Copyright © 2002 by the European Society of Cardiology.
Letters to the Editor
A better control for ICD patients?
Bakersfield Heart Hospital and Central Cardiology Medical Clinic, Bakersfield, CA, 93301, USA
References
- Nisam S, Farre J. Is prophylaxis the best use of the ICD? Eur Heart J. 2002;23:700705
[Free Full Text] - Moss AJ, Zareba W, Jackson W, Hall WJ. Prophylactic implantation of a defibrillator in patients with myocardial infarction and reduced ejection fraction. N Engl J Med. 2002;346:877883
[Abstract/Free Full Text] - Moss AJ, Hall WJ, Cannom DS. Improved survival with an implanted defibrillator in patients with coronary disease at high risk for ventricular arrhythmia. N Engl J Med. 1996;335:19331940
[Abstract/Free Full Text] - Boutitie F, Boissel JP, Connolly SJ. Amiodarone interaction with beta-blockers: analysis of the merged EMIAT and CAMIAT databases. Circulation. 1999;99:22682275
[Abstract/Free Full Text] - Bigger JT. Prophylactic use of implantable cardiac defibrillators in patients at high risk for ventricular arrhythmias after coronary artery bypass graft surgery. N Engl J Med. 1997;337:15691575
[Abstract/Free Full Text] - Zivin A, Bardy GH. Implantable defibrillators and antiarrhythmic drugs in patients at risk for lethal arrhythmias. Am J Cardiol. 1999;84:63R68R[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
J. Farre and S. Nisam Response to the letter to the editor (Sharma et al.) Eur. Heart J., May 1, 2003; 24(9): 880 - 881. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
