Copyright © 2003 by the European Society of Cardiology.
Regular Articles
Clinical and angiographic outcome of patients with mild coronary lesions treated with balloon angioplasty or coronary stenting
Implications for mechanical plaque sealing
a Thoraxcentre, University Hospital Dijkzigt, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
b Department of Cardiology, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
c Cardialysis, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
d Division of Cardiology, William Beaumont Hospital, Royal Oak, MI, USA
e Division of Cardiovascular Diseases, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
f Swiss Cardiovascular Centre Bern, University Hospital, Bern, Switzerland
g Cardiovascular Centre, Onze Lieve Vrouw Ziekenhuis, Aalst, Belgium
* Corresponding author. Clinical Epidemiology Unit, Room H-543, Department of Cardiology, Thoraxcentre, University Hospital Dijkzigt, Dr Molewaterplein 40, 3015 GD Rotterdam, The Netherlands. Tel.: +31-10-463-3909; fax: +31-10-4089484
E-mail address: boersma{at}thch.azr.nl
Received 27 March 2002; revised 11 June 2002; accepted 12 June 2002
Aims To investigate the clinical and angiographic outcome of patients with mild coronary lesions treated with balloon angioplasty or coronary stenting (coronary plaque sealing, i.e. dilatation of angiographically non-significant lesions) compared to moderate and severe stenoses.
Methods and results Patients with chronic stable angina and a single de novo lesion in a native coronary vessel scheduled to undergo percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) were selected from 14 different studies. Off-line analysis of angiographic outcomes was assessed in all patients using identical and standardised methods of data acquisition, analysis and definitions. Clinical endpoints were adjudicated by independent clinical events committees. All quantitative coronary angiographic (QCA) analyses were performed in the same core laboratory. Stenosis severity prior to PCI was categorised into three groups: <50% diameter stenosis (DS), 50–99%DS and >99%DS pre. A total of 3812 patients were included in this study; 1484 patients (39%) were successfully treated with balloon angioplasty (BA) only and stented angioplasty was performed in 2328 patients (61%).
One-year mortality and rate of non-fatal myocardial infarction (MI) (Kaplan–Meier) did not differ between BA and stented angioplasty for any of the stenosis severity categories. Following BA, the combined event rate (death and non-fatal MI) was 4.8, 4.6 and 0% in the <50, 50–99 and >99%DS categories, respectively. Following stented angioplasty, the combined event rate was 3.1, 4.4 and 4.8% in the same categories. The need for repeat revascularisation corrected for stenosis severity in the Cox proportional-hazards regression model was reduced by 20% after stented angioplasty (hazard ratio (HR) 0.80, 95%CI 0.69–0.93).
Conclusion The concept of plaque sealing is appealing from the theoretical point of view. However, with current technology, plaque sealing cannot prevent death and future non-fatal MIs in the long-term because 1-year event rates after PCI of non-significant stenoses remain unacceptably elevated when compared with the estimated 1-year probability of a non-fatal MI in lesions with a <50%DS. Moreover, major adverse cardiac events at 1-year after PCI are not directly related to the degree of pre-procedural stenosis severity.
Key Words: Balloon angioplasty • Coronary stenting • Plaque sealing
CiteULike 
Connotea 
Del.icio.us What's this?
Related articles in EHJ:
- Who wants his plaque sealed?
