Skip Navigation


European Heart Journal Advance Access originally published online on November 22, 2005
European Heart Journal 2006 27(4):384-385; doi:10.1093/eurheartj/ehi665
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
27/4/384    most recent
ehi665v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Related articles in EHJ
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (1)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Nevelsteen, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Nevelsteen, A.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The European Society of Cardiology 2005. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

Endovascular treatment for thoracic aortic dissection: the better solution?

André Nevelsteen*

Department of Vascular Surgery, University Hospital Gasthuisberg, Herestraat 49, Leuven, Belgium

* Corresponding author. Tel: +32 16 344 339; fax: +32 16 344 616. E-mail address: andre.nevelsteen@eurheartj.org

This editorial refers to ‘Endovascular stent–graft placement in aortic dissection: a meta-analysis’{dagger} by H. Eggebrecht et al., on page 489

The first 10% of the full text of this article appears below.

The article of Eggebrecht et al.,1 might provide an important insight into the actual discussion on the preferred treatment for descending thoracic aortic dissection (Stanford type B). Indeed, treatment of descending aortic dissection continues indeed to be a challenge. What we do know for sure is that open surgery, particularly when performed under emergency conditions,2 remains associated with considerable mortality and morbidity rates. On the other hand, the ‘optimal’ medical treatment—the treatment of choice in the overwhelming majority of patients—has also been recognized to result in a far from attractive long-term prognosis.3

Eggebrecht et al. present a meta-analysis on endovascular prosthetic treatment of Stanford type B dissection for the period 1999–2004. Based on . . . [Full Text of this Article]


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?

Related articles in EHJ:

Endovascular stent–graft placement in aortic dissection: a meta-analysis
Holger Eggebrecht, Christoph A. Nienaber, Markus Neuhäuser, Dietrich Baumgart, Stephan Kische, Axel Schmermund, Ulf Herold, Tim C. Rehders, Heinz G. Jakob, and Raimund Erbel
EHJ 2006 27: 489-498. [Abstract] [Full Text]  



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
L. G. Svensson, N. T. Kouchoukos, D. C. Miller, J. E. Bavaria, J. S. Coselli, M. A. Curi, H. Eggebrecht, J. A. Elefteriades, R. Erbel, T. G. Gleason, et al.
Expert Consensus Document on the Treatment of Descending Thoracic Aortic Disease Using Endovascular Stent-Grafts
Ann. Thorac. Surg., January 1, 2008; 85(1_Supplement): S1 - S41.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 CirculationHome page
T. T. Tsai, R. Fattori, S. Trimarchi, E. Isselbacher, T. Myrmel, A. Evangelista, S. Hutchison, U. Sechtem, J. V. Cooper, D. E. Smith, et al.
Long-Term Survival in Patients Presenting With Type B Acute Aortic Dissection: Insights From the International Registry of Acute Aortic Dissection
Circulation, November 21, 2006; 114(21): 2226 - 2231.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]