Skip Navigation

European Heart Journal 2000 21(10):814-822; doi:10.1053/euhj.1999.1942
Copyright © 2000 by the European Society of Cardiology.
This Article
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow References
Right arrow E-letters: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when E-letters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (6)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Mezilis, N.E.
Right arrow Articles by Vardas, P.E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Mezilis, N.E.
Right arrow Articles by Vardas, P.E.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Dobutamine- vs exercise-induced ST segment elevation early after Q wave myocardial infarction. Prediction of functional recovery after revascularization

N.E. Mezilis, F.I. Parthenakis, M.K. Kanakaraki, M.E. Marketou, H.E. Mavrakis and P.E. Vardas

Cardiology Department, University Hospital of Heraklion, Crete, Greece

revised September 13, 1999; accepted September 15, 1999

Abstract

Aims The association between stress-induced ST elevation and functional recovery following revascularization after myocardial infarction remains unclear. We assessed the relative accuracy of dobutamine- and exercise-induced ST elevation in Q wave leads in predicting functional recovery following revascularization, and we investigated the relationship of ST elevation to different wall motion responses to dobutamine.

Methods and Results Thirty-nine patients underwent dobutamine stress echo and exercise test 8±2 days after Q wave myocardial infarction. All patients underwent angiography and subsequent revascularization. Follow-up echocardiograms were obtained 7±4 weeks after revascularization. Functional recovery was assessed by the difference between the baseline and the follow-up asynergy index. Nineteen patients (48%) developed dobutamine- and exercise-induced ST elevation. There was significant agreement between the tests (k=0·58, P<0·001). We found a significant correlation between dobutamine and exercise-induced ST elevation with functional recovery following revascularization (r=0·45,P <0·005 and r=0·7, P<0·001, respectively). The parameters with the highest predictive value for functional recovery were: (a) the biphasic response during dobutamine infusion, (b) the development of ST elevation in both tests, and (c) the development of exercise-induced ST elevation in more than three leads.

Conclusion There is a strong association between dobutamine- and exercise-induced ST elevation with functional recovery following revascularization. Exercise-induced ST elevation in more than three leads and a biphasic response during dobutamine infusion accurately predict functional recovery.

Key Words: Acute myocardial infarction, dobutamine stress echo, exercise treadmill test, ST segment elevation

Correspondence: Prof. P. E. Vardas, MD, PhD (London), FESC, FACC, Cardiology Department, Heraklion University Hospital, P.O. Box 1352 Stavrakia, Heraklion, Crete, Greece.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Eur Heart JHome page
V. Bodi, J. Sanchis, and A. Llacer
Stress-induced ST-segment elevation on Q leads after myocardial infarction
Eur. Heart J., January 2, 2001; 22(2): 182 - 183.
[PDF]


Home page
Eur Heart JHome page
A. Elhendy, B.K. Khandheria, and J.B. Seward
The unresolved mystery of stress-induced ST segment elevation after myocardial infarcation
Eur. Heart J., May 2, 2000; 21(10): 787 - 789.
[PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.