Skip Navigation


European Heart Journal Advance Access originally published online on May 15, 2007
European Heart Journal 2007 28(12):1425-1432; doi:10.1093/eurheartj/ehm082
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
28/12/1425    most recent
ehm082v1
Right arrow E-letters: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when E-letters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Related articles in EHJ
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (3)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Weidemann, F.
Right arrow Articles by Strotmann, J. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Weidemann, F.
Right arrow Articles by Strotmann, J. M.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The European Society of Cardiology 2007. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

Assessment of the contractile reserve in patients with intermediate coronary lesions: a strain rate imaging study validated by invasive myocardial fractional flow reserve

Frank Weidemann*,{dagger}, Philip Jung, Caroline Hoyer, Jens Broscheit, Wolfram Voelker, Georg Ertl, Stefan Störk, Christiane E. Angermann and Joerg M. Strotmann

Medical Clinic I/Center of Cardiovascular Disease, University of Würzburg, Josef-Schneider Str. 2, D 20, 97080 Würzburg, Germany

Received 22 August 2006; revised 1 March 2007; accepted 8 March 2007; online publish-ahead-of-print 15 May 2007.

* Corresponding author. Tel: +49 931 2010; fax: +49 931 20136291. E-mail address: weidemann_f{at}medizin.uni-wuerzburg.de

See page 1407 for the editorial comment on this article (doi:10.1093/eurheartj/ehm166)

Aims: The present study aims to compare the change of left ventricular deformation during dobutamine stress echocardiography (DSE) with the reference standard of invasive myocardial fractional flow reserve (FFR) to assess the haemodynamic significance of intermediate coronary lesions.

Methods and results: In 30 patients with an intermediate coronary artery stenosis in one epicardial coronary artery, FFR measurements were performed during coronary catheterization. In case of an FFR < 0.75 after intracoronary adenosine administration, the stenosis was considered significant, indicating ischaemia. In addition, during DSE, peak systolic strain rate and systolic strain of the region of interest (supplied by the stenotic vessel) and of a non-ischaemic remote region were assessed at baseline and at peak stress. Thirteen patients had an FFR ≥ 0.75, indicating normal flow reserve (non-ischaemic group). The remaining 17 patients with an FFR < 0.75 comprised the ischaemic group. At baseline DSE, mean values of strain rate (–1.2 ± 0.3 s–1) and strain (–17 ± 8%) were not significantly different between both groups. In the ischaemic group, in the target region, strain at peak stress decreased to – 10 ± 8%, whereas strain rate remained unchanged. In contrast, in the non-ischaemic group, strain at peak stress remained unchanged (–18 ± 7%), whereas strain rate increased to – 2.5 ± 1.1 s–1. The receiver operating characteristic curve analysis revealed the change in strain rate as the best parameter to detect ischaemia, with a sensitivity of 89% and a specificity of 86%. In the remote region, in both groups, strain rate (–1.4 ± 0.4 s–1) and strain values (–20 ± 7%) were not significantly different at baseline, and strain rate doubled and strain remained unchanged at DSE peak stress.

Conclusion: Non-invasive evaluation of regional deformation, using strain rate imaging during DSE, predicted the relevance of intermediate coronary stenosis. In this context, strain rate is superior to strain measurements for the quantification of the contractile reserve.

Key Words: Intermediate stenosis • Strain rate imaging • Fractional flow reserve

{dagger} The first two authors contributed equally to this study.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?

Related articles in EHJ:

Straining to detect ischaemia
Thomas H. Marwick
EHJ 2007 28: 1407-1408. [Extract] [FREE Full Text]  



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Eur J EchocardiogrHome page
R.A. Argyle and S.G. Ray
Stress and strain: double trouble or useful tool?
Eur J Echocardiogr, August 1, 2009; 10(6): 716 - 722.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Circ Cardiovasc ImagingHome page
G. Korosoglou, D. Lossnitzer, D. Schellberg, A. Lewien, A. Wochele, T. Schaeufele, M. Neizel, H. Steen, E. Giannitsis, H. A. Katus, et al.
Strain-Encoded Cardiac MRI as an Adjunct for Dobutamine Stress Testing: Incremental Value to Conventional Wall Motion Analysis
Circ Cardiovasc Imaging, March 1, 2009; 2(2): 132 - 140.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Eur Heart JHome page
P. H. Jung, J. Rieber, S. Stork, C. Hoyer, I. Erhardt, A. Nowotny, W. Voelker, F. Weidemann, G. Ertl, V. Klauss, et al.
Effect of contrast application on interpretability and diagnostic value of dobutamine stress echocardiography in patients with intermediate coronary lesions: comparison with myocardial fractional flow reserve
Eur. Heart J., October 2, 2008; 29(20): 2536 - 2543.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 J Am Coll CardiolHome page
L. A. Pierard
Echocardiographic Monitoring Throughout Exercise: Better Than the Post-Treadmill Approach?
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., November 6, 2007; 50(19): 1864 - 1866.
[Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Eur Heart JHome page
T. H. Marwick
Straining to detect ischaemia
Eur. Heart J., June 2, 2007; 28(12): 1407 - 1408.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.