Skip Navigation

European Heart Journal 2003 24(19):1796; doi:10.1016/S0195-668X(03)00473-1
Copyright © 2003 by the European Society of Cardiology.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow E-letters: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when E-letters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hense, H.-W.
Right arrow Articles by Schulte, H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Hense, H.-W.
Right arrow Articles by Schulte, H.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Letter to the Editor

Response to the letter by Müller-Nordhorn and Willich

Hans-Werner Hense* and Helmut Schulte

Institute of Epidemiology & Social Medicine, University of Muenster, Muenster, Germany

* Correspondence to: Tel: +49-251-8355399; Fax: +49 251 835 5300
E-mail address: hense@uni-muenster.de

The first 10% of the full text of this article appears below.

Dear Sir,

We thank Drs Müller-Nordhorn and Willich for their interest in our paper. They critically question the validity of our conclusion that the Framingham risk function overestimates risk of coronary heart disease in men and women from Germany. Firstly, they assume a potentially strong healthy worker effect among the . . . [Full Text of this Article]


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?