Skip Navigation

European Heart Journal 1984 5(1):21-26;
Copyright © 1984 by the European Society of Cardiology.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by WENNERBLOM, B.
Right arrow Articles by HOLMBERG, S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by WENNERBLOM, B.
Right arrow Articles by HOLMBERG, S.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© 1984 The European Society of Cardiology

Resuscitation of patients in cardiac arrest outside hospital. Comparison of two different organizations of mobile coronary care in one community

B. WENNERBLOM, L. EKSTRÖM and S. HOLMBERG

Department of Cardiology, Sahlgrenska Hospital Gothenburg, Sweden

Received 28 February 1983; revised 29 June 1983; .

Requests for reprints to B. Wannerblom

Abstract

We have compared the effectiveness of two different mobile coronary care systems with regard to mortality from cardiac arrest (CA) outside hospital in Gothenburg, Sweden.In period 1, the mobile coronary care unit (MCCU) was part of a randomized study of the effect of an MCCU versus standard ambulances on early mortality from ischaemic heart disease. The MCCU was single, hospital based and manned by two CCU nurses and two ambulance drivers. The organization ran on workdays 08.00 a.m. to 17.00p.m. from October, 1973 to May, 1978, corresponding to twelve months of effective lime. One-year data for the MCCU have been calculated by extrapolating to a 100% allocation to the MCCU.In period 2, from November, 1980, through December, 1981, also corresponding to twelve months of effective time, the system was reorganized to a mobile intensive care unit (MICU) manned by paramedics 24 h all days of the week, and part of the time by CCU nurses. The MICU was dispatched to all suspected emergencies and the treatment capacity was defibrillation, endotracheal intubation and, part of the time, drugs. Simultaneously with the MICU, the nearest standard ambulance was dispatched and the first crew to arrive started cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR).Comparing the extrapolated data from period 1 with the exact data from period 2, there was an increase in period 2 of dispatches to subjects in CA due to heart disease from 59 to 181. The retrieval of subjects in ventricular fibrillation (VF) increased from 20 to 87 as a result of reduced delay times from the collapse to alarm, start of CPR and defibrillation. The number of patients less than 75 years old, discharged alive from hospital increased from 6 to 19.In subjects retrieved in VF in period 2, 43% survived if CPR was started within 5 min and 7% if CPR was delayed more than 5 min. 56% of the cases received CPR within 5 min and defibrillation within 8 min and 50% of them survived, but if defibrillation was delayed more than 8 min, only 14% survived.In conclusion the reorganization of an MCCU system from a single, hospital based MCCU manned by CCU nurses and ambulance drivers to a decentralized rapid response system with paramedics was associated with an improvement from 6 to 19 survivors, less than 75 years old, in one year.

Key Words: Acute myocardial infarction • resucritation • MCCU • MICU • cardiac arrest


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Eur Heart J SupplHome page
D Baller, J Vogt, O Lindner, B Lamp, J Holzinger, A Kammeier, P Wielepp, W Burchert, and D Horstkotte
Myocardial oxygen consumption and perfusion before and after cardiac resynchronization therapy: experimental observations and clinical implications
Eur. Heart J. Suppl., August 1, 2004; 6(suppl_D): D91 - D97.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.