- Martin Oberhoff and Karl R Karsch
EHJ 2003 24: 494-495.[Extract] [FREE Full Text]
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  G. Sarno, I. Decraemer, P. K. Vanhoenacker, B. De Bruyne, M. Hamilos, T. Cuisset, E. Wyffels, J. Bartunek, G. R. Heyndrickx, and W. Wijns On the Inappropriateness of Noninvasive Multidetector Computed Tomography Coronary Angiography to Trigger Coronary Revascularization: A Comparison With Invasive Angiography J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. Intv., June 1, 2009; 2(6): 550 - 557. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 H. O. Caymaz and G. Yuksel Fate of Incidental, Asymptomatic Lesions Discovered During Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Angiology, May 1, 2008; 59(2): 193 - 197. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 A. Konig and V. Klauss Virtual histology Heart, August 1, 2007; 93(8): 977 - 982. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 Authors/Task Force Members, J.-P. Bassand, C. W. Hamm, D. Ardissino, E. Boersma, A. Budaj, F. Fernandez-Aviles, K. A.A. Fox, D. Hasdai, E. M. Ohman, et al. Guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndromes: The Task Force for the Diagnosis and Treatment of Non-ST-Segment Elevation Acute Coronary Syndromes of the European Society of Cardiology Eur. Heart J., July 1, 2007; 28(13): 1598 - 1660. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
K. I. Saunamaki Virtual histology and the hunt for the vulnerable plaque Eur. Heart J., December 2, 2006; 27(24): 2914 - 2915. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 J. W. Moses, G. W. Stone, E. Nikolsky, G. S. Mintz, G. Dangas, E. Grube, S. G. Ellis, A. J. Lansky, G. Weisz, M. Fahy, et al. Drug-Eluting Stents in the Treatment of Intermediate Lesions: Pooled Analysis From Four Randomized Trials J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., June 6, 2006; 47(11): 2164 - 2171. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 J. Sprung, M. J. Ritter, C. S. Rihal, M. E. Warner, G. A. Wilson, B. A. Williams, S. R. Stevens, D. R. Schroeder, D. L. Bourke, and D. O. Warner Outcomes of Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Predictors of Survival in Patients Undergoing Coronary Angiography Including Percutaneous Coronary Interventions Anesth. Analg., January 1, 2006; 102(1): 217 - 224. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
S. Achenbach and W. G. Daniel Computed Tomography of the Coronary Arteries: More Than Meets the (Angiographic) Eye J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., July 5, 2005; 46(1): 155 - 157. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
Authors/Task Force Members, S. Silber, P. Albertsson, F. F. Aviles, P. G. Camici, A. Colombo, C. Hamm, E. Jorgensen, J. Marco, J.-E. Nordrehaug, et al. Guidelines for Percutaneous Coronary Interventions: The Task Force for Percutaneous Coronary Interventions of the European Society of Cardiology Eur. Heart J., April 2, 2005; 26(8): 804 - 847. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 R. Glaser, F. Selzer, D. P. Faxon, W. K. Laskey, H. A. Cohen, J. Slater, K. M. Detre, and R. L. Wilensky Clinical Progression of Incidental, Asymptomatic Lesions Discovered During Culprit Vessel Coronary Intervention Circulation, January 18, 2005; 111(2): 143 - 149. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
B Meier Plaque sealing by coronary angioplasty Heart, December 1, 2004; 90(12): 1395 - 1398. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
G. Rioufol, M. Gilard, G. Finet, I. Ginon, J. Boschat, and X. Andre-Fouet Evolution of Spontaneous Atherosclerotic Plaque Rupture With Medical Therapy: Long-Term Follow-Up With Intravascular Ultrasound Circulation, November 2, 2004; 110(18): 2875 - 2880. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
N. H J Pijls Optimum guidance of complex PCI by coronary pressure measurement Heart, September 1, 2004; 90(9): 1085 - 1093. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
J. A Schaar, J. E Muller, E. Falk, R. Virmani, V. Fuster, P. W Serruys, A. Colombo, C. Stefanadis, S Ward Casscells, P. R Moreno, et al. Terminology for high-risk and vulnerable coronary artery plaques Eur. Heart J., June 2, 2004; 25(12): 1077 - 1082. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
A. J Nordmann, P. Hengstler, B. M Leimenstoll, T. Harr, J. Young, and H. C Bucher Clinical outcomes of stents versus balloon angioplasty in non-acute coronary artery disease: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials Eur. Heart J., January 1, 2004; 25(1): 69 - 80. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
M. Oberhoff and K. R Karsch Who wants his plaque sealed? Eur. Heart J., March 2, 2003; 24(6): 494 - 495. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|