Copyright © 2002 by the European Society of Cardiology.
An evaluation of the strategy of maintenance of sinus rhythm by antiarrhythmic drug therapy after ablation and pacing therapy in patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation
a Department of Cardiology and Arrhythmologic Center, Ospedali Riuniti, Lavagna, Italy
b Department of Interventional Cardiology and Arrhythmologic Center, Ospedale S Maria Nuova, Reggio Emilia, Italy
c Department of Cardiology, Istituto Humanitas, Milano, Italy
d Department of Cardiology, Ospedale Cisanello, Pisa, Italy
e Department of Cardiology, Ospedale S. Anna, Como, Italy
f Department of Cardiology, Ospedale S. Bortolo, Vicenza, Italy
g Department of Cardiology, Ospedale Civile, Cento, Italy
h Department of Cardiology, Ospedale S Croce, Cuneo, Italy
i Department of Cardiology, Ospedale S Gerardo, Monza, Italy
j Department of Cardiology, Ospedale Civile P. Cosma, Camposampiero, Italy
revised August 7, 2001; accepted August 15, 2001
Abstract
Aims Permanent atrial fibrillation develops in many patients after ablation and pacing therapy. We compared a strategy that initially allowed patients to remain in atrial fibrillation with a strategy that initially attempted to restore and maintain sinus rhythm.
Methods and Results In this multicentre randomized controlled trial, 68 patients affected by severely symptomatic paroxysmal atrial fibrillation were assigned, after successful atrioventricular junction ablation and pacing treatment, to antiarrhythmic drug therapy with amiodarone, propafenone, flecainide or sotalol and were compared with 69 patients assigned, after successful AV junction ablation and pacing treatment, to no antiarrhythmic drug therapy. The patients were followed-up for 12 to 24 months (mean 16±4). The drug arm patients had a 57% reduction in the risk of developing permanent atrial fibrillation (21% vs 37%,P =0·02). Evaluation after 12 months revealed similar quality of life scores and echocardiographic parameters in the two groups, but the drug arm patients had more episodes of heart failure and hospitalizations (P=0·05). The outcome was similar between the 40 patients who developed permanent atrial fibrillation and the 97 who did not.
Conclusion Conventional antiarrhythmic therapy reduces the risk of development of permanent atrial fibrillation after ablation and pacing therapy. The present data do not support the concept that the development of permanent atrial fibrillation is related to an adverse outcome when a perfect control of heart rate is obtained by ablation and pacing. Copyright 2002 The European Society of Cardiology. Published by Elsevier Science Ltd. All rights reserved
Key Words: Catheter ablation, atrial fibrillation, pacemakers, antiarrhythmia agents, atrioventricular node
f1 Correspondence: Michele Brignole, Department of Cardiology and Arrhythmologic Centre, Ospedali Riuniti, Via don Bobbio, 16032 Lavagna, Italy.
References
- Gianfranchi L, Brignole M, Menozzi C. Progression of permanent atrial fibrillation after atrioventricular junction ablation and dual-chamber pacemaker implantation in patients with paroxysmal atrial tachyarrhythmias. Am J Cardiol. 1998;81:351354[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
- Brignole M, Gianfranchi L, Menozzi C. An assessment of atrioventricular junction ablation and DDDR mode-switching pacemaker versus pharmacological treatment in patients with severely symptomatic paroxysmal atrial fibrillation. A randomized controlled study. Circulation. 1997;96:26172624
[Abstract/Free Full Text] - Rector TS, Kubo SH, Cohn JN. Patients' self-assessment of their congestive heart failure. Part II: Content, reliability and validity of a new measure, the Minnesota Living with Heart Failure Questionnaire. Heart failure. 1987;3:198209
- Brignole M, Gianfranchi L, Menozzi C. Influence of atrioventricular junction radiofrequency ablation in patients with chronic atrial fibrillation and flutter on quality of life and cardiac performance. Am J Cardiol. 1994;74:242246[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
- Brignole M, Menozzi C, Gianfranchi L. Assessment of atrioventricular junction ablation and VVIR pacemaker versus pharmacological treatment in patients with heart failure and chronic atrial fibrillation. A randomized controlled study. Circulation. 1998;98:953960
[Abstract/Free Full Text] - Prystowsky E, Benson DW, Fuster V. Management of patients with atrial fibrillation. A statement for healthcare professionals from the Subcommittee on Electrocardiography and Electrophysiology, American Heart Association. Circulation. 1996;93:12621277
