Copyright © 2001 by the European Society of Cardiology.
Editorials
Is there a future for coronary physiological evaluation in clinical decision making?
Hospital Santa Cruz, Lisbon, Portugal
References
- Nissen SE, Yock P. Intravascular ultrasound. Novel Pathophysiological insights and current clinical applications. Circulation. 2001;103:604–616
[Abstract/Free Full Text] - Pasterkamp G, Falk E, Woutman H, Borst C. Techniques characterizing the coronary atherosclerotic plaque: influence on clinical decision making? J Am Coll Cardiol. 2000;36:13–21
[Abstract/Free Full Text] - Kern M J. Coronary physiology revisited. practical insights from the cardiac catheterization laboratory. Circulation. 2000;101:1344–1351
[Abstract/Free Full Text] - Pijls NHJ, de Bruyne B. Fractional flow reserve and clinical outcome. Pijls N, de Bruyne B. Coronary Pressure. Dordrecht, Boston, London: Kluwer Academic Publishers; 2000. p. 307–326
- Sutsch G, Buchi M, Zeiher AM. Effects of calcium antagonism and HMG-coenzyme reductase inhibition on endothelial function and atherosclerosis: rationale and outline of the ENCORE trials. Eur Heart J Supplements. 1999;1:M27–M32
- Serruys PW, di Mario C, Piek J. Prognostic value of intracoronary flow velocity and diameter stenosis in assessing the short- and long-term outcomes of coronary balloon angioplasty. The DEBATE Study (Doppler Endpoints Balloon Angioplasty Trial in Europe). Circulation. 1997;96:3369–3377
[Abstract/Free Full Text] - Piek JJ, Boersma E, Voskuil M. The immediate and long-term effect of optimal balloon angioplasty on the absolute coronary blood flow velocity reserve: a subanalysis of the DEBATE-study. Eur Heart J. 2001;22:1725–1732
[Abstract/Free Full Text] - van Liebergen RAM, Piek JJ, Koch KT. Immediate and long-term effect of balloon angioplasty or stent implantation on the absolute and relative coronary blood flow velocity reserve. Circulation. 1998;98:2133–2140
[Abstract/Free Full Text] - Ward MR, Pasterkamp G, Yeung AC, Borst C. Arterial remodeling. mechanisms and clinical implications. Circulation. 2000;102:1186–1191
[Free Full Text] - Serruys PW, de Bruyne B, Carlier S. Randomized comparison of primary stenting and provisional balloon angioplasty guided by flow velocity measurement. Circulation. 2000;102:2930–2937
[Abstract/Free Full Text] - Di Mario C, Moses JW, Anderson TJ. randomized comparison of elective Stent implantation and coronary balloon angioplasty guided by online quantitative angiography and intracoronary Doppler. Circulation. 2000;102:2938–2944
[Abstract/Free Full Text] - Lafont A, Dubois-Randé JL, Steg PG. The French Randomized Optimal Stenting Trial: a prospective evaluation of provisional stenting guided by coronary velocity reserve and quantitative coronary angiography. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2000;36:404–409
[Abstract/Free Full Text] - Weaver WD, Reisman MA, Griffin JJ. Optimum Percutaneous Transluminal Coronary Angioplasty Compared with Routine Stent Strategy Trial (OPUS-1): a randomized trial. Lancet. 2000;355:2199–2203[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
- Meuwissen M, Chamuleau SAJ, Siebes M. Role of variability in microvascular resistance on fractional flow reserve and coronary blood flow velocity reserve in intermediate coronary lesions. Circulation. 2001;103:184–187
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
CiteULike 
Connotea 
Del.icio.us What's this?
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||