Skip Navigation



European Heart Journal Advance Access published online on December 6, 2004

European Heart Journal, doi:10.1093/eurheartj/ehi059
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (Rapid PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
26/2/165    most recent
ehi059v1
Right arrow E-letters: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when E-letters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Padeletti, L.
Right arrow Articles by Grammatico, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Padeletti, L.
Right arrow Articles by Grammatico, A.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

European Heart Journal © The European Society of Cardiology 2004; all rights reserved.

Clinical research

Temporal variability of atrial tachyarrhythmia burden in bradycardia-tachycardia syndrome patients

Luigi Padeletti 1*, Massimo Santini 2, Giuseppe Boriani 3, GianLuca Botto 4, Alessandro Capucci 5, Michele Gulizia 6, Renato Ricci 2, Andrea Spampinato 7, Paolo Pieragnoli 1, Eduardo Warman 8, Marco Vimercati 9, and Andrea Grammatico 9

1 Institute of Internal Medicine and Cardiology, University of Florence, Viale Morgagni 85, 50134 Florence, Italy
2 Institute of Cardiology, S.Filippo Neri Hospital, Rome, Italy
3 Institute of Cardiology, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy
4 Institute of Cardiology, S.Anna Hospital, Como, Italy
5 Institute of Cardiology, Civile Hospital, Piacenza, Italy
6 Institute of Cardiology, S.Luigi-S.Currò Hospital, Catania, Italy
7 Institute of Cardiology, Villa Tiberia Hospital, Rome, Italy
8 Medtronic Inc., Minneapolis, MN, USA
9 Medtronic Italy, Milan, Italy

* To whom correspondence should be addressed.
Luigi Padeletti, E-mail: lpadeletti{at}interfree.it


   Abstract

Aims Several studies have tested non-pharmacological therapies for atrial tachyarrhythmias (ATs) by measuring the cumulative time (burden) the patient spends in arrhythmia. Contradictory results questioned either therapy efficacy or statistical power of the trials. We studied AT burden variability in patients paced for sinus node disease (SND) in order to interpret currently published data appropriately and to evaluate reliable sample sizes.

Methods and results One hundred and five patients with AT and SND received a dual chamber pacemaker with antitachyarrhythmia-pacing capability, and were followed for 13 months. Seventy-eight patients (74%) suffered AT recurrences. Device-gathered diagnostic measures were used to simulate results of randomized studies both with crossover and parallel design. The sample size required for statistically significant results was calculated as a function of the expected therapy-induced burden reduction. AT burden intra-patient variability was high: 43% of patients showed intrinsic fluctuations hiding any therapy-induced burden reduction lower than 30%. Demonstrating therapeutic breakthrough through a 6 month study would require 290 patients with crossover design and 5800 patients with parallel design. Doubling the study period requires 400 and 3000 patients, respectively.

Conclusion Patients with AT and paced for SND showed high intra-patient burden variability, which could possibly hide an AT burden reduction induced by a therapy. Previous studies involving non-pharmacological therapies utilizing AT burden endpoints could lack the power to reach statistical significance.

Keywords: Tachyarrhythmia; Atrial fibrillation; Non-pharmacological therapies; Pacing; Sample size; Trials.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
EuropaceHome page
R. P. Ricci, L. Morichelli, and M. Santini
Remote control of implanted devices through Home MonitoringTM technology improves detection and clinical management of atrial fibrillation
Europace, January 1, 2009; 11(1): 54 - 61.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
EuropaceHome page
M. E.W. Hemels, J. H. Ruiter, G. P. Molhoek, N. J.G.M. Veeger, A. C.P. Wiesfeld, A. V. Ranchor, M. van Trigt, A. Pilmeyer, I. C. Van Gelder, and for The Features in AT500TM study; Chances for pat
Right atrial preventive and antitachycardia pacing for prevention of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation in patients without bradycardia: a randomized study
Europace, March 1, 2008; 10(3): 306 - 313.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
EuropaceHome page
L. Mont, R. Ruiz-Granell, J. G. Martinez, J. R. Carmona, M. Fidalgo, E. Cobo, M. Riera, X. Navarro, and on behalf of the Prevention or Termination (POT) S
Impact of anti-tachycardia pacing on atrial fibrillation burden when added on top of preventive pacing algorithms: results of the prevention or termination (POT) trial
Europace, January 1, 2008; 10(1): 28 - 34.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
EuropaceHome page
C. W. Israel
Studying atrial fibrillation: what can we learn from the AFTherapy study?
Europace, December 1, 2007; 9(12): 1107 - 1109.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
EuropaceHome page
C. W. Israel
What is the role of the pacing rate in the prevention of atrial tachyarrhythmias?
Europace, November 1, 2007; 9(11): 999 - 1001.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
EuropaceHome page
N. Sulke, J. Silberbauer, L. Boodhoo, N. Freemantle, K. Kamalvand, S. O'Nunain, D. Hildick-Smith, G. W. Lloyd, N. R. Patel, and V. Paul
The use of atrial overdrive and ventricular rate stabilization pacing algorithms for the prevention and treatment of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation: the Pacemaker Atrial Fibrillation Suppression (PAFS) study
Europace, September 1, 2007; 9(9): 790 - 797.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
EuropaceHome page
W. de Voogt, N. van Hemel, P. de Vusser, G. H. Mairesse, R. van Mechelen, J. Koistinen, A. van den Bos, I. Roose, J. Voitk, S. Yli-Mayry, et al.
No evidence of automatic atrial overdrive pacing efficacy on reduction of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation
Europace, September 1, 2007; 9(9): 798 - 804.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
EuropaceHome page
M. Gulizia, S. Mangiameli, S. Orazi, G. Chiaranda, G. Boriani, G. Piccione, N. DiGiovanni, A. Colletti, C. Puntrello, G. Butera, et al.
Randomized comparison between Ramp and Burst+ atrial antitachycardia pacing therapies in patients suffering from sinus node disease and atrial fibrillation and implanted with a DDDRP device
Europace, July 1, 2006; 8(7): 465 - 473.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
EuropaceHome page
P. Azzolini, G. Critelli, V. De Giorgi, G. B. Del Giudice, G. Ibba, D. Melissano, A. Scaccia, and A. Puglisi
Atrial tachyarrhythmia burden modelling by some electrophysiological parameters in pacemaker-recipient patients with Brady-Tachy syndrome
Europace, July 1, 2006; 8(7): 474 - 481.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
EuropaceHome page
F. Drago, M. S. Silvetti, G. Grutter, and A. De Santis
Long term management of atrial arrhythmias in young patients with sick sinus syndrome undergoing early operation to correct congenital heart disease
Europace, July 1, 2006; 8(7): 488 - 494.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur Heart JHome page
T. Lewalter and B. Luderitz
Atrial fibrillation: mortality, morbidity, and money; is that all? Importance and variability of burden measurement
Eur. Heart J., January 2, 2005; 26(2): 110 - 111.
[Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.