European Heart Journal Advance Access originally published online on October 23, 2008
European Heart Journal 2008 29(23):2886-2893; doi:10.1093/eurheartj/ehn461
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Transvenous removal of pacing and implantable cardiac defibrillating leads using single sheath mechanical dilatation and multiple venous approaches: high success rate and safety in more than 2000 leads
Arrhythmology Unit of CardioVascular Division, CardioThoracic Department, University Hospital, Via Paradisa 2, 56100 Pisa, Italy
Received 19 November 2007; revised 19 September 2008; accepted 29 September 2008; online publish-ahead-of-print 23 October 2008.
* Corresponding author. Tel: +39 050995333, Fax: +39 050995329, Email: m.g.bongiorni{at}med.unipi.it
Aims: The aim of the present study was to describe a 10 years single-centre experience in pacing and defibrillating leads removal using an effective and safe modified mechanical dilatation technique.
Methods and results: We developed a single mechanical dilating sheath extraction technique with multiple venous entry site approaches. We performed a venous entry site approach (VEA) in cases of exposed leads and an alternative transvenous femoral approach (TFA) combined with an internal transjugular approach (ITA) in the presence of very tight binding sites causing failure of VEA extraction or in cases of free-floating leads. We attempted to remove 2062 leads [1825 pacing and 237 implantable cardiac defibrillating (ICD) leads; 1989 exposed at the venous entry site and 73 free-floating] in 1193 consecutive patients. The VEA was effective in 1799 leads, the TFA in 28, and the ITA in 205; in the overall population, we completely removed 2032 leads (98.4%), partially removed 18 (0.9%), and failed to remove 12 leads (0.6%). Major complications were observed in eight patients (0.7%), causing three deaths (0.3%).
Conclusion: Mechanical single sheath extraction technique with multiple venous entry site approaches is effective, safe, and with a good cost effective profile for pacing and ICD leads removal.
Key Words: Lead extraction Mechanical dilatation Internal jugular approach
![]()
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
G. M. Calvagna, R. Evola, G. Scardace, and S. Valsecchi Single-operator experience with a mechanical approach for removal of pacing and implantable defibrillator leads Europace, November 1, 2009; 11(11): 1505 - 1509. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. Kennergren, C. Bjurman, R. Wiklund, and J. Gabel A single-centre experience of over one thousand lead extractions Europace, May 1, 2009; 11(5): 612 - 617. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
