Skip Navigation

European Heart Journal 2002 23(6):490-497; doi:10.1053/euhj.2001.2817
Copyright © 2002 by the European Society of Cardiology.
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow E-letters: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when E-letters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (9)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Höijer, C.J
Right arrow Articles by Boström, P.-A
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Höijer, C.J
Right arrow Articles by Boström, P.-A
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Improved cardiac function and quality of life following upgrade to dual chamber pacing after long-term ventricular stimulation

C.J Höijera,f1, J Brandta, R Willenheimerb, S Juul-Möllerb and P.-Å Boströmb

a Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Lund University Hospital, Lund, Sweden
b Department of Cardiology, Malmö University Hospital, Malmö, Sweden

revised June 5, 2001; accepted June 6, 2001

Abstract

Aims Many patients with sinus node disease or atrioventricular block have previously received pacemakers with only ventricular stimulation (VVI or VVIR). This study aimed to investigate whether quality of life and cardiac function were affected by an upgrade to dual chamber pacing (DDDR or DDIR) following long-term ventricular stimulation.

Methods After implantation of an atrial lead and a DDDR pulse generator, a randomized, double-blind crossover study was performed in 19 patients, previously treated with ventricular pacing for a median time of 6·8 years. Patients were randomized to 8 weeks with either VVIR or DDDR/DDIR pacing; after this time, the other mode was programmed for 8 weeks. At the end of each period, the patients' quality of life was evaluated and echocardiography was performed together with Holter monitoring and blood samples for brain natriuretic peptide.

Results Sixteen of the patients preferred DDDR and two VVIR pacing (P=0·001); one was undecided. Seven patients demanded an early crossover while paced in the VVIR mode, vs none in the DDDR mode (P=0·008). Quality of life was higher in the DDDR mode in 11 of 17 modalities, reaching statistical significance for dyspnoea (P<0·05) and general activity (P<0·05). Echocardiography showed significantly larger left ventricular end-diastolic dimensions in the DDDR mode (P=0·01), whereas end-systolic dimensions did not differ. Left ventricular systolic function was significantly superior in the DDDR mode (mean aortic velocity–time integral: P<0·001) and left atrial diameter was significantly smaller in the DDDR mode (P=0·01). The plasma level of brain natriuretic peptide was significantly lower in DDDR mode (P=0·002).

Conclusion An upgrade to dual chamber rate adaptive pacing results in significantly improved quality of life and cardiac function as compared to continued VVIR stimulation and should thus be considered in patients with ventricular pacemakers who have not developed permanent atrial fibrillation or flutter.

Key Words: Dual-chamber pacing, quality of life, upgrade, cardiac function

f1 Correspondence: Carl J. Höijer, MD, Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Lund University Hospital, S-221 85 Lund, Sweden.

