European Heart Journal Advance Access originally published online on June 23, 2005
European Heart Journal
2005 26(15):1475-1481; doi:10.1093/eurheartj/ehi405
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Prevention of restenosis by a novel drug-eluting stent system with a dose-adjustable, polymer-free, on-site stent coating
1Deutsches Herzzentrum München, Klinik an der Technischen Universität München, Lazarettstrasse 36, 80636 Munich, Germany
2Zentralinstitut für Medizintechnik; Technische Universität München, Garching, Germany
3Translumina Labs, Munich, Germany
4I. Medizinische Klinik des Klinikums rechts der Isar, Technische Universität, Munich, Germany
Received 9 May 2005; revised 3 June 2005; accepted 16 June 2005; online publish-ahead-of-print 23 June 2005.
* Corresponding author. Tel: +49 89 1218 4038; fax: +49 89 1218 4013. E-mail address: hausleiter{at}dhm.mhn.de
Aims Drug-eluting stents (DES) represent a major advance in interventional cardiology. Along with the success shown, current DES also present limitations related to the presence of polymer-coating, fixed drug, and dose used. With the ISAR (Individualized Drug-Eluting Stent System to Abrogate Restenosis) project, a DES system has been developed that permits individualized choice of the drug and dose to use for the given patient. The objective of this prospective dose finding study was to assess the feasibility, safety, and efficacy of a polymer-free on-site stent coating with increasing rapamycin doses.
Methods and results In this dose finding study, 602 patients were sequentially enrolled in four groups: microporous bare metal stent (BMS), DES stents coated with a 0.5, 1.0, and 2.0% rapamycin solution. The angiographic in-segment restenosis rate at follow-up angiography was the primary study endpoint. In-segment restenosis was significantly reduced from 25.9% with BMS to 18.9, 17.2, and 14.7% with 0.5, 1.0, and 2.0% rapamycin-eluting stents, respectively (P=0.024). Similarly, the need for target lesion revascularization at 1 year follow-up was reduced from 21.5% with BMS to 16.4, 12.6, and 8.8% with 0.5, 1.0, and 2.0% rapamycin-eluting stents, respectively (P=0.006).
Conclusion The placement of polymer-free stents coated on-site with rapamycin is feasible and safe. Furthermore, a dose-dependent efficacy in restenosis prevention is achievable with this new DES concept.
Key Words: Restenosis Stents Randomized Rapamycin Polymer
![]()
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
R. A. Byrne, A. Kastrati, S. Kufner, S. Massberg, K. A. Birkmeier, K.-L. Laugwitz, S. Schulz, J. Pache, M. Fusaro, M. Seyfarth, et al. Randomized, non-inferiority trial of three limus agent-eluting stents with different polymer coatings: the Intracoronary Stenting and Angiographic Results: Test Efficacy of 3 Limus-Eluting Stents (ISAR-TEST-4) Trial Eur. Heart J., October 2, 2009; 30(20): 2441 - 2449. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Peters, B. Behnisch, T. Heilmann, and C. Richter First-in-man use of polymer-free valsartan-eluting stents in small coronary vessels: a comparison to polymer-free rapamycin (2%)-eluting stents Journal of Renin-Angiotensin-Aldosterone System, June 1, 2009; 10(2): 91 - 95. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. Moore, P. Barlis, J. Spiro, G. Ghimire, M. Roughton, C. Di Mario, W. Wallis, C. Ilsley, A. Mitchell, M. Mason, et al. A Randomized Optical Coherence Tomography Study of Coronary Stent Strut Coverage and Luminal Protrusion With Rapamycin-Eluting Stents J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. Intv., May 1, 2009; 2(5): 437 - 444. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. A. Byrne, J. Mehilli, R. Iijima, S. Schulz, J. Pache, M. Seyfarth, A. Schomig, A. Kastrati, and for the Intracoronary Stenting and Angiographic Re A polymer-free dual drug-eluting stent in patients with coronary artery disease: a randomized trial vs. polymer-based drug-eluting stents Eur. Heart J., April 2, 2009; 30(8): 923 - 931. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. A. Byrne, R. Iijima, J. Mehilli, S. Pinieck, O. Bruskina, A. Schomig, and A. Kastrati Durability of Antirestenotic Efficacy in Drug-Eluting Stents With and Without Permanent Polymer J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. Intv., April 1, 2009; 2(4): 291 - 299. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. C. John, R. Wessely, A. Kastrati, A. Schomig, M. Joner, M. Uchihashi, J. Crimins, S. Lajoie, F. D. Kolodgie, H. K. Gold, et al. Differential Healing Responses in Polymer- and Nonpolymer-Based Sirolimus-Eluting Stents J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. Intv., October 1, 2008; 1(5): 535 - 544. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Mehilli, R. A. Byrne, A. Wieczorek, R. Iijima, S. Schulz, O. Bruskina, J. Pache, R. Wessely, A. Schomig, A. Kastrati, et al. Randomized trial of three rapamycin-eluting stents with different coating strategies for the reduction of coronary restenosis Eur. Heart J., August 2, 2008; 29(16): 1975 - 1982. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Abstracts Heart, June 1, 2007; 93(suppl_1): A5 - A105. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. Adriaenssens, J. Mehilli, R. Wessely, G. Ndrepepa, M. Seyfarth, A. Wieczorek, B. Blaich, R. Iijima, J. Pache, A. Kastrati, et al. Does Addition of Estradiol Improve the Efficacy of a Rapamycin-Eluting Stent?: Results of the ISAR-PEACE Randomized Trial J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., March 27, 2007; 49(12): 1265 - 1271. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Elezi, A. Dibra, J. Mehilli, J. Pache, R. Wessely, A. Schomig, and A. Kastrati Vessel Size and Outcome After Coronary Drug-Eluting Stent Placement: Results From a Large Cohort of Patients Treated With Sirolimus- or Paclitaxel-Eluting Stents J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., October 3, 2006; 48(7): 1304 - 1309. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. W. Serruys Fourth Annual American College of Cardiology International Lecture: A Journey in the Interventional Field J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., May 2, 2006; 47(9): 1754 - 1768. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. Wessely, A. Schomig, and A. Kastrati Sirolimus and Paclitaxel on Polymer-Based Drug-Eluting Stents: Similar But Different J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., February 21, 2006; 47(4): 708 - 714. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Mehilli, A. Kastrati, R. Wessely, A. Dibra, J. Hausleiter, B. Jaschke, J. Dirschinger, A. Schomig, and for the Intracoronary Stenting and Angiographic Re Randomized Trial of a Nonpolymer-Based Rapamycin-Eluting Stent Versus a Polymer-Based Paclitaxel-Eluting Stent for the Reduction of Late Lumen Loss Circulation, January 17, 2006; 113(2): 273 - 279. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Schomig, A. Kastrati, and R. Wessely Prevention of Restenosis by Systemic Drug Therapy: Back to the Future? Circulation, November 1, 2005; 112(18): 2759 - 2761. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||





