Skip Navigation

European Heart Journal 2003 24(13):1254-1263; doi:10.1016/S0195-668X(03)00235-5
Copyright © 2003 by the European Society of Cardiology.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow E-letters: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when E-letters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (12)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Das, P.
Right arrow Articles by Chambers, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Das, P.
Right arrow Articles by Chambers, J.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Regular Articles

Determinants of symptoms and exercise capacity in aortic stenosis: a comparison of resting haemodynamics and valve compliance during dobutamine stress

Paul Dasa,*, Helen Rimingtona, Nigel Smeetonb and John Chambersa

a Valve Study Group, Cardiothoracic Centre, Guy’s and St. Thomas’ Hospitals, London, UK
b Department of Public Health Sciences, King’s College, London, UK

* Correspondence to: Dr Paul Das, Specialist Registrar, Department of Cardiology, Wythenshawe Hospital, Southmoor Road, Manchester M23 9LT, UK. Tel.: +44-(0)161-291-2402; fax: +44-(0)161-291-2389
E-mail address: Pauldas{at}compuserve.com

Received 7 December 2002; revised 25 February 2003; accepted 26 March 2003

Aims Valve compliance might determine the onset of symptoms better than resting measures of aortic stenosis. This study compared valve compliance measured by dobutamine stress echocardiography with resting haemodynamic variables against the end-point of symptoms at low workload during exercise testing.

Methods and results Echocardiography was performed at rest and during each stage of a dobutamine stress test in 65 asymptomatic patients with moderate or severe aortic stenosis. Each patient also completed a modified Bruce treadmill exercise test. During dobutamine stress, peak transaortic velocity increased by 1.0 (0.4) m/s and effective orifice area by 0.25 (0.22) cm2. Valve compliance was 0.23 (0.10) cm2/100ml.s–1, and was independent of baseline effective orifice area. In the 19 patients limited by symptoms on exercise testing, valve compliance was significantly lower (0.19 (0.09) cm2/100ml.s–1) than in those who remained asymptomatic (0.25 (0.10) cm2/100ml.s–1, p=0.03). Effective orifice area at peak stress was also lower (1.0 (0.3) vs 1.2 (0.4) cm2, p=0.03), but there were no significant differences in resting measures of effective orifice area, transaortic velocity, or mean pressure drop.

Conclusions Effective orifice area is flow-dependent in patients with moderate and severe aortic stenosis with preserved left ventricular function. Exertional symptoms are better predicted by compliance than resting effective orifice area, mean pressure drop or peak transaortic velocity.

Key Words: Aortic stenosis • Valve compliance • Stress echocardiography


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
HeartHome page
P V Ennezat, S Marechaux, B Iung, C Chauvel, T H LeJemtel, and P Pibarot
Exercise testing and exercise stress echocardiography in asymptomatic aortic valve stenosis
Heart, June 1, 2009; 95(11): 877 - 884.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur J EchocardiogrHome page
G. Leurent, E. Donal, C. de Place, C. Chabanne, R. Gervais, C. Fougerou, A. le Helloco, J.-C. Daubert, P. Mabo, and M. Laurent
Argument for a Doppler echocardiography during exercise in assessing asymptomatic patients with severe aortic stenosis
Eur J Echocardiogr, January 1, 2009; 10(1): 69 - 73.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur J EchocardiogrHome page
J. B. Chambers
Aortic stenosis
Eur J Echocardiogr, January 1, 2009; 10(1): i11 - i19.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur J EchocardiogrHome page
P. Lancellotti, D. Karsera, G. Tumminello, F. Lebois, and L. A. Pierard
Determinants of an abnormal response to exercise in patients with asymptomatic valvular aortic stenosis
Eur J Echocardiogr, May 1, 2008; 9(3): 338 - 343.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
HeartHome page
J. Chambers
Low "gradient", low flow aortic stenosis.
Heart, April 1, 2006; 92(4): 554 - 558.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
C. Blais, I. G. Burwash, G. Mundigler, J. G. Dumesnil, N. Loho, F. Rader, H. Baumgartner, R. S. Beanlands, B. Chayer, L. Kadem, et al.
Projected Valve Area at Normal Flow Rate Improves the Assessment of Stenosis Severity in Patients With Low-Flow, Low-Gradient Aortic Stenosis: The Multicenter TOPAS (Truly or Pseudo-Severe Aortic Stenosis) Study
Circulation, February 7, 2006; 113(5): 711 - 721.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
P. Lancellotti, F. Lebois, M. Simon, C. Tombeux, C. Chauvel, and L. A. Pierard
Prognostic Importance of Quantitative Exercise Doppler Echocardiography in Asymptomatic Valvular Aortic Stenosis
Circulation, August 30, 2005; 112(9_suppl): I-377 - I-382.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur Heart JHome page
P. Das, H. Rimington, and J. Chambers
Exercise testing to stratify risk in aortic stenosis
Eur. Heart J., July 1, 2005; 26(13): 1309 - 1313.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.