Skip Navigation

European Heart Journal 1999 20(16):1175-1181; doi:10.1053/euhj.1998.1476
Copyright © 1999 by the European Society of Cardiology.
This Article
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow References
Right arrow E-letters: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when E-letters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (2)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Schofer, J.
Right arrow Articles by Mathey, D.G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Schofer, J.
Right arrow Articles by Mathey, D.G.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Restenosis after stenting of matched occluded and non-occluded coronary arteries. Should there be a difference?

J. Schofera,f1, T. Raua, M. Schlütera and D.G. Matheya

a Center for Cardiology, Othmarschen, Hamburg, Germany

1999, 1999

Abstract

Aims It is not known whether the higher restenosis rates reported after balloon angioplasty of occluded as opposed to non-occluded coronary arteries are still found after placement of coronary stents in lesions matched for factors known to affect late angiographic outcome

Methods and Results In a retrospective analysis of 1276 patients who had undergone coronary stent placement and in whom 6-month angiographic follow-up was available, we identified 144 patients with a total coronary occlusion which matched a non-occluded coronary lesion in another 144 patients. Matching lesion pairs were of the same type (de novo or restenotic), were supplied with the same type of stent, had reference vessel diameters identical within 0·3mm and stented vessel segment lengths identical within 8mm, and were located in corresponding target vessels. After stenting, statistically identical minimal lumen diameters had been achieved in both groups (occluded: 2·74±0·35mm, non-occluded: 2·77±0·32mm,P =0·45). At follow-up, minimal lumen diameters were not different (occluded: 1·65±0·77mm, non-occluded: 1·76±0·76mm,P =0·24), reflecting an identical late lumen loss for occlusions (1·09±0·76mm) and non-occluded lesions (1·01±0·70mm,P =0·38). Because of the significantly larger acute gain, the loss index was significantly lower for occluded vessels (0·40±0·27 vs 0·51±0·35,P =0·003). Corresponding restenosis rates were 33% (occluded) and 28% (non-occluded;P=0·44). For stented vessel segment lengths >18mm, restenosis rates were markedly higher (occluded: 42%, non-occluded: 36%) than for stented vessel segment lengths ≤18mm (occluded: 25%, non-occluded: 22%).

Conclusions In occluded and non-occluded coronary lesions matched for factors known to affect the angiographic outcome, no difference between the respective restenosis rates was observed within 6 months of coronary stenting. Thus, either type of coronary lesion appears to exhibit the same propensity for neointimal hyperplasia.

Key Words: Stents, occlusions, coronary disease, restenosis, angiography

f1 Correspondence: Prof Dr Joachim Schofer, Othmarscher Kirchenweg 168, 22763 Hamburg, Germany.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Eur Heart JHome page
B. Meier
The stent, the Procrustes for chronic total coronary occlusions?
Eur. Heart J., August 2, 1999; 20(16): 1142 - 1144.
[PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.