Skip Navigation


European Heart Journal Advance Access originally published online on March 1, 2008
European Heart Journal 2008 29(6):816-824; doi:10.1093/eurheartj/ehn048
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
29/6/816    most recent
ehn048v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (1)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Pang, P. S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Pang, P. S.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Published on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology. All rights reserved. © The Author 2008. For permissions please email: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

A proposal to standardize dyspnoea measurement in clinical trials of acute heart failure syndromes: the need for a uniform approach

Peter S. Pang1, John G.F. Cleland2,*, John R. Teerlink3, Sean P. Collins4, Christopher J. Lindsell4, George Sopko5, W. Frank Peacock6, Gregg C. Fonarow7, Amer Z. Aldeen1, J. Douglas Kirk8, Alan B. Storrow9, Miguel Tavares10, Alexandre Mebazaa11, Edmond Roland12, Barry M. Massie3, Alan S. Maisel13, Michel Komajda14,15, Gerasimos Filippatos16, Mihai Gheorghiade for the Acute Heart Failure Syndromes International Working Group17

1 Department of Emergency Medicine, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA
2 Department of Cardiology, Castle Hill Hospital, University of Hull, Kingston-upon-Hull, UK
3 Section of Cardiology, San Francisco Veterans Affairs Medical Center and School of Medicine, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
4 Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH, USA
5 National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA
6 Department of Emergency Medicine, The Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA
7 Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, University of California Los Angeles, CA, USA
8 Department of Emergency Medicine, University of California, Davis, Medical Center, Sacramento, CA, USA
9 Department of Emergency Medicine, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA
10 Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care, Hospital Geral de Santo António, Porto, Portugal
11 Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, Hopital Lariboisiere, Paris, France
12 Agence Francaise de Securite Sanitaire des Produits de Sante, Paris, France
13 Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Veterans Affairs San Diego Health Care System, University of California San Diego, San Diego, CA, USA
14 Department of Cardiology, University Pierre Marie Curie, Paris, France
15 Pitie Salpetriere Hospital, Paris, France
16 Department of Cardiology, Heart Failure Unit, Athens University Hospital, Attikon, Greece
17 Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA

Received 26 July 2007; revised 13 January 2008; accepted 17 January 2008; online publish-ahead-of-print 1 March 2008.

* Corresponding author. Tel: +44 1482 624 084, Fax: +44 1482 624 085, Email address: j.g.cleland{at}hull.ac.uk

Dyspnoea is the most common presenting symptom amongst patients with acute heart failure syndromes (AHFS). It is distressing to patients and therefore an important target for treatment in clinical practice, clinical trials, and for regulatory approval of novel agents. Despite its importance as a treatment target, no consensus exists on how to assess dyspnoea in this setting. There is a considerable uncertainty about the reproducibility of the various instruments used to measure dyspnoea, their ability to reflect changes in symptoms and whether they accurately reflect the patient’s experience. Little attempt has been made to ensure consistent implementation with respect to patients’ posture during assessment or timing in relationship to therapy. There is also limited understanding of how rapidly and completely dyspnoea responds to standard therapy. A standardized method with which to assess dyspnoea is required for clinical trials of AHFS in order to ensure uniform collection of data on a key endpoint. We propose the Provocative Dyspnoea Assessment, a method of measurement that combines sequential dyspnoea provocation by positioning and walking with a dyspnoea self assessment using a five-point Likert scale, to yield a final Dyspnoea Severity Score. This proposed tool requires detailed validation but has face validity for the uniform assessment of dyspnoea.

Key Words: Heart failure • Clinical trials • Dyspnoea


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.