Skip Navigation

European Heart Journal 2001 22(21):1973-1977; doi:10.1053/euhj.2001.2847
Copyright © 2001 by the European Society of Cardiology.
This Article
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow E-letters: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when E-letters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Windecker, S.
Right arrow Articles by Meier, B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Windecker, S.
Right arrow Articles by Meier, B.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Editorials

All stents are not alike or is the difference in the eye of the observer only?

S. Windecker and B. Meier

Cardiology, Swiss Cardiovascular Center, Bern, Switzerland

References

  1. Gershlick AH. Role of stenting in coronary revascularization. Heart. 2001;86:104–112[Free Full Text]
  2. Roubin GS, Cannon AD, Agrawal SK. Intracoronary stenting for acute and threatened closure complicating percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty. Circulation. 1992;85:916–927[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  3. Windecker S, Meier B. Intervention in coronary artery disease. Heart. 2000;83:481–490[Free Full Text]
  4. Hoffmann R, Mintz GS, Dussaillant GR. Patterns and mechanisms of in-stent restenosis. A serial intravascular ultrasound study [see comments]. Circulation. 1996;94:1247–1254[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  5. Mehran R, Dangas G, Abizaid AS. Angiographic patterns of in-stent restenosis: classification and implications for long-term outcome. Circulation. 1999;100:1872–1878[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  6. Edelman ER, Rogers C. Pathobiologic responses to stenting. Am J Cardiol. 1998;81:4E–6E[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
  7. Sriram V, Patterson C. Cell cycle in vasculoproliferative diseases: potential interventions and routes of delivery. Circulation. 2001;103:2414–2419[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  8. Komatsu R, Ueda M, Naruko T, Kojima A, Becker AE. Neointimal tissue response at sites of coronary stenting in humans: macroscopic, histological, and immunohistochemical analyses. Circulation. 1998;98:224–233[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  9. Farb A, Sangiorgi G, Carter AJ. Pathology of acute and chronic coronary stenting in humans. Circulation. 1999;99:44–52[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  10. Schwartz RS, Huber KC, Murphy JG. Restenosis and the proportional neointimal response to coronary artery injury: results in a porcine model [see comments]. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1992;19:267–274[Abstract]
  11. Kornowski R, Hong MK, Tio FO, Bramwell O, Wu H, Leon MB. In-stent restenosis: contributions of inflammatory responses and arterial injury to neointimal hyperplasia. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1998;31:224–230[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  12. Rogers C, Edelman ER. Endovascular stent design dictates experimental restenosis and thrombosis. Circulation. 1995;91:2995–3001[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  13. Rogers C, Tseng DY, Squire JC, Edelman ER. Balloon-artery interactions during stent placement: a finite element analysis approach to pressure, compliance, and stent design as contributors to vascular injury. Circ Res. 1999;84:378–383[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  14. Garasic JM, Edelman ER, Squire JC, Seifert P, Williams MS, Rogers C. Stent and artery geometry determine intimal thickening independent of arterial injury. Circulation. 2000;101:812–818[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  15. Leon MB, Popma JJ, O'Saughnessy C, Dean LS, Lansky AJ, Fry ETA, Curran MJ. Quantitative angiographic outcomes after Gianturco-Roubin stent implantation in complex lesions. Circulation. 1997;96:I-593
  16. Edelman ER, Rogers C. Stent-versus-stent equivalency trials: are some stents more equal than others? Circulation. 1999;100:896–898[Free Full Text]
  17. Baim DS, Cutlip DE, O'Shaughnessy CD. Final results of a randomized trial comparing the NIR stent to the Palmaz-Schatz stent for narrowings in native coronary arteries. Am J Cardiol. 2001;87:152–156[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
  18. Baim DS, Cutlip DE, Midei M. Final results of a randomized trial comparing the MULTI-LINK stent with the Palmaz-Schatz stent for narrowings in native coronary arteries. Am J Cardiol. 2001;87:157–162[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
  19. Hoffmann R, Jansen C, König A. Stent design related neointimal tissue proliferation in human coronary arteries. An intravascular ultrasound study. Eur Heart J. 2001;22:2007–2014[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  20. Rogers C, Parikh S, Seifert P, Edelman ER. Endogenous cell seeding. Remnant endothelium after stenting enhances vascular repair. Circulation. 1996;94:2909–2914[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  21. Kuntz RE, Safian RD, Carrozza JP, Fishman RF, Mansour M, Baim DS. The importance of acute luminal diameter in determining restenosis after coronary atherectomy or stenting. Circulation. 1992;86:1827–1835[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  22. Serruys PW, Kay IP, Disco C, Deshpande NV, de Feyter PJ. Periprocedural quantitative coronary angiography after Palmaz-Schatz stent implantation predicts the restenosis rate at six months: results of a meta-analysis of the BElgian NEtherlands Stent study (BENESTENT) I, BENESTENT II Pilot, BENESTENT II and MUSIC trials. Multicenter Ultrasound Stent In Coronaries. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1999;34:1067–1074[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  23. Hoffmann R, Haager P, Mintz GS. The impact of high pressure vs low pressure stent implantation on intimal hyperplasia and follow-up lumen dimensions. Eur Heart J. 2001;22:2015–2024[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  24. Dirschinger J, Kastrati A, Neumann FJ. Influence of balloon pressure during stent placement in native coronary arteries on early and late angiographic and clinical outcome: A randomized evaluation of high-pressure inflation. Circulation. 1999;100:918–923[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?



This Article
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow E-letters: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when E-letters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Windecker, S.
Right arrow Articles by Meier, B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Windecker, S.
Right arrow Articles by Meier, B.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?