Skip Navigation

European Heart Journal 2000 21(23):1954-1959; doi:10.1053/euhj.2000.2397
Copyright © 2000 by the European Society of Cardiology.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (26)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Michalis, L.K.
Right arrow Articles by Sideris, D.A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Michalis, L.K.
Right arrow Articles by Sideris, D.A.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Treatment of Refractory Unstable angina in geographically isolated areas without Cardiac Surgery. Invasive versus conservative strategy (TRUCS Study)

L.K. Michalis, C.S. Stroumbis, K. Pappas, E. Sourla, D. Niokou, J.A. Goudevenos, C. Siogas and D.A. Sideris

University of Ioannina, School of Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Cardiology, University Campus, Ioannina, Greece

revised July 21, 2000; accepted July 26, 2000

Abstract

Aims We compared invasive (on-site coronary angioplasty or emergency air-ambulance transfer for bypass grafting surgery) vs conservative (persistent medical treatment) strategies in the management of refractory unstable angina in geographically isolated hospitals without cardiac surgical facilities.

Methods and Results One hundred and forty eight randomized patients with refractory unstable angina were compared on an intention-to-treat basis. Outcomes (invasive vs conservative): (a) in hospital: stabilization (96% vs 43%,P =0·0001), non-fatal myocardial infarction (2·6% vs 4·2%, P=ns), death (1·3% vs 8·3%, P=0·046), combined outcome (3·9% vs 12·5%, P=0·053) and hospitalization (11·4±6·3 vs 12·4±8·0 days, P=ns). (b) 30-days follow-up: non-fatal myocardial infarction (2·6% vs 4·2%, P=ns), death (2·6% vs 11·1%,P =0·030) and combined outcome (5·3% vs 15·3%, P=0·031). (c) 12 month follow-up: non-fatal myocardial infarction (3·9% vs 4·2%, P=ns), death (3·9% vs 12·5%, P=0·053), combined outcome (7·9% vs 16·7%, P=ns), re-admissions for unstable angina: (17·1% vs 23·6%,P =ns), late coronary angioplasty: (15·8% vs 11·1%, P=ns) and (d) late coronary bypass grafting: (7·9% vs 12·5%,P =ns).

Conclusion Invasive treatment of patients with refractory angina in remote areas without surgical back-up results in significant in-hospital stabilization and a reduction in major events in-hospital and at 30 days. Coronary angioplasty in stand-alone units and air-transfer of these patients seems safe.

Key Words: Refractory unstable angina, angioplasty, surgical cover, air ambulance

Correspondence: Lampros K Michalis, Associate Professor of Cardiology, University of Ioannina, School of Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Cardiology, University Campus, Ioannina GR 45110, Greece.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
JAMAHome page
M. O'Donoghue, W. E. Boden, E. Braunwald, C. P. Cannon, T. C. Clayton, R. J. de Winter, K. A. A. Fox, B. Lagerqvist, P. A. McCullough, S. A. Murphy, et al.
Early Invasive vs Conservative Treatment Strategies in Women and Men With Unstable Angina and Non-ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction: A Meta-analysis
JAMA, July 2, 2008; 300(1): 71 - 80.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ANN INTERN MEDHome page
R. Qayyum, M. R. Khalid, J. Adomaityte, S. P. Papadakos, and F. C. Messineo
Systematic Review: Comparing Routine and Selective Invasive Strategies for the Acute Coronary Syndrome
Ann Intern Med, February 5, 2008; 148(3): 186 - 196.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
K. P. Alexander, L. K. Newby, C. P. Cannon, P. W. Armstrong, W. B. Gibler, M. W. Rich, F. Van de Werf, H. D. White, W. D. Weaver, M. D. Naylor, et al.
Acute Coronary Care in the Elderly, Part I: Non-ST-Segment-Elevation Acute Coronary Syndromes: A Scientific Statement for Healthcare Professionals From the American Heart Association Council on Clinical Cardiology: In Collaboration With the Society of Geriatric Cardiology
Circulation, May 15, 2007; 115(19): 2549 - 2569.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur Heart J SupplHome page
F.-J. Neumann, A. Kastrati, and G. Schwarzer
New aspects in the treatment of acute coronary syndromes without ST-elevation: ICTUS and ISAR-COOL in perspective
Eur. Heart J. Suppl., February 1, 2007; 9(suppl_A): A4 - A10.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Coll CardiolHome page
A. A. Bavry, D. J. Kumbhani, A. N. Rassi, D. L. Bhatt, and A. T. Askari
Benefit of Early Invasive Therapy in Acute Coronary Syndromes: A Meta-Analysis of Contemporary Randomized Clinical Trials
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., October 3, 2006; 48(7): 1319 - 1325.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JAMAHome page
S. R. Mehta and S. Yusuf
Routine vs Selective Invasive Strategies in Acute Coronary Syndromes--Reply
JAMA, December 14, 2005; 294(22): 2845 - 2846.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JAMAHome page
S. R. Mehta, C. P. Cannon, K. A. A. Fox, L. Wallentin, W. E. Boden, R. Spacek, P. Widimsky, P. A. McCullough, D. Hunt, E. Braunwald, et al.
Routine vs Selective Invasive Strategies in Patients With Acute Coronary Syndromes: A Collaborative Meta-analysis of Randomized Trials
JAMA, June 15, 2005; 293(23): 2908 - 2917.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur Heart JHome page
Authors/Task Force Members, S. Silber, P. Albertsson, F. F. Aviles, P. G. Camici, A. Colombo, C. Hamm, E. Jorgensen, J. Marco, J.-E. Nordrehaug, et al.
Guidelines for Percutaneous Coronary Interventions: The Task Force for Percutaneous Coronary Interventions of the European Society of Cardiology
Eur. Heart J., April 2, 2005; 26(8): 804 - 847.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur Heart JHome page
J.P. Ottervanger, P. Armstrong, E.S. Barnathan, E. Boersma, J.S. Cooper, E.M. Ohman, S. James, L. Wallentin, M.L. Simoons, and For the GUSTO IV-ACS Investigators
Association of revascularisation with low mortality in non-ST elevation acute coronary syndrome, a report from GUSTO IV-ACS
Eur. Heart J., September 1, 2004; 25(17): 1494 - 1501.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ANN INTERN MEDHome page
R. G. Bach, C. P. Cannon, W. S. Weintraub, P. M. DiBattiste, L. A. Demopoulos, H. V. Anderson, P. T. DeLucca, E. M. Mahoney, S. A. Murphy, and E. Braunwald
The Effect of Routine, Early Invasive Management on Outcome for Elderly Patients with Non-ST-Segment Elevation Acute Coronary Syndromes
Ann Intern Med, August 3, 2004; 141(3): 186 - 195.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
HeartHome page
T A Hyde, J K French, C-K Wong, C Edwards, R M L Whitlock, and H D White
Associations between ST depression, four year mortality, and in-hospital revascularisation in unselected patients with non-ST elevation acute coronary syndromes
Heart, May 1, 2003; 89(5): 490 - 495.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Coll CardiolHome page
C. P. Cannon
Small molecule glycoprotein IIb/IIIa receptor inhibitors as upstream therapy in acute coronary syndromes: Insights from the TACTICS TIMI-18 trial
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., February 19, 2003; 41(4_Suppl_S): 43S - 48S.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
HeartHome page
H H Gray and K G Callum
Death following coronary angioplasty
Heart, March 1, 2002; 87(3): 185 - 186.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur Heart JHome page
C.R. Conti
The management of refractory angina
Eur. Heart J., December 1, 2000; 21(23): 1909 - 1910.
[PDF]



Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.