Copyright © 2004 by the European Society of Cardiology.
Clinical research
Long-term survival after pacemaker implantation
Prognostic importance of gender and baseline patient characteristics
a Innere Medizin III-Kardiologie und Angiologie, Universitätsklinik Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
b Institut für medizinische Biometrie und Informatik der Universitätsklinik Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
* Correspondence to: Dr Michael Brunner, Universitätsklinik Freiburg, Innere Medizin III-Kardiologie und Angiologie, Hugstetterstr. 55, D-79106 Freiburg, Germany. Tel: +49-761-270-3401, Fax: +49-761-270-3799
E-mail address: brunner{at}medizin.ukl.uni-freiburg.de
Received 27 June 2003; revised 1 October 2003; accepted 16 October 2003
Abstract
Permanent cardiac pacing is the treatment of choice in severe and symptomatic bradycardia. To determine factors associated with longer survival we analysed the survival times and baseline characteristics of 6505 patients after pacemaker implantation. This longitudinal study with 30 years of follow-up was performed in a single centre university hospital with all-cause mortality as the end-point.
In 6505 patients we analysed a total of 30 948 years of patient follow-up, median survival was 101.9 months (
8.5 years), with 44.8% of patients alive after 10 years and 21.4% alive after 20 years. In all subgroups women had a significantly longer survival than men (118 vs 91.7 months, P<0.0001), despite a markedly higher age at implantation (73.2 years vs 71 years, P<0.0001). Survival of patients with sick-sinus-syndrome was significantly better than in patients with high degree AV-block, which in turn, was better than survival of patients with atrial fibrillation (132.9 months vs 94.2 months vs 85.1 months, P<0.0001). Multivariate analysis revealed several independent factors: age, gender, decade of implantation, type of pacemaker, index arrhythmia and initial symptoms. Interestingly, if only the patients of the last decade were analysed multivariately, neither pacing mode nor index arrhythmia wereindependently associated with survival.
In conclusion, survival of patients with pacemakers is independently influenced by several baseline characteristics which can identify patients with very long survival.
Key Words: Artificial pacemaker • Long-term survival • Gender
CiteULike 
Connotea 
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  B. Nowak, B. Misselwitz, on behalf of the expert committee 'Pacemaker', Ins, A. Erdogan, R. Funck, W. Irnich, C.W. Israel, H.-G. Olbrich, H. Schmidt, J. Sperzel, et al. Do gender differences exist in pacemaker implantation?--results of an obligatory external quality control program Europace, October 28, 2009; (2009) eup312v1. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
S. Asbach, M. Olschewski, T. S. Faber, M. Zehender, C. Bode, and M. Brunner Mortality in patients with atrial fibrillation has significantly decreased during the last three decades: 35 years of follow-up in 1627 pacemaker patients Europace, April 1, 2008; 10(4): 391 - 394. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
E. de Teresa, J. J. Gomez-Doblas, G. Lamas, J. Alzueta, I. Fernandez-Lozano, E. Cobo, X. Navarro, F. Navarro-Lopez, and M. Stockburger Preventing ventricular dysfunction in pacemaker patients without advanced heart failure: rationale and design of the PREVENT-HF study Europace, June 1, 2007; 9(6): 442 - 446. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
R. C. Funck, J.-J. Blanc, H.-H. Mueller, C. Schade-Brittinger, C. Bailleul, B. Maisch, and for the BioPace Study Group Biventricular stimulation to prevent cardiac desynchronization: rationale, design, and endpoints of the 'Biventricular Pacing for Atrioventricular Block to Prevent Cardiac Desynchronization (BioPace)' study. Europace, August 1, 2006; 8(8): 629 - 635. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
G. Boriani, L. Rusconi, M. Biffi, L. Pavia, M. Sassara, D. Malfitano, M. G. Bongiorni, L. Padeletti, I. Filice, D. Sanfelici, et al. Role of ventricular autocapture function in increasing longevity of DDDR pacemakers: a prospective study. Europace, March 1, 2006; 8(3): 216 - 220. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 W. L. Miller, K. V. Ballman, D. O. Hodge, R. J. Rodeheffer, and S. C. Hammill Risk Factor Implications of Incidentally Discovered Uncomplicated Bundle Branch Block Mayo Clin. Proc., December 1, 2005; 80(12): 1585 - 1590. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|