Copyright © 1999 by the European Society of Cardiology.
Sulfonylureas and ischaemic preconditioning; a double-blind, placebo-controlled evaluation of glimepiride and glibenclamide
a Department of Medicine, Division of Cardiology, J. W. Goethe University, Frankfurt/Main, Germany
b Department of Cardiology, Klinik Nordrhein, Bad Nauheim, Germany
c Division of Cardiology, University Hospital, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
d Division of Biometry, Farmovs Research Centre for Clinical Pharmacology and Drug Development, University of the Orange Free State, Bloemfontein, South Africa
revised July 3, 1998; accepted July 12, 1998
Abstract
Aims
Glimepiride is a new sulfonylurea for diabetes treatment which is supposed to impact less on extra-pancreatic ATP-dependent K+channels than the conventional drug glibenclamide. This study was performed to evaluate whether this results in a better maintenance of ATP-dependent K+channel mediated ischaemic myocardial preconditioning.
Methods and Results
In a double-blind placebo-controlled study the period of total coronary occlusion during balloon angioplasty of high grade coronary artery stenoses was used as a model to compare the effects of both drugs. Quantification of myocardial ischaemia was achieved by recording the intracoronary ECG and the time to the occurrence of angina during vessel occlusion. All patients underwent three dilatations. The first dilatation (dilatation 1) served to determine the severity of ischaemia during vessel occlusion. During dilatation 2, baseline values were recorded. Thereafter, glimepiride (15 patients: 1·162mg), glibenclamide (15 patients: 2·54mg) or placebo (15 patients) were intravenously administered over 12min. Dilatation 3 started 10min after the beginning of the drug administration.
Mean ST segment shifts in the placebo group decreased by 35% (dilatation 2: 0·23; dilatation 3: 0·15mV; CI 0·55 to 0·00mV;P=0·049). A similar reduction also occurred in the glimepiride group, in which repetitive balloon occlusion led to a 34% reduction (dilatation 2: 0·35; dilatation 3: 0·23mV; CI 0·21 to 0·02mV;P=0·01). There was little influence however, on mean ST segment shifts in the glibenclamide group (dilatation 2 and dilatation 3: 0·24mV; CI 0·10 to 0·25mV;P=0·34). Accordingly, time to angina during balloon occlusion slightly increased (by 30%) in the placebo group (dilatation 2: 37s; dilatation 3: 48s; CI 0·0 to 15·0s;P=0·16); increased by 13% in the glimepiride group (dilatation 2: 40s; dilatation 3: 45s; CI 0·0 to 14·0s;P=0·023); and remained unchanged in the glibenclamide group (dilatation 2 and dilatation 3: 30s; CI 7·5 to 7·5s;P=0·67).
Conclusion
These results show that glimepiride maintains myocardial preconditioning, while glibenclamide might be able to prevent it.
Key Words: Glimepiride, glibenclamide, ischaemic preconditioning, percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty
f1 Correspondence: Prof. Dr Harald Klepzig, J. W. Goethe University, Department of Medicine, Division of Cardiology, Theodor Stern Kai 7, D-60590 Frankfurt/Main, Germany.
![]()
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
J. N. Peart and J. P. Headrick Clinical cardioprotection and the value of conditioning responses Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, June 1, 2009; 296(6): H1705 - H1720. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
F. A. McAlister, D. T. Eurich, S. R. Majumdar, and J. A. Johnson The risk of heart failure in patients with type 2 diabetes treated with oral agent monotherapy Eur J Heart Fail, July 1, 2008; 10(7): 703 - 708. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. W. Elrod, M. Harrell, T. P. Flagg, S. Gundewar, M. A. Magnuson, C. G. Nichols, W. A. Coetzee, and D. J. Lefer Role of Sulfonylurea Receptor Type 1 Subunits of ATP-Sensitive Potassium Channels in Myocardial Ischemia/Reperfusion Injury Circulation, March 18, 2008; 117(11): 1405 - 1413. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. S. Gangji, T. Cukierman, H. C. Gerstein, C. H. Goldsmith, and C. M. Clase A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Hypoglycemia and Cardiovascular Events: A comparison of glyburide with other secretagogues and with insulin Diabetes Care, February 1, 2007; 30(2): 389 - 394. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. Valensi and G. Slama Review: Sulphonylureas and cardiovascular risk: facts and controversies The British Journal of Diabetes & Vascular Disease, July 1, 2006; 6(4): 159 - 165. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Z. T. Bloomgarden Cardiovascular Disease Diabetes Care, May 1, 2006; 29(5): 1160 - 1166. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. J. Edwards, S. R. Redwood, P. D. Lambiase, and M. S. Marber The effect of an angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor and a K+ATP channel opener on warm up angina Eur. Heart J., March 2, 2005; 26(6): 598 - 606. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
