Skip Navigation

European Heart Journal 2001 22(11):972; doi:10.1053/euhj.2000.2454
Copyright © 2001 by the European Society of Cardiology.
This Article
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow E-letters: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when E-letters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (5)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Mikhaildis, D.P.
Right arrow Articles by Reynolds, T.M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Mikhaildis, D.P.
Right arrow Articles by Reynolds, T.M.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Letter to the Editors

Is a mechanical or a metabolic approach superior in the treatment of coronary disease? Results of the atorvastatin versus revascularization (AVERT) trial

D.P. Mikhaildisa, A.S. Wierzbickib and T.M. Reynoldsc

a Royal Free Hospital, London, U.K.
b St. Thomas' Hospital, London, U.K.
c Queens Hospital, Burton-on-Trent, U.K.

References

  1. Waters D. Is a mechanical or a metabolic approach superior in the treatment of coronary disease? Results of the atorvastatin versus revascularization (AVERT) trial. Eur Heart J. 2000;21:1029–1031[Free Full Text]
  2. Pitt B, Waters D, Brown WV. McCormick LS for the Atorvastatin versus Revascularization Treatment Investigators. Aggressive lipid-lowering compared with angioplasty in stable coronary artery disease. N Engl J Med. 199;341:70–76
  3. Windecker S, Maier-Rudolph W, Bonzel T. Interventional Cardiology in Europe 1995. Working group Coronary Circulation of the European Society of Cardiology. Eur Heart J. 1999;20:484–495[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  4. Lancet. 1997;350:461–468[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
  5. Bucher HC, Hengstler P, Schindler C, Guyatt GH. Percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty versus medical treatment for non-acute coronary heart disease: meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials. Br Med J. 2000;321:73–77[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?



This Article
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow E-letters: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when E-letters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (5)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Mikhaildis, D.P.
Right arrow Articles by Reynolds, T.M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Mikhaildis, D.P.
Right arrow Articles by Reynolds, T.M.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?