Copyright © 2003 by the European Society of Cardiology.
Regular Articles
Clinical and economic impact of exercise electrocardiography and exercise echocardiography in clinical practice
a Department of Medicine, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia
b Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA
c Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, OH, USA
d Asheville Cardiology Associates, Asheville, NC, USA
* Corresponding author. Prof. T. Marwick, University Department of Medicine, Princess Alexandra Hospital, Brisbane, Qld 4102, Australia. Tel: +61-7-3240-5346; fax: +61-7-3240-5399
E-mail address: tmarwick{at}soms.uq.edu.au
Received 3 December 2002; revised 7 February 2003; accepted 10 February 2003
Background Patients with known or suspected coronary disease are often investigated to facilitate risk assessment. We sought to examine the cost-effectiveness of strategies based on exercise echocardiography and exercise electrocardiography.
Methods and results We studied 7656 patients undergoing exercise testing; of whom half underwent exercise echocardiography. Risk was defined with the Duke treadmill score for those undergoing exercise electrocardiography alone, and by the extent of ischaemia by exercise echocardiography. Cox proportional hazards models, risk adjusted for pretest likelihood of coronary artery disease, were used to estimate time to cardiac death or myocardial infarction. Costs (including diagnostic and revascularisation procedures, hospitalisations, and events) were calculated, inflation-corrected to year 2000 using Medicare trust fund rates and discounted at a rate of 5%. A decision model was employed to assess the marginal cost effectiveness (cost/life year saved) of exercise echo compared with exercise electrocardiography. Exercise echocardiography identified more patients as low-risk (51% vs 24%, p<0.001), and fewer as intermediate- (27% vs 51%, p<0.001) and high-risk (22% vs 4%); survival was greater in low- and intermediate-risk and less in high-risk patients. Although initial procedural costs and revascularisation costs (in intermediate-high risk patients) were greater, exercise echocardiography was associated with a greater incremental life expectancy (0.2 years) and a lower use of additional diagnostic procedures when compared with exercise electrocardiography (especially in lower risk patients). Using decision analysis, exercise echocardiography (
2615/life year saved) was more cost effective than exercise electrocardiography.
Conclusion Exercise echocardiography may enhance cost-effectiveness for the detection and management of at risk patients with known or suspected coronary disease.
Key Words: Cost effectiveness risk coronary artery disease exercise electrocardiography exercise echocardiography
![]()
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
A. Bouzas-Mosquera, J. Peteiro, N. Alvarez-Garcia, F. J. Broullon, V. X. Mosquera, L. Garcia-Bueno, L. Ferro, and A. Castro-Beiras Prediction of mortality and major cardiac events by exercise echocardiography in patients with normal exercise electrocardiographic testing. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., May 26, 2009; 53(21): 1981 - 1990. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Stirrup, K. Wechalekar, A. Maenhout, and C. Anagnostopoulos Cardiac radionuclide imaging in stable coronary artery disease and acute coronary syndromes Br. Med. Bull., March 1, 2009; 89(1): 63 - 78. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. Marcassa, J. J. Bax, F. Bengel, B. Hesse, C. L. Petersen, E. Reyes, R. Underwood, and on behalf of the European Council of Nuclear Cardi Clinical value, cost-effectiveness, and safety of myocardial perfusion scintigraphy: a position statement Eur. Heart J., February 2, 2008; 29(4): 557 - 563. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. Jeetley and R. Senior Stress echocardiography compared to exercise ECG for the assessment of acute coronary syndrome: reply Eur. Heart J., August 1, 2007; 28(15): 1912 - 1912. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. Jeetley, L. Burden, B. Stoykova, and R. Senior Clinical and economic impact of stress echocardiography compared with exercise electrocardiography in patients with suspected acute coronary syndrome but negative troponin: a prospective randomized controlled study Eur. Heart J., January 16, 2007; (2007) ehl444v1. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. J. Shaw, T. H. Marwick, D. S. Berman, S. Sawada, G. V. Heller, C. Vasey, and D. D. Miller Incremental cost-effectiveness of exercise echocardiography vs. SPECT imaging for the evaluation of stable chest pain Eur. Heart J., October 2, 2006; 27(20): 2448 - 2458. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. J. Shaw, P. Raggi, T. Q. Callister, and D. S. Berman Prognostic value of coronary artery calcium screening in asymptomatic smokers and non-smokers Eur. Heart J., April 2, 2006; 27(8): 968 - 975. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. D'Andrea, S. Severino, P. Caso, B. Liccardo, A. Forni, A. Fusco, R. Lo Piccolo, M. Scherillo, N. Mininni, and R. Calabro Prognostic value of supine bicycle exercise stress echocardiography in patients with known or suspected coronary artery disease Eur J Echocardiogr, August 1, 2005; 6(4): 271 - 279. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
W. F. Armstrong and W. A. Zoghbi Stress Echocardiography: Current Methodology and Clinical Applications J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., June 7, 2005; 45(11): 1739 - 1747. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. H. Marwick Can we Justify the Cost of Echocardiography? Lessons from Outcomes Research Eur J Echocardiogr, June 1, 2005; 6(3): 155 - 163. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R Senior, M Monaghan, H Becher, J Mayet, and P Nihoyannopoulos Stress echocardiography for the diagnosis and risk stratification of patients with suspected or known coronary artery disease: a critical appraisal. Supported by the British Society of Echocardiography Heart, April 1, 2005; 91(4): 427 - 436. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. H. Mieres, L. J. Shaw, A. Arai, M. J. Budoff, S. D. Flamm, W. G. Hundley, T. H. Marwick, L. Mosca, A. R. Patel, M. A. Quinones, et al. Role of Noninvasive Testing in the Clinical Evaluation of Women With Suspected Coronary Artery Disease: Consensus Statement From the Cardiac Imaging Committee, Council on Clinical Cardiology, and the Cardiovascular Imaging and Intervention Committee, Council on Cardiovascular Radiology and Intervention, American Heart Association Circulation, February 8, 2005; 111(5): 682 - 696. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||





