Skip Navigation

European Heart Journal 1999 20(24):1826-1832; doi:10.1053/euhj.1999.1749
Copyright © 1999 by the European Society of Cardiology.
This Article
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow References
Right arrow E-letters: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when E-letters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (11)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Dagres, N.
Right arrow Articles by Borggrefe, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Dagres, N.
Right arrow Articles by Borggrefe, M.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Radiofrequency catheter ablation of accessory pathways. Outcome and use of antiarrhythmic drugs during follow-up

N. Dagresf1, f3, J.R. Claguef2, H. Kottkamp, G. Hindricks, G. Breithardt and M. Borggrefe

The Department of Cardiology and Angiology, Hospital of the Westfälische Wilhelms-University and Institute for Arteriosclerosis Research, Münster, Germany

revised May 28, 1999; accepted June 2, 1999

Abstract

Aims The purpose of this study was to assess the acute and long-term success of accessory pathway ablation in a single large-volume centre, concentrating on long-term recurrences and the clinical use of antiarrhythmic drugs.

Methods and Results A total of 519 consecutive patients (mean age 40±14 years) underwent radiofrequency ablation of manifest or concealed accessory pathways. The patients were seen in the hospital or by the referring physician at 6 and 12 months. Long-term follow-up information was obtained by questionnaire. Pathway conduction was abolished in 476 cases (91·7%). ‘Redo’ procedures, due to recurrence, were performed in 38 patients (7·3%) and were successful in 30 (78·9%). Follow-up data were obtained from 454 patients (87·5%) with a follow-up duration of 22·6±12·4 months. Among the 398 patients with successful ablations who responded to the questionnaire, 340 (85·4%) were asymptomatic with only 10·6% taking antiarrhythmic drugs. An additional 20 patients (5·0%) had symptoms suspicious of recurrence. In total, 66 out of 398 successfully treated patients (16·6%) were taking antiarrhythmic drugs. Twenty-three out of 56 (41·1%) patients with failed ablations were asymptomatic, 12 of whom (21·4% of patients with failed ablations) had not been administered antiarrhythmic drugs. In the total group of 454 patients with ablation attempts and available follow-up data, 99 (21·8%) were still taking antiarrhythmic drugs during follow-up.

Conclusions Patients with successful ablation of accessory pathways show excellent long-term results. However, 17% of successfully treated patients were still taking antiarrhythmic drugs during the period of long-term follow-up. On the other hand, 21% of patients with failed ablations were symptom-free without antiarrhythmic drugs. On an intention-to-treat basis, 22% of the patients with ablation attempts were still taking antiarrhythmic drugs during follow-up.

Key Words: Accessory pathway, radiofrequency current, catheter ablation

f1 Present address: Department of Cardiology, University of Essen, Germany.

f3 Correspondence: Dr Nikolaos Dagres, Abteilung fuer Kardiologie, Medizinische Klinik, Universitaetsklinikum Essen, Hufelandstr. 55, 45122 Essen, Germany. Tel: +49/201/7232339, fax: +49/201/7235951.

f2 Present address: Royal Brompton Hospital, London, U.K.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Card Surg AdultHome page
R. E. Eckart and L. M. Epstein
Interventional Therapy for Atrial and Ventricular Arrhythmias
Card. Surg. Adult, January 1, 2008; 3(2008): 1357 - 1374.
[Full Text]


Home page
EuropaceHome page
N. Dagres, C. Piorkowski, H. Kottkamp, D. Th. Kremastinos, and G. Hindricks
Contemporary catheter ablation of arrhythmias in geriatric patients: patient characteristics, distribution of arrhythmias, and outcome
Europace, July 1, 2007; 9(7): 477 - 480.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
HeartHome page
F G Cosio
Should ablation be the first line treatment for supraventricular arrhythmias?
Heart, January 1, 2005; 91(1): 5 - 6.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Coll CardiolHome page
N. Dagres, J. R. Clague, G. Breithardt, and M. Borggrefe
Significant gender-related differences in radiofrequency catheter ablation therapy
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., September 17, 2003; 42(6): 1103 - 1107.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Card Surg AdultHome page
S. D. Satti and L. M. Epstein
Cardiologic Interventional Therapy for Atrial and Ventricular Arrhythmias
Card. Surg. Adult, January 1, 2003; 2(2003): 1253 - 1270.
[Full Text]


Home page
Eur Heart JHome page
J Schlapfer and M Fromer
Late clinical outcome after successful radiofrequency catheter ablation of accessory pathways
Eur. Heart J., April 1, 2001; 22(7): 605 - 609.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Eur Heart JHome page
N Dagres, J.R Clague, H Lottkamp, G Hindricks, G Breithardt, and M Borggrefe
Impact of radiofrequency catheter ablation of accessory pathways on the frequency of atrial fibrillation during long-term follow-up; High recurrence rate of atrial fibrillation in patients older than 50 years of age
Eur. Heart J., March 1, 2001; 22(5): 423 - 427.
[Abstract] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.