U. Quast, D. Stephan, S. Bieger, and U. Russ The Impact of ATP-Sensitive K+ Channel Subtype Selectivity of Insulin Secretagogues for the Coronary Vasculature and the Myocardium Diabetes, December 1, 2004; 53(suppl_3): S156 - S164. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Clement, S. S. Braithwaite, M. F. Magee, A. Ahmann, E. P. Smith, R. G. Schafer, and I. B. Hirsch Management of Diabetes and Hyperglycemia in Hospitals Diabetes Care, February 1, 2004; 27(2): 553 - 591. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J J Meier, B Gallwitz, W E Schmidt, A Mugge, and M A Nauck Is impairment of ischaemic preconditioning by sulfonylurea drugs clinically important? Heart, January 1, 2004; 90(1): 9 - 12. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Zaugg, E. Lucchinetti, C. Garcia, T. Pasch, D. R. Spahn, and M. C. Schaub Anaesthetics and cardiac preconditioning. Part II. Clinical implications Br. J. Anaesth., October 1, 2003; 91(4): 566 - 576. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. F. Huizar, L. A. Gonzalez, J. Alderman, and H. S. Smith Sulfonylureas attenuate electrocardiographic ST-segment elevation during an acute myocardial infarction in diabetics J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., September 17, 2003; 42(6): 1017 - 1021. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
O. Torffvit Hyperglycaemia in diabetes: impact on nephropathy and cardiac risk Nephrol. Dial. Transplant., September 1, 2003; 18(9): 1711 - 1715. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
N. Lavanchy, G. Christe, F. Cand, N. Wiernsperger, and J. Verdetti Effects of chronic treatment with glibenclamide and/or metformin on the resistance to ischaemia of isolated hearts from Zucker Diabetic Fatty rats (ZDF/GMI-fa/fa) The British Journal of Diabetes & Vascular Disease, September 1, 2003; 3(5): 375 - 380. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. C. Riddle Sulfonylureas Differ in Effects on Ischemic Preconditioning--Is it Time to Retire Glyburide? J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., February 1, 2003; 88(2): 528 - 530. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T.-M. Lee and T.-F. Chou Impairment of Myocardial Protection in Type 2 Diabetic Patients J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., February 1, 2003; 88(2): 531 - 537. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. T. Caulfield and K. D. O'Brien Cardiovascular Safety of Oral Antidiabetic Agents: The Insulin Secretagogues Clin. Diabetes, April 1, 2002; 20(2): 81 - 84. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T Reffelmann, H G Klues, P Hanrath, and E R Schwarz Post-stenotic coronary blood flow at rest is not altered by therapeutic doses of the oral antidiabetic drug glibenclamide in patients with coronary artery disease Heart, January 1, 2002; 87(1): 54 - 60. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Z S Kyriakides, S Psychari, N Chrysomallis, M Georgiadis, E Sbarouni, and D T Kremastinos Type II diabetes does not prevent the recruitment of collateral vessels and the normal reduction of myocardial ischaemia on repeated balloon inflations during angioplasty Heart, January 1, 2002; 87(1): 61 - 66. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. M. Mocanu, H. L. Maddock, G. F. Baxter, C. L. Lawrence, N. B. Standen, and D. M. Yellon Glimepiride, a Novel Sulfonylurea, Does Not Abolish Myocardial Protection Afforded by Either Ischemic Preconditioning or Diazoxide Circulation, June 26, 2001; 103(25): 3111 - 3116. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. Spallarossa, M. Schiavo, P. Rossettin, S. Cordone, L. Olivotti, R. Cordera, and C. Brunelli Sulfonylurea Treatment of Type 2 Diabetic Patients Does Not Reduce the Vasodilator Response to Ischemia Diabetes Care, April 1, 2001; 24(4): 738 - 742. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
G. R. McAnulty, H. J. Robertshaw, and G. M. Hall Anaesthetic management of patients with diabetes mellitus Br. J. Anaesth., July 1, 2000; 85(1): 80 - 90. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D.J. Betteridge and L. Close Diabetes, coronary heart disease and sulphonylureas--not the final word Eur. Heart J., May 2, 2000; 21(10): 790 - 792. [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Ghosh, N. B Standen, and M. Galinanes Evidence for mitochondrial KATP channels as effectors of human myocardial preconditioning Cardiovasc Res, March 1, 2000; 45(4): 934 - 940. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||













