Copyright © 2002 by the European Society of Cardiology.
Randomized comparison of enoxaparin with unfractionated heparin following fibrinolytic therapy for acute myocardial infarction
Department of Cardiology, Antrim Area Hospital, Antrim, N. Ireland, U.K.
revised July 24, 2001; accepted July 25, 2001
Abstract
Aims To compare the efficacy and safety of low molecular weight heparin with unfractionated heparin following fibrinolytic therapy for acute myocardial infarction.
Methods and Results Three-hundred patients receiving fibrinolytic therapy following acute myocardial infarction were randomly assigned to low molecular weight heparin as enoxaparin (40mg intravenous bolus, then 40mg subcutaneously every 8h, n=149) or unfractionated heparin (5000U intravenous bolus, then 30000U.24h–1, adjusted to an activated partial thromboplastin time 2–2·5x normal, n=151) for 4 days in conjunction with routine therapy. Clinical and therapeutic variables were analysed, in addition to use of enoxaparin or unfractionated heparin, to determine independent predictors of the 90-day composite triple end-point (death, non-fatal reinfarction, or readmission with unstable angina). The triple end-point occurred more frequently in patients receiving unfractionated heparin rather than enoxaparin (36% vs. 26%;P =0·04). Logistic regression modelling of baseline and clinical variables identified the only independent risk factors for recurrent events as left ventricular failure, hypertension, and use of unfractionated heparin rather than enoxaparin. There was no difference in major haemorrhage between those receiving enoxaparin (3%) and unfractionated heparin (4%).
Conclusion Use of enoxaparin compared with unfractionated heparin in patients receiving fibrinolytic therapy for acute myocardial infarction was associated with fewer recurrent cardiac events at 90 days. This benefit was independent of other important clinical and therapeutic factors.
Key Words: Low molecular weight heparin, unfractionated heparin, fibrinolytic therapy, acute myocardial infarction
f1 Correspondence: Dr I. B. A. Menown, MD, MRCP, Department of Cardiology, Antrim Area Hospital, Antrim BT41 2RL, N. Ireland, U.K.
CiteULike 
Connotea 
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  D. J. Quinlan and J. W. Eikelboom Low-Molecular-Weight Heparin as an Adjunct to Thrombolysis in ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction Arch Intern Med, June 22, 2009; 169(12): 1163 - 1164. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 S. G. Goodman, V. Menon, C. P. Cannon, G. Steg, E. M. Ohman, and R. A. Harrington Acute ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction: American College of Chest Physicians Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Guidelines (8th Edition) Chest, June 1, 2008; 133(6_suppl): 708S - 775S. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 S. A. Murphy, C. M. Gibson, D. A. Morrow, F. Van de Werf, I. B. Menown, S. G. Goodman, K. W. Mahaffey, M. Cohen, C. H. McCabe, E. M. Antman, et al. Efficacy and safety of the low-molecular weight heparin enoxaparin compared with unfractionated heparin across the acute coronary syndrome spectrum: a meta-analysis Eur. Heart J., September 1, 2007; 28(17): 2077 - 2086. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 J. W. Eikelboom, D. J. Quinlan, S. R. Mehta, A. G. Turpie, I. B. Menown, and S. Yusuf Unfractionated and Low-Molecular-Weight Heparin as Adjuncts to Thrombolysis in Aspirin-Treated Patients With ST-Elevation Acute Myocardial Infarction: A Meta-Analysis of the Randomized Trials Circulation, December 20, 2005; 112(25): 3855 - 3867. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
Part 8: Stabilization of the Patient With Acute Coronary Syndromes Circulation, December 13, 2005; 112(24_suppl): IV-89 - IV-110. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
Part 5: Acute Coronary Syndromes Circulation, November 29, 2005; 112(22_suppl): III-55 - III-72. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 J. S Kalus and L. R Moser Evolving Role of Low-Molecular-Weight Heparins in ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction Ann. Pharmacother., March 1, 2005; 39(3): 481 - 491. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
V. Menon, R. A. Harrington, J. S. Hochman, C. P. Cannon, S. D. Goodman, R. G. Wilcox, H. J. Schunemann, and E. M. Ohman Thrombolysis and Adjunctive Therapy in Acute Myocardial Infarction: The Seventh ACCP Conference on Antithrombotic and Thrombolytic Therapy Chest, September 1, 2004; 126(3_suppl): 549S - 575S. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 G. C. Wong, R. P. Giugliano, and E. M. Antman Use of Low-Molecular-Weight Heparins in the Management of Acute Coronary Artery Syndromes and Percutaneous Coronary Intervention JAMA, January 15, 2003; 289(3): 331 - 342. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
C.P. Cannon A reply Eur. Heart J., October 2, 2002; 23(20): 1633 - 1634. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
C.P. Cannon Enoxaparin in ST elevation MI--a bright future Eur. Heart J., April 2, 2002; 23(8): 591 - 592. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|