Skip Navigation

European Heart Journal 2001 22(21):2029-2031; doi:10.1053/euhj.2001.2815
Copyright © 2001 by the European Society of Cardiology.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (3)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Scheller, B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Scheller, B.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Letters to the Editor

A reply

B. Scheller

Internal Medicine III (Cardiology/angiology), University of Saarland, D 66421, Homburg/Saar, Germany

References

  1. Davidson CJ, Laskey WK, Hermiller JB. Randomized trial of contrast media utilization in high-risk PTCA: the COURT trial. Circulation. 2000;101:2172–2177[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  2. Hay K, Bull S. An analysis of platelet activation and aggregation produced by three classes of contrast media. JVIR. 1995;6:211–217[ISI][Medline]
  3. Scheller B, Heib KD, Müller M, Hennen B, Özbek C, Schieffer H. Röntgenkontrastmittel in der invasiven Kardiologie, Nebenwirkungen und differenzierter Einsatz. Z Kardiol. 1998;87:545–552[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
  4. Sutton A, Finn P, Grech E. Early and late reactions after the use of iopamidol 340, ioxaglate 320, and iodixanol 320 in cardiac catheterization. Am Heart J. 2001;141:677–683[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
  5. Schräder R, Esch I, Ensslen R. A randomized trial comparing the impact of a nonionic (Iomeprol) versus an ionic (ioxaglatee) low osmolar contrast medium on abrupt vessel closure and ischemic complications after coronary angioplasty. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1999;33:395–402[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  6. Heptinstall S, White A, Edwards N. Differential effects of three radiographic contrast media on platelet aggregation and degranulation: implications for clinical practice? Br J Haematol. 1998;103:1023–1030[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
  7. Markou CP, Chronos NA, Hanson SR. Antithrombotic effects of ionic and nonionic contrast media in nonhuman primates. Thromb Haemost. 2001;85:488–493[ISI][Medline]
  8. Bertrand ME, Esplugas E, Piessens J, Rasch W. Influence of a nonionic, iso-osmolar contrast medium (iodixanol) versus an ionic, low-osmolar contrast medium (ioxaglate) on major adverse cardiac events in patients undergoing percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty: A multicenter, randomized, double-blind study. Visipaque in Percutaneous Transluminal Coronary Angioplasty VIP Trial Investigators. Circulation. 2000;101:131–136[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  9. Scheller B, Hennen B, Thünenkötter T, Mrowietz C, Markwirth T, Schieffer H, Jung F. Influence of X-ray contrast media on rheological properties after coronary angiography. Thromb Res. 1999;96:253–260[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
  10. Grabowski E, Rodriguez M, McDonnell S. Platelet adhesion/aggregation in an in vitro model of coronary artery stenosis. Cath Cardiovasc Diagn. 1993;28:65–71[ISI][Medline]
  11. Arora R, Khandelwal M, Gopal A. In vivo effects of nonionic and ionic contrast media on beta-thromboglobulin and fibrinopeptide levels. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1991;17:1533–1536[Abstract]
  12. Davidson CJ, Mark DB, Pieper KS. Thrombotic and cardiovascular complications related to nonionic contrast media during cardiac catheterization: analysis of 8,517 patients. Am J Cardiol. 1990;65:1481–1484[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
  13. Gasperetti CM, Gonias SL, Gimple LW, Powers ER. Platelet activation during coronary angioplasty in humans. Circulation. 1993;88:2728–2734[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  14. Gawaz M, Neumann FJ, Schomig A. Evaluation of platelet membrane glycoproteins in coronary artery disease: consequences for diagnosis and therapy. Circulation. 1999;99:E1–E11
  15. Inoue T, Sohma R, Miyazaki T, Iwasaki Y, Yaguchi I, Morooka S. Comparison of activation process of platelets and neutrophils after coronary stent implantation versus balloon angioplasty for stable angina pectoris. Am J Cardiol. 2000;86:1057–1062[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]

Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Eur Heart JHome page
B. Scheller
A reply
Eur. Heart J., January 2, 2002; 23(2): 173 - 175.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur Heart JHome page
B. Scheller
A reply
Eur. Heart J., November 1, 2001; 22(21): 2028 - 2029.
[PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (3)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Scheller, B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Scheller, B.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?