European Heart Journal Advance Access originally published online on November 30, 2005
European Heart Journal 2006 27(4):460-468; doi:10.1093/eurheartj/ehi666
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Rapid online quantification of left ventricular volume from real-time three-dimensional echocardiographic data
1Noninvasive Cardiac Imaging Laboratory, University of Chicago Hospitals, 5841 S. Maryland Avenue, MC 5084, Chicago, IL 60637, USA
2Philips Medical Systems, Andover, MA, USA
3Department of Radiology, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA
4Philips Medical Systems, Paris, France
5University Clinic San Carlos, Madrid, Spain
Received 20 July 2005; revised 24 October 2005; accepted 3 November 2005; online publish-ahead-of-print 30 November 2005.
* Corresponding author. Tel: +1 773 702 1842; fax: +1 773 702 1034. E-mail address: rlang{at}medicine.bsd.uchicago.edu
Aims Determination of left ventricular (LV) volumes and ejection fraction (EF) from two-dimensional echocardiographic (2DE) images is subjective, time-consuming, and relatively inaccurate because of foreshortened views and the use of geometric assumptions. Our aims were (1) to validate a new method for rapid, online measurement of LV volumes from real-time three-dimensional echocardiographic (RT3DE) data using cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) as the reference and (2) to compare its accuracy and reproducibility with standard 2DE measurements.
Methods and results CMR, 2DE, and RT3DE datasets were obtained in 50 patients. End-systolic and end-diastolic volumes (ESV and EDV) were calculated from the 2DE images using biplane method of disks. ES and ED RT3DE datasets were analysed using prototype software designed to automatically detect the endocardial surface using a deformable shell model and calculate ESV and EDV from voxel counts. 2DE and RT3DE-derived volumes were compared with CMR (linear regression, BlandAltman analysis). In most patients, analysis of RT3DE data required <2 min per patient. RT3DE measurements correlated highly with CMR (r: 0.96, 0.97, and 0.93 for EDV, ESV, and EF, respectively) with small biases (14 mL, 6.5 mL, 1%) and narrow limits of agreement (SD: 17 mL, 16 mL, 6.4%). 2DE measurements correlated less well with CMR (r: 0.89, 0.92, 0.86) with greater biases (23 mL, 15 mL, 1%) and wider limits of agreement (SD: 29 mL, 24 mL, 9.5%). RT3DE resulted in lower intra-observer (EDV: 7.9 vs. 23%; ESV: 7.6 vs. 26%) and inter-observer variability (EDV: 11 vs. 26%; ESV: 13 vs. 31%).
Conclusion Semi-automated detection of the LV endocardial surface from RT3DE data is suitable for clinical use because it allows rapid, accurate, and reproducible measurements of LV volumes, superior to conventional 2DE methods.
Key Words: Echocardiography Magnetic resonance Ventricular function Ejection fraction
![]()
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
W.-J. Flu, J.-P. van Kuijk, J. J. Bax, J. Gorcsan III, and D. Poldermans Three-dimensional speckle tracking echocardiography: a novel approach in the assessment of left ventricular volume and function? Eur. Heart J., October 1, 2009; 30(19): 2304 - 2307. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Ren, J.-W. Tian, X.-P. Leng, H.-M. Wang, Y. Wang, and Z.-Z. Wang Assessment of Global and Regional Left Ventricular Function After Surgical Revascularization in Patients With Coronary Artery Disease by Real-time Triplane Echocardiography J. Ultrasound Med., September 1, 2009; 28(9): 1175 - 1184. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H.-J. Nesser, V. Mor-Avi, W. Gorissen, L. Weinert, R. Steringer-Mascherbauer, J. Niel, L. Sugeng, and R. M. Lang Quantification of left ventricular volumes using three-dimensional echocardiographic speckle tracking: comparison with MRI Eur. Heart J., July 1, 2009; 30(13): 1565 - 1573. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
V. Delgado, J. J. Bax, and E. E. van der Wall Towards assessment of left ventricular mechanics in true three dimensions Eur. Heart J., July 1, 2009; 30(13): 1554 - 1555. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. Ballo, A. Motto, S. Mondillo, and M. Galderisi Three-dimensional echocardiography for optimization of cardiac resynchronization therapy Eur. Heart J., February 2, 2009; 30(4): 505 - 505. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. Stanton, N. M. Hawkins, K. J. Hogg, N. E.R. Goodfield, M. C. Petrie, and J. J.V. McMurray Three-dimensional echocardiography for optimization of cardiac resynchronization therapy: reply Eur. Heart J., February 2, 2009; 30(4): 505 - 506. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
V. Mor-Avi, L. Sugeng, and R. M. Lang Real-Time 3-Dimensional Echocardiography: An Integral Component of the Routine Echocardiographic Examination in Adult Patients? Circulation, January 20, 2009; 119(2): 314 - 329. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. Nishikage, H. Nakai, V. Mor-Avi, R. M. Lang, I. S. Salgo, S. H. Settlemier, S. Husson, and M. Takeuchi Quantitative assessment of left ventricular volume and ejection fraction using two-dimensional speckle tracking echocardiography Eur J Echocardiogr, January 1, 2009; 10(1): 82 - 88. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. Sugeng, V. Mor-Avi, and R. M Lang Three-dimensional echocardiography: coming of age Heart, September 1, 2008; 94(9): 1123 - 1125. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A-C Pouleur, J-B le Polain de Waroux, A Pasquet, B L Gerber, O Gerard, P Allain, and J-L J Vanoverschelde Assessment of left ventricular mass and volumes by three-dimensional echocardiography in patients with or without wall motion abnormalities: comparison against cine magnetic resonance imaging Heart, August 1, 2008; 94(8): 1050 - 1057. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. L. Gutierrez-Chico, J. L. Zamorano, E. Prieto-Moriche, R. A. Hernandez-Antolin, M. Bravo-Amaro, L. Perez de Isla, M. Sanmartin-Fernandez, J. A. Baz-Alonso, and A. Iniguez-Romo Real-time three-dimensional echocardiography in aortic stenosis: a novel, simple, and reliable method to improve accuracy in area calculation Eur. Heart J., May 2, 2008; 29(10): 1296 - 1306. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. Jenkins, M. Monaghan, G. Shirali, R. Guraraja, and T. H. Marwick An intensive interactive course for 3D echocardiography: is 'crop till you drop' an effective learning strategy? Eur J Echocardiogr, May 1, 2008; 9(3): 373 - 380. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J L Hare, C Jenkins, S Nakatani, A Ogawa, C-M Yu, and T H Marwick Feasibility and clinical decision-making with 3D echocardiography in routine practice Heart, April 1, 2008; 94(4): 440 - 445. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. N. Kirkpatrick, M. A. Vannan, J. Narula, and R. M. Lang Echocardiography in Heart Failure: Applications, Utility, and New Horizons J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., July 31, 2007; 50(5): 381 - 396. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. Jenkins, J. Chan, K. Bricknell, M. Strudwick, and T. H. Marwick Reproducibility of Right Ventricular Volumes and Ejection Fraction Using Real-time Three-Dimensional Echocardiography: Comparison With Cardiac MRI Chest, June 1, 2007; 131(6): 1844 - 1851. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. M. Lang, V. Mor-Avi, L. Sugeng, P. S. Nieman, and D. J. Sahn Three-Dimensional Echocardiography: The Benefits of the Additional Dimension J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., November 21, 2006; 48(10): 2053 - 2069. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||






