Skip Navigation

European Heart Journal 2002 23(7):511-514; doi:10.1053/euhj.2001.3047
Copyright © 2002 by the European Society of Cardiology.
This Article
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow E-letters: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when E-letters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Eberli, F.R.
Right arrow Articles by Meier, B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Eberli, F.R.
Right arrow Articles by Meier, B.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Editorials

Coronary bypass surgery vs coronary angioplasty: a look to the past for new insights into the future

F.R. Eberli and B. Meier

Swiss Cardiovascular Center, Bern, Switzerland

References

  1. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2000;35:1122–1129[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  2. King SB 3rd, Kosinski AS, Guyton RA, Lembo NJ, Weintraub WS. Eight-year mortality in the Emory Angioplasty versus Surgery Trial (EAST). J Am Coll Cardiol. 2000;35:1116–1121[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  3. Henderson RA, Pocock SJ, Sharp SJ. Long-term results of RITA-1 trial: clinical and cost comparisons of coronary angioplasty and coronary-artery bypass grafting. Randomised Intervention Treatment of Angina. Lancet. 1998;352:1419–1425[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
  4. N Engl J Med. 1996;335:217–225[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  5. Van Domburg RT, Foley DP, Breeman A, van der Herwerden LA, Serruys PW. Coronary artery bypass graft surgery and percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty. 20 year outcome. Eur Heart J. 2002;23:543–549[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  6. Rodriguez A, Bernardi V, Navia J. Argentine Randomized Study: Coronary Angioplasty with Stenting versus Coronary Bypass Surgery in patients with Multiple-Vessel Disease (ERACI II): 30-day and one-year follow-up results. ERACI II Investigators. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2001;37:51–58[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  7. Serruys PW, Unger F, Sousa JE. Comparison of coronary-artery bypass surgery and stenting for the treatment of multivessel disease. N Engl J Med. 2001;344:1117–1124[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  8. Booth J. Clinical outcomes in patients randomised to coronary artery bypass grafting or percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty with stent implantation: results from the SoS (Stent or Surgery) trial (Abstr). Eur Heart J. 2001;22:232
  9. Goy JJ, Kaufmann U, Goy-Eggenberger D. A prospective randomized trial comparing stenting to internal mammary artery grafting for proximal, isolated de novo left anterior coronary artery stenosis: the SIMA trial. Stenting vs Internal Mammary Artery. Mayo Clin Proc. 2000;75:1116–1123[Abstract]
  10. Morrison DAM, Sethi G, Sacks J. Percutaneous coronary intervention versus coronary artery bypass graft surgery for patients with medically refractory myocardial ischemia and risk factors for adverse outcomes with bypass: a multicenter, randomized trial. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2001;38:143–149[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  11. Pocock SJ, Henderson RA, Rickards AF. Meta-analysis of randomised trials comparing coronary angioplasty with bypass surgery. Lancet. 1995;346:1184–1189[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
  12. N Engl J Med. 1996;335:217–225[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  13. Abizaid A, Costa MA, Centemero M. Clinical and economic impact of diabetes mellitus on percutaneous and surgical treatment of multivessel coronary disease patients: insights from the Arterial Revascularization Therapy Study (ARTS) trial. Circulation. 2001;104:533–538[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  14. Newman MF, Kirchner JL, Phillips-Bute B. Longitudinal assessment of neurocognitive function after coronary-artery bypass surgery. N Engl J Med. 2001;344:395–402[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  15. Serruys P, Crean P, Unger F. Arterial revascularization therapy study (ARTS): a randomized trial of stenting in multivessel coronary disease versus bypass surgery. Two year results (Abstr). Eur Heart J. 2001;22:232

Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?



This Article
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow E-letters: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when E-letters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Eberli, F.R.
Right arrow Articles by Meier, B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Eberli, F.R.
Right arrow Articles by Meier, B.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?