European Heart Journal Advance Access originally published online on November 23, 2004
European Heart Journal 2005 26(1):18-26; doi:10.1093/eurheartj/ehi002
Clinical research
Mortality rates in patients with ST-elevation vs. non-ST-elevation acute myocardial infarction: observations from an unselected cohort
1Department of Cardiology, Skejby University Hospital, DK-8200 Aarhus N, Denmark
2Department of Internal Medicine, Randers County Hospital, DK-8900 Randers, Denmark
Received 3 June 2004; revised 10 October 2004; accepted 14 October 2004 online publish-ahead-of-print 23 November 2004 * Corresponding author. Tel: +45 89496234; fax: +45 89496009. E-mail address: christian_juhl_terkelsen{at}hotmail.com
See page 1 for the editorial comment on this article (doi:10.1093/eurheartj/ehi062)
Aims Acute myocardial infarction (AMI) is categorized, according to the presenting electrocardiogram, into non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction (non-STEMI), ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI), or bundle branch block myocardial infarction (BBBMI). Data on the prognostic significance of these categories mainly originate from voluntary based registries or large-scale clinical trials and may be hampered by selection and information bias. The aim of this historical cohort study was to evaluate the prognostic significance of different categories of AMI in an unselected cohort.
Methods and results From 1 November 1999 to 31 October 2001, patient records were reviewed from all admissions to hospitals serving a study region with 139 000 inhabitants. An Endpoint Committee determined whether patients fulfilled the European Society of Cardiology criteria of AMI. A total of 654 patients with AMI were identified. The proportion having non-STEMI, STEMI, and BBBMI was 54, 39 and 6%, and the associated 1 year mortality was 31, 21, and 55%, respectively (log rank 54, P<0.001). The more favourable outcome observed in patients with STEMI remained significant according to multivariable analysis (P=0.044).
Conclusion In an unselected cohort of patients admitted with AMI, the mortality was considerably higher than expected from voluntary-based registries and large-scale clinical trials. The most favourable outcome is observed in patients with STEMI.
Key Words: Myocardial infarction Prognosis Cohort study Selection bias Information bias
![]()
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us What's this?
Related articles in EHJ:
- The veteran and the rookie
- Philip Urban
EHJ 2005 26: 1-2.[Extract] [FREE Full Text]
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
F. Van de Werf New antithrombotic agents: are they needed and what can they offer to patients with a non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndrome? Eur. Heart J., July 2, 2009; 30(14): 1695 - 1702. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Y. Chan, J. L. Sun, L. K. Newby, L. K. Shaw, M. Lin, E. D. Peterson, R. M. Califf, D. F. Kong, and M. T. Roe Long-Term Mortality of Patients Undergoing Cardiac Catheterization for ST-Elevation and Non-ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction Circulation, June 23, 2009; 119(24): 3110 - 3117. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Zimarino and R. De Caterina Long-term treatment strategies for atherothrombotic disease: do platelets define the course? Eur. Heart J. Suppl., November 1, 2008; 10(suppl_I): I8 - I13. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Authors/Task Force Members, J.-P. Bassand, C. W. Hamm, D. Ardissino, E. Boersma, A. Budaj, F. Fernandez-Aviles, K. A.A. Fox, D. Hasdai, E. M. Ohman, et al. Guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndromes: The Task Force for the Diagnosis and Treatment of Non-ST-Segment Elevation Acute Coronary Syndromes of the European Society of Cardiology Eur. Heart J., July 1, 2007; 28(13): 1598 - 1660. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. G. Steg, J. Lopez-Sendon, E. Lopez de Sa, S. G. Goodman, J. M. Gore, F. A. Anderson Jr, D. Himbert, J. Allegrone, F. Van de Werf, and for the GRACE Investigators External Validity of Clinical Trials in Acute Myocardial Infarction Arch Intern Med, January 8, 2007; 167(1): 68 - 73. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P G Steg, J-P Cambou, P Goldstein, E Durand, P Sauval, Z Kadri, D Blanchard, J-M Lablanche, P Gueret, Y Cottin, et al. Bypassing the emergency room reduces delays and mortality in ST elevation myocardial infarction: the USIC 2000 registry Heart, October 1, 2006; 92(10): 1378 - 1383. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. Rahimi, S. Watzlawek, H. Thiele, M.-A. Secknus, B.-F. Hayerizadeh, J. Niebauer, and G. Schuler Incidence, time course, and predictors of early malignant ventricular arrhythmias after non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction in patients with early invasive treatment Eur. Heart J., July 2, 2006; 27(14): 1706 - 1711. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
V. Salomaa, H. Koukkunen, M. Ketonen, P. Immonen-Raiha, P. Karja-Koskenkari, J. Mustonen, S. Lehto, J. Torppa, A. Lehtonen, J. Tuomilehto, et al. A new definition for myocardial infarction: what difference does it make? Eur. Heart J., September 1, 2005; 26(17): 1719 - 1725. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. Urban The veteran and the rookie Eur. Heart J., January 1, 2005; 26(1): 1 - 2. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||




