European Heart Journal Advance Access published online on December 6, 2004
European Heart Journal, doi:10.1093/eurheartj/ehi059
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1 Institute of Internal Medicine and Cardiology, University of Florence, Viale Morgagni 85, 50134 Florence, Italy
* To whom correspondence should be addressed. Aims Several studies have tested non-pharmacological therapies for atrial tachyarrhythmias (ATs) by measuring the cumulative time (burden) the patient spends in arrhythmia. Contradictory results questioned either therapy efficacy or statistical power of the trials. We studied AT burden variability in patients paced for sinus node disease (SND) in order to interpret currently published data appropriately and to evaluate reliable sample sizes. Methods and results One hundred and five patients with AT and SND received a dual chamber pacemaker with antitachyarrhythmia-pacing capability, and were followed for 13 months. Seventy-eight patients (74%) suffered AT recurrences. Device-gathered diagnostic measures were used to simulate results of randomized studies both with crossover and parallel design. The sample size required for statistically significant results was calculated as a function of the expected therapy-induced burden reduction. AT burden intra-patient variability was high: 43% of patients showed intrinsic fluctuations hiding any therapy-induced burden reduction lower than 30%. Demonstrating therapeutic breakthrough through a 6 month study would require 290 patients with crossover design and 5800 patients with parallel design. Doubling the study period requires 400 and 3000 patients, respectively. Conclusion Patients with AT and paced for SND showed high intra-patient burden variability, which could possibly hide an AT burden reduction induced by a therapy. Previous studies involving non-pharmacological therapies utilizing AT burden endpoints could lack the power to reach statistical significance.
Clinical research
Temporal variability of atrial tachyarrhythmia burden in bradycardia-tachycardia syndrome patients
2 Institute of Cardiology, S.Filippo Neri Hospital, Rome, Italy
3 Institute of Cardiology, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy
4 Institute of Cardiology, S.Anna Hospital, Como, Italy
5 Institute of Cardiology, Civile Hospital, Piacenza, Italy
6 Institute of Cardiology, S.Luigi-S.Currò Hospital, Catania, Italy
7 Institute of Cardiology, Villa Tiberia Hospital, Rome, Italy
8 Medtronic Inc., Minneapolis, MN, USA
9 Medtronic Italy, Milan, Italy
Luigi Padeletti, E-mail: lpadeletti{at}interfree.it
![]()
Abstract ![]()
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
R. P. Ricci, L. Morichelli, and M. Santini Remote control of implanted devices through Home MonitoringTM technology improves detection and clinical management of atrial fibrillation Europace, January 1, 2009; 11(1): 54 - 61. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. E.W. Hemels, J. H. Ruiter, G. P. Molhoek, N. J.G.M. Veeger, A. C.P. Wiesfeld, A. V. Ranchor, M. van Trigt, A. Pilmeyer, I. C. Van Gelder, and for The Features in AT500TM study; Chances for pat Right atrial preventive and antitachycardia pacing for prevention of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation in patients without bradycardia: a randomized study Europace, March 1, 2008; 10(3): 306 - 313. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. Mont, R. Ruiz-Granell, J. G. Martinez, J. R. Carmona, M. Fidalgo, E. Cobo, M. Riera, X. Navarro, and on behalf of the Prevention or Termination (POT) S Impact of anti-tachycardia pacing on atrial fibrillation burden when added on top of preventive pacing algorithms: results of the prevention or termination (POT) trial Europace, January 1, 2008; 10(1): 28 - 34. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. W. Israel Studying atrial fibrillation: what can we learn from the AFTherapy study? Europace, December 1, 2007; 9(12): 1107 - 1109. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. W. Israel What is the role of the pacing rate in the prevention of atrial tachyarrhythmias? Europace, November 1, 2007; 9(11): 999 - 1001. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
N. Sulke, J. Silberbauer, L. Boodhoo, N. Freemantle, K. Kamalvand, S. O'Nunain, D. Hildick-Smith, G. W. Lloyd, N. R. Patel, and V. Paul The use of atrial overdrive and ventricular rate stabilization pacing algorithms for the prevention and treatment of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation: the Pacemaker Atrial Fibrillation Suppression (PAFS) study Europace, September 1, 2007; 9(9): 790 - 797. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
W. de Voogt, N. van Hemel, P. de Vusser, G. H. Mairesse, R. van Mechelen, J. Koistinen, A. van den Bos, I. Roose, J. Voitk, S. Yli-Mayry, et al. No evidence of automatic atrial overdrive pacing efficacy on reduction of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation Europace, September 1, 2007; 9(9): 798 - 804. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Gulizia, S. Mangiameli, S. Orazi, G. Chiaranda, G. Boriani, G. Piccione, N. DiGiovanni, A. Colletti, C. Puntrello, G. Butera, et al. Randomized comparison between Ramp and Burst+ atrial antitachycardia pacing therapies in patients suffering from sinus node disease and atrial fibrillation and implanted with a DDDRP device Europace, July 1, 2006; 8(7): 465 - 473. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. Azzolini, G. Critelli, V. De Giorgi, G. B. Del Giudice, G. Ibba, D. Melissano, A. Scaccia, and A. Puglisi Atrial tachyarrhythmia burden modelling by some electrophysiological parameters in pacemaker-recipient patients with Brady-Tachy syndrome Europace, July 1, 2006; 8(7): 474 - 481. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
F. Drago, M. S. Silvetti, G. Grutter, and A. De Santis Long term management of atrial arrhythmias in young patients with sick sinus syndrome undergoing early operation to correct congenital heart disease Europace, July 1, 2006; 8(7): 488 - 494. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. Lewalter and B. Luderitz Atrial fibrillation: mortality, morbidity, and money; is that all? Importance and variability of burden measurement Eur. Heart J., January 2, 2005; 26(2): 110 - 111. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||

