Skip Navigation

European Heart Journal 2003 24(12):1153-1163; doi:10.1016/S0195-668X(03)00113-1
Copyright © 2003 by the European Society of Cardiology.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow E-letters: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when E-letters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (20)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Marwick, T.H.
Right arrow Articles by Thomas, J.D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Marwick, T.H.
Right arrow Articles by Thomas, J.D.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Regular Articles

Clinical and economic impact of exercise electrocardiography and exercise echocardiography in clinical practice

T.H. Marwicka,*, L. Shawb, C. Casea, C. Vaseyc and J.D. Thomasd

a Department of Medicine, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia
b Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA
c Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, OH, USA
d Asheville Cardiology Associates, Asheville, NC, USA

* Corresponding author. Prof. T. Marwick, University Department of Medicine, Princess Alexandra Hospital, Brisbane, Qld 4102, Australia. Tel: +61-7-3240-5346; fax: +61-7-3240-5399
E-mail address: tmarwick{at}soms.uq.edu.au

Received 3 December 2002; revised 7 February 2003; accepted 10 February 2003

Background Patients with known or suspected coronary disease are often investigated to facilitate risk assessment. We sought to examine the cost-effectiveness of strategies based on exercise echocardiography and exercise electrocardiography.

Methods and results We studied 7656 patients undergoing exercise testing; of whom half underwent exercise echocardiography. Risk was defined with the Duke treadmill score for those undergoing exercise electrocardiography alone, and by the extent of ischaemia by exercise echocardiography. Cox proportional hazards models, risk adjusted for pretest likelihood of coronary artery disease, were used to estimate time to cardiac death or myocardial infarction. Costs (including diagnostic and revascularisation procedures, hospitalisations, and events) were calculated, inflation-corrected to year 2000 using Medicare trust fund rates and discounted at a rate of 5%. A decision model was employed to assess the marginal cost effectiveness (cost/life year saved) of exercise echo compared with exercise electrocardiography. Exercise echocardiography identified more patients as low-risk (51% vs 24%, p<0.001), and fewer as intermediate- (27% vs 51%, p<0.001) and high-risk (22% vs 4%); survival was greater in low- and intermediate-risk and less in high-risk patients. Although initial procedural costs and revascularisation costs (in intermediate-high risk patients) were greater, exercise echocardiography was associated with a greater incremental life expectancy (0.2 years) and a lower use of additional diagnostic procedures when compared with exercise electrocardiography (especially in lower risk patients). Using decision analysis, exercise echocardiography (2615/life year saved) was more cost effective than exercise electrocardiography.

Conclusion Exercise echocardiography may enhance cost-effectiveness for the detection and management of at risk patients with known or suspected coronary disease.

Key Words: Cost effectiveness • risk • coronary artery disease • exercise electrocardiography • exercise echocardiography


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J Am Coll CardiolHome page
A. Bouzas-Mosquera, J. Peteiro, N. Alvarez-Garcia, F. J. Broullon, V. X. Mosquera, L. Garcia-Bueno, L. Ferro, and A. Castro-Beiras
Prediction of mortality and major cardiac events by exercise echocardiography in patients with normal exercise electrocardiographic testing.
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., May 26, 2009; 53(21): 1981 - 1990.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Br Med BullHome page
J. Stirrup, K. Wechalekar, A. Maenhout, and C. Anagnostopoulos
Cardiac radionuclide imaging in stable coronary artery disease and acute coronary syndromes
Br. Med. Bull., March 1, 2009; 89(1): 63 - 78.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur Heart JHome page
C. Marcassa, J. J. Bax, F. Bengel, B. Hesse, C. L. Petersen, E. Reyes, R. Underwood, and on behalf of the European Council of Nuclear Cardi
Clinical value, cost-effectiveness, and safety of myocardial perfusion scintigraphy: a position statement
Eur. Heart J., February 2, 2008; 29(4): 557 - 563.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur Heart JHome page
P. Jeetley and R. Senior
Stress echocardiography compared to exercise ECG for the assessment of acute coronary syndrome: reply
Eur. Heart J., August 1, 2007; 28(15): 1912 - 1912.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur Heart JHome page
P. Jeetley, L. Burden, B. Stoykova, and R. Senior
Clinical and economic impact of stress echocardiography compared with exercise electrocardiography in patients with suspected acute coronary syndrome but negative troponin: a prospective randomized controlled study
Eur. Heart J., January 16, 2007; (2007) ehl444v1.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur Heart JHome page
L. J. Shaw, T. H. Marwick, D. S. Berman, S. Sawada, G. V. Heller, C. Vasey, and D. D. Miller
Incremental cost-effectiveness of exercise echocardiography vs. SPECT imaging for the evaluation of stable chest pain
Eur. Heart J., October 2, 2006; 27(20): 2448 - 2458.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur Heart JHome page
L. J. Shaw, P. Raggi, T. Q. Callister, and D. S. Berman
Prognostic value of coronary artery calcium screening in asymptomatic smokers and non-smokers
Eur. Heart J., April 2, 2006; 27(8): 968 - 975.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur J EchocardiogrHome page
A. D'Andrea, S. Severino, P. Caso, B. Liccardo, A. Forni, A. Fusco, R. Lo Piccolo, M. Scherillo, N. Mininni, and R. Calabro
Prognostic value of supine bicycle exercise stress echocardiography in patients with known or suspected coronary artery disease
Eur J Echocardiogr, August 1, 2005; 6(4): 271 - 279.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Coll CardiolHome page
W. F. Armstrong and W. A. Zoghbi
Stress Echocardiography: Current Methodology and Clinical Applications
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., June 7, 2005; 45(11): 1739 - 1747.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur J EchocardiogrHome page
T. H. Marwick
Can we Justify the Cost of Echocardiography? Lessons from Outcomes Research
Eur J Echocardiogr, June 1, 2005; 6(3): 155 - 163.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
HeartHome page
R Senior, M Monaghan, H Becher, J Mayet, and P Nihoyannopoulos
Stress echocardiography for the diagnosis and risk stratification of patients with suspected or known coronary artery disease: a critical appraisal. Supported by the British Society of Echocardiography
Heart, April 1, 2005; 91(4): 427 - 436.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
J. H. Mieres, L. J. Shaw, A. Arai, M. J. Budoff, S. D. Flamm, W. G. Hundley, T. H. Marwick, L. Mosca, A. R. Patel, M. A. Quinones, et al.
Role of Noninvasive Testing in the Clinical Evaluation of Women With Suspected Coronary Artery Disease: Consensus Statement From the Cardiac Imaging Committee, Council on Clinical Cardiology, and the Cardiovascular Imaging and Intervention Committee, Council on Cardiovascular Radiology and Intervention, American Heart Association
Circulation, February 8, 2005; 111(5): 682 - 696.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.