Copyright © 1996 by the European Society of Cardiology.
© 1996 The European Society of Cardiology
Arm–leg pressure gradients on late follow-up after coarctation repair
Possible causes and implications
Departments of Cardiology and Endocrinology, University Children's Hospital of Basel Basel, Switzerland
revised 17 October 1995; accepted 13 November 1995.
Joëlle Guenthard, MD, Römergasse 8, CH-4005 Basel, Switzerland.
Abstract
Seventeen years after coarctation repair, 36 patients were studied by magnetic resonance imaging and exercise testing to measure residual anatomical stenosis and hormonal response to exercise, and to evaluate their effect on arm–leg gradients and on exercise hypertension. The systolic arm pressure, leg pressure and arm–leg gradient were measured at rest and during exercise. Active renin and catecholamines were measured in the plasma at rest and after peak exercise. On magnetic resonance imaging 18 patients had residual stenosis of less than 30% (group I) and 18 had residual stenosis of equal to or more than 30% (group II). At peak exercise, the arm pressure was 235 (133–296) mmHg in group I and 241 (157–286) mmHg in group II (ns), the leg pressure was 138 (111–173) mmHg in group I and 114 (75–154)mmHg in group II (P=0·002). The adrenalin increase from rest to exercise was 32·7 ± 9·1 pg . ml –1 in the patients with exercise hypertension and 3·1 ± 4·7 pg. ml–1 in the patients who remained normotensive during exercise (P=0·02). In conclusion, residual anatomical stenosis leads to a pressure drop in the legs, which influences the arm-leg gradient. Arm hypertension is not related to anatomical narrowing but to interaction of enhanced sympathetic nerve activity and structural and functional abnormality of the precoarctation vessels.
(Eur Heart J 1996; 17: 1572–1575)
Key Words: Coarctation repair • arm–leg • gradients • residual anatomical stenois • sympathetic nerve activity
CiteULike 
Connotea 
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  H. Senzaki, Y. Iwamoto, H. Ishido, S. Masutani, M. Taketazu, T. Kobayashi, T. Katogi, and S. Kyo Ventricular-Vascular Stiffening in Patients With Repaired Coarctation of Aorta: Integrated Pathophysiology of Hypertension Circulation, September 30, 2008; 118(14_suppl_1): S191 - S198. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 D Boshoff, W Budts, L Mertens, B Eyskens, T Delhaas, B Meyns, W Daenen, and M Gewillig Stenting of hypoplastic aortic segments with mild pressure gradients and arterial hypertension Heart, November 1, 2006; 92(11): 1661 - 1666. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 T. Murakami and A. Takeda Enhanced Aortic Pressure Wave Reflection in Patients After Repair of Aortic Coarctation Ann. Thorac. Surg., September 1, 2005; 80(3): 995 - 999. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
C. G. Cowley, G. S. Orsmond, P. Feola, L. McQuillan, and R. E. Shaddy Long-Term, Randomized Comparison of Balloon Angioplasty and Surgery for Native Coarctation of the Aorta in Childhood Circulation, June 28, 2005; 111(25): 3453 - 3456. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 J. W.J. Vriend, A. H. Zwinderman, E. de Groot, J. J.P. Kastelein, B. J. Bouma, and B. J.M. Mulder Predictive value of mild, residual descending aortic narrowing for blood pressure and vascular damage in patients after repair of aortic coarctation Eur. Heart J., January 1, 2005; 26(1): 84 - 90. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
M Hauser Exercise blood pressure in congenital heart disease and in patients after coarctation repair Heart, February 1, 2003; 89(2): 125 - 126. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 J. Therrien, S. A. Thorne, A. Wright, P. J. Kilner, and J. Somerville Repaired coarctation: a "cost-effective" approach to identify complications in adults J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., March 15, 2000; 35(4): 997 - 1002. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|