, A. Dibra, U. Folkerts, J. Mehilli, S. Heigl, A. Schomig, and A. Kastrati Cost Analysis From Two Randomized Trials of Sirolimus-Eluting Stents Versus Paclitaxel-Eluting Stents in High-Risk Patients With Coronary Artery Disease J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., July 18, 2006; 48(2): 262 - 267. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. A Crouch, J. M Nappi, and K. I Cheang Glycoprotein IIb/IIIa Receptor Inhibitors in Percutaneous Coronary Intervention and Acute Coronary Syndrome Ann. Pharmacother., June 1, 2003; 37(6): 860 - 875. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
W.S. Weintraub Economics of coronary stenting and GPIIb/IIIa blockade Eur. Heart J., August 2, 2001; 22(16): 1366 - 1368. [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||