References

  1. Dreifus LS, Fisch C, Griffin JC, Gillette PC, Mason JW, Parsonnet V. Guidelines for implantation of cardiac pacemakers and antiarrhythmia devices. A report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on assessment of diagnostic and therapeutic cardiovascular procedures (Committee on pacemaker implantation). J Am Coll Cardiol. 1991;18:1–13[Web of Science][Medline]
  2. Clarke M, Sutton R, Ward D. Recommendations for pacemaker prescription for symptomatic bradycardia. Report of a working party of the British pacing and electrophysiology group. Br Heart J. 1991;66:185–191[Free Full Text]
  3. Rosenqvist M, Brandt J, Schüller H. Long-term pacing in sinus node disease: Effects of stimulation mode on cardiovascular morbidity and mortality. Am Heart J. 1988;116:16–22[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
  4. Santini M, Alexidou G, Ansalone G, Caccaiatore G, Cini R, Turitto G. Relation of prognosis in sick sinus syndrome to age, conduction defects and modes of permanent cardiac pacing. Am J Cardiol. 1990;65:729–735[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
  5. Andersen HR, Nielsen JC, Thomsen PE. Long-term follow-up of patients from a randomized trial of atrial versus ventricular pacing for sick sinus syndrome. Lancet. 1997;350:1210–1216[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
  6. Alpert MA, Curtis JJ, Sanfelippo JF. Comparative survival after permanent ventricular and dual chamber pacing for patients with chronic high degree atrioventricular block with or without preexistent congestive heart failure. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1986;7:925–932[Abstract]
  7. Linde-Edelstam C, Gullberg B, Nordlander R, Pehrsson SK, Rosenquist M, Rydén L. Longevity in patients with high degree atrioventricular block paced in the atrial synchronous or the fixed rate ventricular mode. PACE. 1992;15:304–313
  8. Nielsen JC, Andersen HR, Bloch Thomsen PE. Heart failure and echocardiographic changes during long-term follow-up of patients with sick sinus syndrome randomized to single chamber atrial or ventricular pacing. Circulation. 1998;97:987–995[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  9. Lamas GA, Orav EJ, Stambler BS. Quality of life and clinical outcomes in elderly patients treated with ventricular pacing as compared with dual chamber pacing. N Engl J Med. 1998;338:1097–1104[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  10. Lau W, Paquette M, Irvine J. Quality of life improves after pacing in the Canadian Trial of Physiologic Pacing (CTOPP), Independent of pacing mode (Abstr). PACE. 1999;22:905
  11. Hildick-Smith DJR, Lowe MD, Newell SA. Ventricular pacemaker upgrade: experience, complications and recommendations. Heart. 1998;79:383–387[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  12. Brandt J, Höijer CJ, Wierup P, Juul-Möller S, Boström P. Upgrade to dual chamber pacing after long-term ventricular stimulation; Feasibility and intermediate term follow-up. Europace. 1999;1:168–173[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  13. Linde-Edelstam C, Nordlander R, Unden A-L, Orth-Gomer K, Rydén L. Quality-of-life in patients treated with atrioventricular synchronous pacing compared to rate modulated ventricular pacing: A long-term, double-blind, crossover study. PACE. 1992;15:1467–1476
  14. Linde C. How to evaluate quality-of-life in pacemaker patients: Problems and pitfalls. PACE. 1996;19:391–397
  15. Willenheimer R, Cline C, Erhardt L, Israelsson B. Left ventricular atrioventricular plane displacement: An echocardiographic technique for rapid assessment of prognosis in heart failure. Heart. 1997;78:230–236[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  16. Schiller NB, Shah PM, Crawford M. Recommendations for quantitation of the left ventricle by two-dimensional echocardiography. American Society of Echocardiography Committee on Standards, Subcommittee on Quantitation of Two-dimensional Echocardiograms. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 1989;3:358–367
  17. Grantham JA, Borgeson DD, Burnett JC. BNP: Pathophysiological and potential therapeutic roles in acute congestive heart failure. Am J Physiol. 1997;272:R1077–1083
  18. Throughton RW, Frampton CM, Yandle TG, Espiner EA, Nicholls MG, Richards AM. Treatment of heart failure guided by plasma aminterminal brain natriuretic peptide (N-BNP) concentrations. Lancet. 2000;355:1126–1130[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
  19. Sulke N, Dritsas A, Bostock J. ‘Subclinical’ pacemaker syndrome: a randomised study of symptom free patients with ventricular demand (VVI) pacemakers upgraded to dual chamber devices. Br Heart J. 1992;67:57–64[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  20. Toff WD, Skehan JD, De Bono DP, Camm AJ. The United Kingdom pacing and cardiovascular events (UKPACE) trial. Heart. 1997;78:221–223[Free Full Text]
  21. Kuo LC, Quinones MA, Rokey R, Sartori M, Abinander EG, Zoghbi WA. Quantification of atrial contribution to left ventricular filling by pulsed Doppler echocardiography and the effect of age in normal and diseased hearts. Am J Cardiol. 1987;59:1174–1178[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
  22. Bonow RO, Vitale DF, Bacharach SL, Maron BJ, Green MV. Effects on aging on asynchronous left ventricular regional function and global ventricular filling in normal subjects. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1988;11:50–58[Abstract]
  23. Miller TR, Grossman SJ, Schectman KB, Biello DR, Ludbrook PA. Left ventricular filling and its association with age. Am J Cardiol. 1986;58:531–535[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
  24. Leclerq C, Gras D, Le Helloco A, Nicol L, Mabo P, Daubert C. Hemodynamic importance of preserving the normal sequence of ventricular activation in permanent cardiac pacing. Am Heart J. 1995;129:1133–1141[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
  25. Stojnic BB, Stojanov PL, Angelkov L, Pavlovic SU, Radjen GS, Velimirovic DB. Evaluation of asynchronous left ventricular relaxation by Doppler echocardiography during ventricular pacing with AV-synchrony (VDD): comparison with atrial pacing (AAI). PACE. 1996;19:940–944

Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Eur J EchocardiogrHome page
M.C. Vonk, M.H. Sander, F.H.J. van den Hoogen, P.L.C.M. van Riel, F.W.A. Verheugt, and A.P.J. van Dijk
Right ventricle Tei-index: A tool to increase the accuracy of non-invasive detection of pulmonary arterial hypertension in connective tissue diseases
Eur J Echocardiogr, October 1, 2007; 8(5): 317 - 321.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Coll CardiolHome page
M. H. Schoenfeld
Alternative Site Pacing to Promote Cardiac Synchrony: Has Conventional Pacing Become Unconventional?
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., May 16, 2006; 47(10): 1946 - 1948.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur Heart JHome page
N. Musilli and L. Padeletti
Pacemaker selection: time for a rethinking of complex pacing systems?
Eur. Heart J., January 2, 2006; 27(2): 132 - 135.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur Heart JHome page
J.C. Daubert and C. Leclercq
Upgrading from ventricular to physiological pacing: is it worth it?
Eur. Heart J., March 2, 2002; 23(6): 437 - 441.
[Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow E-letters: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when E-letters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (9)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Höijer, C.J
Right arrow Articles by Boström, P.-A
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Höijer, C.J
Right arrow Articles by Boström, P.-A
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?