[Free Full Text] - Hohnloser S, Kuck KH, Lilienthal J. Rhythm or rate control in atrial fibrillation. Pharmacological Intervention in Atrial Fibrillation (PIAF): a randomized trial. Lancet. 2000;356:17891794[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
- Tuinenburg A, Van Gelder I, Van Den Berg M, Brugemann J, De Kam PJ, Crijns HJGM. Lack of prevention of heart failure by serial electrical cardioversion in patients with persistent atrial fibrillation. Heart. 1999;82:486493
[Abstract/Free Full Text] - Dries D, Exner D, Gersch B, Domanski M, Waclawiw M, Stevenson L. Atrial fibrillation is associated with an increased risk for mortality and heart failure progression in patients with asymptomatic and symptomatic left ventricular systolic dysfunction. A retrospective analysis of the SOLVD Trials. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1998;32:695703
[Abstract/Free Full Text] - Pozzoli M, Cioffi G, Traversi E, Pinna GD, Cobelli F, Tavazzi L. Predictors of primary atrial fibrillation and concomitant clinical and hemodynamic changes in patients with chronic heart failure: a prospective study in 344 patients with baseline sinus rhythm. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1998;32:197204
[Abstract/Free Full Text] - Carlsson J, Neuzner J, Rosenberg Y. Therapy of atrial fibrillation: rhythm control versus rate control. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2000;23:891903[CrossRef][Medline]
- Deedwania PC, Singh BN, Ellenbogen K, Fisher S, Fletcher R, Singh S. Spontaneous conversion and maintenance of sinus rhythm by amiodarone in patients with heart failure and atrial fibrillation. Circulation. 1998;98:25742579
[Abstract/Free Full Text] - Carson PE, Jonhson G, Dunkman W, Fletcher R, Farrell L, Cohn J. The influence of atrial fibrillation on prognosis in mild to moderate heart failure. The V-HeFT studies. The V-HeFT VA Cooperative Studies Group. Circulation. 1993;87:102110
- Marshall H, Harris Z, Griffith M, Holder R, Gammage M. Prospective randomized study of ablation and pacing versus medical therapy for paroxysmal atrial fibrillation. Effects of pacing mode and mode-switch algorithm. Circulation. 1999;99:15871592
[Abstract/Free Full Text] - Gasparini M, Mantica M, Brignole M. Thromboembolism after atrioventricular node ablation and pacing: long-term follow-up. Heart. 1999;82:494498
[Abstract/Free Full Text] - Wood M, Brown-Mahoney C, Kay GN, Ellenbogen K. Clinical outcomes after ablation and pacing therapy for atrial fibrillation. Circulation. 2000;101:11381144
[Abstract/Free Full Text] - Ozcan C, Jahangir A, Friedman P. Long-term survival after ablation of the atrioventricular node and implantation of a permanent pacemaker in patients with atrial fibrillation. N Engl J Med. 2001;344:10431051
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
D. Roy, M. Talajic, S. Nattel, D. G. Wyse, P. Dorian, K. L. Lee, M. G. Bourassa, J. M. O. Arnold, A. E. Buxton, A. J. Camm, et al. Rhythm Control versus Rate Control for Atrial Fibrillation and Heart Failure N. Engl. J. Med., June 19, 2008; 358(25): 2667 - 2677. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. R. Betts Atrioventricular junction ablation and pacemaker implant for atrial fibrillation: still a valid treatment in appropriately selected patients Europace, April 1, 2008; 10(4): 425 - 432. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. Kirchhof, A. Auricchio, J. Bax, H. Crijns, J. Camm, H.-C. Diener, A. Goette, G. Hindricks, S. Hohnloser, L. Kappenberger, et al. Outcome parameters for trials in atrial fibrillation: executive summary: Recommendations from a consensus conference organized by the German Atrial Fibrillation Competence NETwork (AFNET) and the European Heart Rhythm Association (EHRA) Eur. Heart J., November 2, 2007; 28(22): 2803 - 2817. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. Kirchhof, A. Auricchio, J. Bax, H. Crijns, J. Camm, H.-C. Diener, A. Goette, G. Hindricks, S. Hohnloser, L. Kappenberger, et al. Outcome parameters for trials in atrial fibrillation: Recommendations from a consensus conference organized by the German Atrial Fibrillation Competence NETwork and the European Heart Rhythm Association Europace, November 1, 2007; 9(11): 1006 - 1023. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Brignole A novel use of cardiac pacing to improve cardiac function, quality of life and (hopefully) survival in patients with heart failure and permanent atrial fibrillation Eur. Heart J., November 2, 2002; 23(22): 1732 - 1736. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S.R. Raj and D.G. Wyse Rhythm control for paroxysmal atrial fibrillation after AV junction ablation: is it worth the effort? Eur. Heart J., June 1, 2002; 23(11): 845 - 848. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||


