Skip Navigation


European Heart Journal Advance Access originally published online on June 23, 2005
European Heart Journal 2005 26(20):2148-2153; doi:10.1093/eurheartj/ehi385
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
26/20/2148    most recent
ehi385v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (3)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kaehler, J.
Right arrow Articles by Hamm, C. W.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Kaehler, J.
Right arrow Articles by Hamm, C. W.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The European Society of Cardiology 2005. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

13-year follow-up of the German angioplasty bypass surgery investigation

Jan Kaehler1,*, Ralf Koester1, Wibke Billmann1, Christian Schroeder1, Hans-Jürgen Rupprecht2, Thomas Ischinger3, Roland Jahns4, Albrecht Vogt5, Martin Lampen6, Rainer Hoffmann7, Reimer Riessen8, Joachim Berger9, Thomas Meinertz1 and Christian W. Hamm10

1Department of Cardiology, University Hospital Hamburg, Martinistrasse 52, 20246 Hamburg, Germany
2Department of Cardiology, Klinikum Rüsselsheim, Germany
3Department of Cardiology, Klinikum Bogenhausen, Munich, Germany
4Department of Cardiology, University Hospital Würzburg, Germany
5Department of Cardiology, Burgfeld Hospital, Kassel, Germany
6Department of Cardiology, German Heart Center Munich, Germany
7Department of Cardiology, University Hospital Aachen, Germany
8Department of Cardiology, University Hospital Tübingen, Germany
9Institute for Medical Biometrics and Epidemiology, University Hospital Hamburg, Germany
10Department of Cardiology, Kerckhoff Heart Center, Bad Nauheim, Germany

Received 14 July 2004; revised 30 April 2005; accepted 2 June 2005; online publish-ahead-of-print 23 June 2005.

* Corresponding author. Tel: +49 40 42803 4242; fax: +49 40 42803 8953. E-mail address: kaehler{at}uke.uni-hamburg.de

Aims The German Angioplasty Bypass Surgery Investigation was designed to compare symptomatic efficacy and safety of percutaneous coronary balloon angioplasty (PTCA) with coronary artery bypass surgery (CABG) in patients with symptomatic multi-vessel disease. This follow-up study was performed to determine the long-term outcome of patients following these interventions.

Methods and results From 1986 to 1991, 359 patients with angina CCS class II–IV, age below 75 years, and coronary multi-vessel disease requiring revascularization of at least two major coronary vessels were recruited at eight German centres and randomized to PTCA or CABG. From 337 patients undergoing the planned procedure, 324 patients could be followed-up (96%). Baseline parameters were identical in both groups, 2.2±0.6 vessels were treated in CABG patients, whereas 1.9±0.5 vessels were treated in PTCA patients. Thirty-seven per cent of surgical patients received internal mammary artery grafts, while no stents were used in patients undergoing PTCA. At the end of the 13-year follow-up period, the degree of angina, the degree of dyspnea, and the utilization of nitrates were comparable in both groups. With a total number of 76 deaths, Kaplan–Meier analysis revealed a comparable distribution in both groups. Although time to first re-intervention was significantly shorter in the PTCA group, P<0.001, frequencies of re-intervention (CABG, n=94; PTCA, n=136) and crossover rates (CABG to PTCA, n=49; PTCA to CABG, n=51) were comparable in both groups.

Conclusion The results of our 13-year follow-up suggest that in patients with symptomatic multi-vessel disease, both PTCA and CABG are associated with a comparable long-term survival and symptomatic efficacy. How far these results may be altered by developments such as drug-eluting stents or off-pump surgery remains to be determined.

Key Words: Coronary artery disease • Percutaneous coronary balloon angioplasty • Coronary artery bypass surgery • Long-term follow-up • Survival • Symptomatic efficacy


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
ANN INTERN MEDHome page
D. M. Bravata, A. L. Gienger, K. M. McDonald, V. Sundaram, M. V. Perez, R. Varghese, J. R. Kapoor, R. Ardehali, D. K. Owens, and M. A. Hlatky
Systematic Review: The Comparative Effectiveness of Percutaneous Coronary Interventions and Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery
Ann Intern Med, November 20, 2007; 147(10): 703 - 716.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JAMAHome page
D. T. Mangano, Y. Miao, A. Vuylsteke, I. C. Tudor, R. Juneja, D. Filipescu, A. Hoeft, M. L. Fontes, Z. Hillel, E. Ott, et al.
Mortality Associated With Aprotinin During 5 Years Following Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery
JAMA, February 7, 2007; 297(5): 471 - 479.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.