Skip Navigation


European Heart Journal Advance Access originally published online on October 11, 2007
European Heart Journal 2007 28(24):2985-2991; doi:10.1093/eurheartj/ehm428
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
28/24/2985    most recent
ehm428v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Related articles in EHJ
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (1)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Eskola, M. J.
Right arrow Articles by Clemmensen, P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Eskola, M. J.
Right arrow Articles by Clemmensen, P.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Published on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology. All rights reserved. © The Author 2007. For permissions please email: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

The electrocardiographic window of opportunity to treat vs. the different evolving stages of ST-elevation myocardial infarction: correlation with therapeutic approach, coronary anatomy, and outcome in the DANAMI-2 trial

Markku J. Eskola1,*, Lene Holmvang2, Kjell C. Nikus1, Samuel Sclarovsky3, Hans-Henrik Tilsted4, Heini Huhtala5, Kari O. Niemelä1 and Peter Clemmensen2

1 Department of Cardiology, Heart Center, Tampere University Hospital, Biokatu 6, PO Box 2000, 33520 Tampere, Finland
2 Department of Cardiology B, Heart Centre, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark
3 Procardia Medical Center, Tel Aviv, Israel
4 Department of Cardiology, Aalborg University Hospital, Aalborg, Denmark
5 School of Public Health, University of Tampere, Tampere, Finland

Received 31 March 2007; revised 17 August 2007; accepted 31 August 2007; online publish-ahead-of-print 11 October 2007.

* Corresponding author. Tel: +358 3 311 66080; fax: +358 3 311 64157. E-mail address: markku.eskola{at}pshp.fi

See page 2957 for the editorial comment on this article (doi:10.1093/eurheartj/ehm512)

Aims: The aim of the study was to assess two distinct 12-lead electrocardiogram (ECG) patterns and their prognostic value with respect to reperfusion strategy.

Methods and results: In a DANAMI-2 substudy (n = 1522), we defined the pre-infarction syndrome (PIS) as ST-elevation accompanied by positive T waves and evolving myocardial infarction (EMI) as pathological Q waves and/or negative T wave. We used a composite of death, clinical re-infarction, or disabling stroke at median 2.7 year follow-up. A higher overall event rate was observed in the EMI group compared with the PIS group [11.4 (9.4–13.9) and 6.9 (6.0–8.0) per 100 person-years, respectively, ratio of the rate (RR) 1.6, P < 0.001]. The EMI pattern was independently predictive of adverse outcome in multivariable analysis (hazard ratio 1.52, confidence interval 1.01–2.30, P = 0.04). The PIS pattern (n = 952) was associated with lower overall event rate in patients treated with primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) compared with fibrinolytic therapy (FT) [5.5 (4.4–6.9) and 8.5 (7.0–10.4) per 100 person-years, respectively, RR = 0.6, P = 0.004]. No significant difference in the outcome between treatment strategies was observed in the EMI group as a whole. However, in patients with anterior EMI without ECG signs of reperfusion, superiority of primary PCI was driven by a 51% reduction in the relative risk of composite endpoint (P = 0.008).

Conclusion: More detailed ECG analysis, involving also Q- and T-wave morphology, is useful for rapid identification of high-risk patients in whom every effort should be made to transfer for primary PCI, or vice versa, for identifying low-risk patients in whom FT might be an alternative option.

Key Words: Myocardial infarction • Electrocardiogram • Percutaneous coronary intervention • Fibrinolysis • Risk stratification • Prognosis


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?

Related articles in EHJ:

Use of the electrocardiogram in optimizing reperfusion for ST-elevation myocardial infarction: a new role for an old tool?
Christos Kasapis and Brahmajee K. Nallamothu
EHJ 2007 28: 2957-2959. [Extract] [Full Text]  



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Eur Heart JHome page
C. Kasapis and B. K. Nallamothu
Use of the electrocardiogram in optimizing reperfusion for ST-elevation myocardial infarction: a new role for an old tool?
Eur. Heart J., December 2, 2007; 28(24): 2957 - 2959.
[Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.